Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Recreation and Travel

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Recreation and Travel

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Recreation and Travel lead costs ran hot and highly variable across all countries, diverging sharply from the steadier global benchmark. The category opened with premium cost-per-lead (CPL) levels in late 2024, spiked again in February, then steadily cooled into late Q3, landing well below the overall market by September–October. The story is one of pronounced seasonality, dramatic peaks, and an unusually wide trading range.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Recreation and Travel across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

Section 1: The story in the data

Over the full period, Recreation and Travel CPL averaged about 68.43, versus a 40.94 global average—roughly 67% higher. The category’s range was extreme: a high of 184.05 in December 2024 and a low of 18.40 in September 2025, a 10x swing peak-to-trough.

The arc is clear in monthly movements:

  • November 2024 started elevated at 138.22, then surged to 184.05 in December (+46 points).
  • January dropped sharply to 33.64 (−150 points), before a February rebound to 146.49 (+113).
  • From March through July, costs normalized into the mid-40s to mid-60s (March 45.84; April 65.91; May 47.50; June 48.61; July 44.59).
  • Late summer brought a step-down: August 28.52, September 18.40 (the period low), and a modest October uptick to 19.37.

Volatility was the defining feature. Average month-to-month absolute change reached 43.68 points for Recreation and Travel, compared with just 3.22 for the global benchmark—an order of magnitude more choppy.

Section 2: Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The category shows classic Q4 pressure with elevated CPLs in November–December, followed by a Q1 reset in January. An atypical February spike briefly reintroduced high acquisition costs before a mid-year stretch of relative stability. From August onward, lead costs steadily softened, with September marking the trough and October edging slightly higher but still near the floor. In contrast, the overall market typically saw steadier conditions, with costs clustering in the mid-30s to high-40s and a gentle rise into late Q3.

Section 3: Recreation and Travel vs. Global

Recreation and Travel was consistently more expensive and more volatile for most of the period, but the relationship flipped late in the year. Key comparisons:

  • Average CPL: 68.43 for Recreation and Travel vs. 40.94 globally (+67%).
  • December was the widest premium: +365% versus global (184.05 vs. 39.63).
  • September was the widest discount: −62% versus global (18.40 vs. 48.29).
  • Near parity appeared in January (−6% vs. global) and July (+5% vs. global).
  • Trend direction diverged: the global benchmark rose gradually into Q3, while Recreation and Travel fell from February’s spike to a deep Q3 trough, ending October −86% from November’s starting point.

Closing

Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead show that Recreation and Travel across all countries experienced elevated, highly variable CPLs, with Q4 spikes, a February rebound, and a decisive late-year slide well below the global average. Understanding cost-per-lead benchmarks for the Recreation and Travel industry across all countries helps teams interpret country-specific ad costs, compare CPL analysis to the broader Facebook Ads benchmarks, and contextualize category-level performance dynamics.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Recreation and Travel industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.