Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Retail

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Retail

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Retail lead costs ran hot across all countries, consistently above the global benchmark and moving in bigger swings month to month. Median cost per lead (CPL) for Retail averaged $60.6 across the last 12 months, versus a $40.9 global all‑industry average. The year opened with elevated holiday‑carryover costs, eased into January, spiked again in April, then hit the annual low in June before rebuilding through late summer and cooling in early Q4. Volatility was a defining feature, with Retail showing roughly triple the month‑to‑month movement seen in the broader market.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Retail in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Retail CPL started at $75.89 in November 2024 and ended at $53.21 in October 2025, a 30% decline from start to finish. The highs clustered at the bookends of peak demand periods: $75.89 in November and $75.44 in April. The annual low arrived in June at $46.79. Across the year, Retail CPL averaged $60.6, ranging from $46.79 (June) to $75.89 (November).

Month‑to‑month, the data moved in pronounced waves:

  • November to January fell sharply (−20% in December, −19% in January).
  • February rebounded +29% vs. January, and April spiked +22% vs. March to near peak.
  • The sharpest downswing followed: April to June dropped 38% to the year’s low.
  • Recovery resumed in late summer: June to August climbed +35%, before easing −16% into October.

Volatility averaged about $10.2 per month in Retail CPL—much choppier than the global benchmark’s $3.2 average monthly change.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

A clear rhythm emerged:

  • Late Q4 (Nov–Dec): elevated CPLs averaging $68.5, reflecting peak‑season competition.
  • Q1: costs eased but remained elevated (avg. $58.6), with a February rebound restoring momentum after January’s trough.
  • Q2: the most dramatic stretch—an April spike to $75.44 followed by a June low at $46.79; the quarter still averaged a lofty $62.0 given April’s weight.
  • Q3: stabilization in the upper‑$50s/low‑$60s (avg. $58.5) as CPLs rebuilt from June.
  • Early Q4 (October): a softer $53.21, down from August’s local high.

Notably, Retail spent seven of twelve months above $60, underscoring sustained pressure on country‑specific ad costs despite midyear relief.

Country vs. Global

Against the all‑industry global benchmark, Retail CPL ran higher every month—about 48% above average for the year. The gap was widest in April, when Retail CPL was nearly double the market (+96%), and in March and November (+85% and +83%). The narrowest differentials arrived during the midyear cooldown: June (+14%), October (+18%), and September (+23%).

While the global benchmark followed a steadier climb from a March low ($33.35) to a September high ($48.29) and finished October up 9% versus November, Retail’s path was choppier and net‑down from its elevated holiday starting point. In short: the market rose steadily (+9% Nov to Oct), while Retail’s trend was more volatile and ultimately 30% lower from its November peak.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost per lead (CPL) benchmarks for Retail in all countries helps marketers interpret country‑specific ad costs, compare Facebook Ads benchmarks to the global market, and contextualize CPL alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Retail industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.