Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Recreation and Travel

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Recreation and Travel

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Recreation and Travel lead costs moved through a year of sharp contrasts across all countries: a dramatic February spike, a long slide into a September–October trough, and a late-year rebound that accelerated into January 2026. Across the full period, cost per lead (CPL) for the category averaged 49.7, notably higher than the 41.0 global, all‑industry benchmark. However, that average is skewed by February’s outlier; excluding that month, Recreation and Travel’s average settles near 41.6 — essentially in line with the broader market. Volatility was the defining feature.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Recreation and Travel across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The year opened at 33.5 in January 2025, then surged to a one‑month high of 146.5 in February — the standout anomaly. From there, CPL cooled rapidly to 45.9 in March and continued easing through midyear: 67.0 in April, stabilizing around 49–50 in May–June, and stepping down to 47.7 in July. The floor arrived in early fall: 25.3 in August, the year’s low of 21.9 in September, and 22.8 in October. A measured rebuild followed — 40.1 in November and 39.1 in December — before a strong lift to 57.2 in January 2026. That marks a 71% rise versus the prior January and a 46% month‑over‑month jump from December.

Volatility averaged a sizable 26.5 points month to month, driven by the February spike and March correction. Removing those two swings, average monthly movement still clocked in at 10.4 — roughly triple the global benchmark’s steadier 3.5.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The category’s rhythm split into three acts:

  • Elevated and choppy in H1, with February’s spike and a gradual normalization through June (Q2 average: 55.4).
  • A pronounced soft patch in late summer into early fall, with the lowest CPL in September and October (Q3 average: 31.7; October at 22.8).
  • A controlled rebuild in Q4 (average: 34.0) and a sharp upswing into January 2026 at 57.2.

By contrast, the global benchmark followed a more classic seasonal slope: rising from Q1 (36.2) through Q3 (44.2) and peaking in Q4 (46.5), before pulling back to 34.5 in January 2026. In other words, while global Facebook Ads benchmarks tightened through the back half of the year, Recreation and Travel CPL found its low point then and only began rising at year’s end.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the all‑industry global baseline, Recreation and Travel was:

  • Above market from February through July — most notably April (+79%) and February (+265%).
  • Below average from August through December, with the widest discounts in September (−55%) and October (−53%).
  • Back above market in January 2026 (+66%).

Across the full window, the category’s CPL ran 21% above the global average, but excluding February’s anomaly it was effectively flat versus the market (+2%). The narrowest gap appeared in January 2025 (−4%), while the widest spread was February’s +265%.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost‑per‑lead benchmarks for Recreation and Travel across all countries highlights how a single spike reshaped the headline average, while the underlying trend traced a summer–fall trough and a year‑end rebound. These CPL trends situate industry ad performance against the global benchmark, helping frame country‑specific ad costs and CTR performance narratives alongside broader CPC and CPM analysis.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Recreation and Travel industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.