Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Software Development in Norway

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Software Development in Norway

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads cost per lead benchmarks: Software Development in Norway vs. global

This analysis looks at cost per lead (CPL) trends for industry Software Development and target country Norway compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

Key takeaways

  • Overall level: Norway’s Software Development CPL averaged 33.16 across the period, about 11% below the global baseline (37.44). Median CPL was 31.10 in Norway vs. 38.59 globally, indicating Norway generally ran below market.
  • Volatility: Norway showed high month‑to‑month volatility (average absolute move 82.7% and 17.70 points), versus a much steadier global pattern (10.2% and 3.59 points).
  • Trend: From the first month (Oct 2024) to the last (Aug 2025), Norway’s CPL fell 39.8%, while the global baseline rose 19.0%.
  • Seasonal patterns: The global benchmark shows a mild Q4 lift (Nov is the peak). Norway’s series diverged with a sharp December dip and a January spike, then a mid‑year lull.

Norway (selected data) overview

  • Average and median: Average CPL 33.16; median 31.10.
  • Highs and lows: High at 55.997 in Jan 2025; low at 10.909 in Dec 2024; range 45.09 points.
  • Change over time: Oct 2024 to Aug 2025 decreased from 51.66 to 31.10 (-39.8%).
  • Volatility:
  • Average absolute month‑to‑month change: 17.70 points.
  • Average absolute percent change: 82.7%.
  • Notable movements:
  • Dec 2024 dipped 74% vs. Nov to 10.91 (period low).
  • Jan 2025 rebounded +414% to 56.00 (period high).
  • Apr 2025 jumped +142% vs. Mar to 41.97.
  • Summer softened: Jun–Jul stayed low (26.17 → 22.59) before Aug rose to 31.10.

Global baseline comparison

  • Average and median: Average 37.44; median 38.59.
  • Highs and lows: High at 41.58 (Nov 2024); low at 31.12 (Oct 2024); range 10.45 points.
  • Change over time: Oct 2024 to Aug 2025 increased from 31.12 to 37.03 (+19.0%).
  • Volatility:
  • Average absolute month‑to‑month change: 3.59 points.
  • Average absolute percent change: 10.2%.
  • Seasonality: Q4 costs were elevated versus October, with November the peak, and relatively stable through the rest of the year.

Norway vs. global: where it ran above/below

  • Norway was below the global baseline in 7 of 11 months (Dec, Feb, Mar, May, Jun, Jul, Aug) and above in 4 months (Oct, Nov, Jan, Apr).
  • Quarterly view (for context):
  • Q4 (Oct–Dec): Norway averaged 34.86 vs. global 37.44—close to market but with a pronounced December dip.
  • Q1 (Jan–Mar): Norway averaged 36.78 vs. global 35.75—slightly above market due to the January spike, followed by a drop into March.

What this means for benchmarking

  • Relative positioning: Norway’s Software Development CPL was generally below average globally, but with far greater month‑to‑month swings than the market.
  • Seasonal signals: The global pattern shows typical Q4 firmness. Norway deviated with a December trough and sharp rebounds in January and April, then a subdued early summer before lifting into August.

Understanding cost per lead benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Software Development and Norway helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Software Development industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Norway, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Norway Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 17Constitution Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Singles Day), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), Spring holiday period (April–May travel and tourism)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter and Ascension when Norwegians travel or spend time on leisure. Constitution Day (May 17) is widely celebrated—media activity may increase and ad competition could intensify. Most public holidays result in shop closures; ad inventory may shrink during holidays. Pentecost weekend may reduce weekday competition.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.