Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Recreation and Travel

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Recreation and Travel

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Cost per lead for Recreation and Travel across all countries moved through a dramatic reset over the last 13 months, starting with outsized readings, sliding into a late-summer trough, and finishing with a measured rebound. Against the global, all‑industry Facebook Ads benchmarks, the category averaged higher costs overall but spent much of late Q3 and Q4 below market. Volatility was the headline early; steadiness defined the back half.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Recreation and Travel across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to finish: Recreation and Travel CPL opened at 184.05 in December 2024 and closed at 46.20 in December 2025, a 75% decline across the period.
  • Highs and lows: The category’s two notable peaks were December 2024 (184.05) and February 2025 (146.98). The low hit in September 2025 at 20.55, with October near that floor (21.42).
  • Averages: The 13‑month average landed at 59.82. Excluding the two early spikes, the average drops to 40.60—almost identical to the 40.06 global mean. The median month for the category was 46.43 versus a 39.77 global median.
  • Volatility: Average absolute month‑to‑month change was 38.21 for Recreation and Travel versus just 3.91 globally—about 10× more volatile—driven by the early surges. From April onward, swings normalized to roughly 10.47 on average.

Key moves: After January’s reset (33.67), February spiked to 146.98 before giving way to a steady comedown: mid‑Q2 hovered around 49–67; Q3 pushed decisively lower, breaking below 30 in August and bottoming at 20.55 in September. The category then rebounded through Q4 to 46.20 by December.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Quarterly rhythm shows the arc clearly:

  • Q1 2025 (Jan–Mar): 75.70 average, shaped by a February surge.
  • Q2 (Apr–Jun): 55.26 average, consolidation in the high‑40s to mid‑60s.
  • Q3 (Jul–Sep): 31.20 average, a continued slide to the September low.
  • Q4 (Oct–Dec): 35.69 average, progressive recovery from October’s floor.

This path contrasts with the broader market’s pattern. Global CPL typically firmed through late summer and early Q4 (global Q3 average 43.74; October peak 48.41) before an end‑of‑year dip to 32.53 in December, while Recreation and Travel became cheapest in late Q3 and then climbed into December.

Country vs. Global

Relative positioning shifted over the year:

  • On average, Recreation and Travel CPL was 49% above the global mean, but the median gap was a narrower +17%.
  • The category ran above the global benchmark in 8 of 13 months, yet trailed through late Q3 and much of Q4. August through November sat 14–57% below global levels, with the gap tightest in January (−4%) and widest at the start (December 2024: +379%) and in February (+270%).
  • Trend comparison: From January to October, the global benchmark rose 39%, while Recreation and Travel fell 36%; from September’s low to December, the category rebounded 125% even as the global series declined 32%.

Closing

Taken together, these Facebook Ads benchmarks show cost‑per‑lead trends for Recreation and Travel across all countries that began with outsized early‑year costs, reset sharply into a late‑summer low, and ended close to long‑run global levels. Understanding CPL benchmarks for Recreation and Travel across all countries helps marketers evaluate category ad performance, country‑specific ad costs, and how this industry aligns with or diverges from the global trend line.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Recreation and Travel industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.