Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for SaaS & Cloud Platforms in Colombia

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for SaaS & Cloud Platforms in Colombia

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks: SaaS & Cloud Platforms in Colombia vs. global

This analysis looks at cost-per-lead trends for the SaaS & Cloud Platforms industry in Colombia compared to the global baseline. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

Key takeaways

  • Overall level: Colombia’s average cost-per-lead (CPL) was 53.3, about 48% above the global baseline average of 36.0 — generally above market.
  • Volatility: Colombia showed very high month-to-month swings (median absolute MoM change ~132%, average ~231%), far higher than the baseline (median ~9%, average ~13%) — markedly more volatile.
  • Seasonal shape: The global trend rose in Q4 and eased into early Q1, then held in a mid-30s to low-40s band before a sharper dip in September. Colombia diverged: a sharp November spike and a December trough, then another surge peaking in May and August.
  • Trend over time: Colombia ended higher than it started (+65% from October 2024 to September 2025), while the global baseline declined (-34%) over the same period.

Selected data overview: SaaS & Cloud Platforms in Colombia

  • Average CPL: 53.3 across Oct 2024–Sep 2025.
  • Highs and lows:
  • High: 179.25 in May 2025.
  • Low: 5.50 in December 2024.
  • Notable spikes/dips:
  • Oct → Nov 2024: +1,068% surge (8.80 to 102.75).
  • Nov → Dec 2024: -94.6% drop (to the lowest month).
  • Apr → May 2025: +204% jump to the annual high.
  • Aug → Sep 2025: -87% correction.
  • Volatility: Average absolute MoM change ~231%; median ~132% — indicates large swings rather than a stable seasonal pattern.
  • Start vs. end: 8.80 in October 2024 to 14.55 in September 2025 (+65%).

Comparison to the global baseline

  • Level: Colombia averaged 53.3 vs. global 36.0 — about 48% higher.
  • Highs/lows:
  • Global high: 41.58 in November 2024; low: 20.63 in September 2025.
  • Colombia’s peak (179.25 in May) was 3.3× the global peak; its trough (5.50 in December) was ~73% below the global low.
  • Above/below market: Colombia ran above the global level in 6 of 12 months (notably Nov, Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug), and below in 6 months (Oct, Dec, Jan, Feb, Mar, Sep). When above, it was often far above; when below, it was materially lower.
  • Volatility: Median absolute MoM change of ~132% in Colombia vs. ~9% globally — roughly 14× more volatile.
  • Trajectory: While Colombia rose from start to finish, the global series eased overall, with its sharpest decline in September 2025 (-44% vs. August).

Seasonal patterns and monthly dynamics

  • Q4 behavior:
  • Global: Costs typically increase in Q4 around holiday periods, visible in the November uplift (33.6% vs. October) and elevated December.
  • Colombia: November spiked, but December collapsed to the yearly low, diverging from the global pattern.
  • H1 2025: Global stabilized around the mid-to-high 30s. Colombia rose through spring, culminating in a May high.
  • Q3 2025: Colombia saw another elevation in August (112.21) followed by a steep September drop (14.55). Global also dipped in September, but far less erratically than Colombia.

Understanding cost-per-lead benchmarks on Facebook Ads in SaaS & Cloud Platforms and Colombia helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the SaaS & Cloud Platforms industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Colombia, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Colombia Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Mar 24Saint Joseph's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
May 1Labour Day
Jun 2Ascension Day
Jun 23Corpus Christi
Jun 30Sacred Heart of Jesus
Jul 20Independence Day
Aug 7Battle of Boyacá
Aug 18Assumption of Mary
Oct 13Columbus Day
Nov 3All Saints' Day
Nov 17Independence of Cartagena
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), December (Christmas), Mid‑year promotions around Independence Day (Jul 20) and Children's Day (Oct 13)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might increase during long weekends and holidays like Independence Day due to heightened leisure media consumption. Major e‑commerce events could result in sharp spikes in retail competition. June holidays could disrupt typical ad pacing. Many holidays shifted to Mondays make weekend campaigns perform better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.