Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in South Africa

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in South Africa

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

South Africa’s cost-per-lead story over the past eight months reads like two markets in one: unusually low CPLs clustered in the 3–4 range for most months, interrupted by three outsized spikes that dramatically lifted the average. Against the steady global benchmark, the South African line was far more volatile—mostly well below market with sudden surges in January, February, and June. The net effect is a period that feels inexpensive on typical days but expensive on headline averages.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in South Africa compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

South Africa’s monthly median CPL opened at 0.94 in December 2024, then vaulted to a record 238.04 in January 2025 and 103.56 in February, before resetting to low single digits through spring: 4.33 in March, 3.96 in April, and 3.48 in May. June jumped again to 91.15, followed by a return to 3.75 in July. Over the period, the average CPL landed at 56, but the median month sat near 4.1—capturing how a handful of spikes defined the average while most months remained inexpensive. The range from low to high was extreme (0.94 to 238.04).

Month-to-month moves underscored the volatility. The average absolute swing was about 92 points, with sharp reversals such as February to March (−96%) and May to June (+2,500%+). By comparison, the global benchmark moved just 3.3 points on average month to month.

Globally, CPLs were steadier: an average of 37.9 across the same window, oscillating narrowly between 33.16 (March) and 40.63 (June) and ending July at 40.27. Where the global line hummed along, South Africa’s zig-zagged.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

  • Q1: Atypical for South Africa. While global CPLs were softer in January–March (mid-30s), South Africa surged: 238.04 in January and 103.56 in February before normalizing in March. The Q1 average in South Africa (≈115) was more than triple the global Q1 average (≈36).
  • Q2: Mixed rhythm. April (3.96) and May (3.48) sat in a tight, low-cost band, before June spiked to 91.15. The Q2 average (≈32.2) came in slightly below the global Q2 average (≈38.9).
  • Early Q3: July reset to the low band at 3.75, far below the global 40.27.

Across the period, five of eight months in South Africa landed below the global benchmark, and three months (January, February, June) ran well above it.

South Africa vs. Global

Relative to global Facebook Ads benchmarks:

  • South Africa’s CPL was 85–92% below global in most low-cost months (March–May, July).
  • Spikes lifted the market to 2–7x above global levels in January, February, and June.
  • On average for December–July, South Africa’s CPL printed about 48% higher than the global average due to those spikes, despite a typical monthly band around 3–4 that sits roughly 90% below global levels.
  • Volatility was the distinguishing feature: South Africa’s average month-to-month movement (~92 points) was nearly 30x the global change (~3.3 points).

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for all industries in South Africa show a market that is usually inexpensive but punctuated by rare, pronounced surges—producing a choppy profile versus a steady global baseline. Understanding these CPL trends in South Africa helps advertisers interpret country-specific ad costs and compare industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting South Africa, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

South Africa Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 21Human Rights Day
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Family Day
Apr 27Freedom Day
May 1Workers' Day
Jun 16Youth Day
Aug 9National Women's Day
Sep 24Heritage Day
Dec 16Day of Reconciliation
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Day of Goodwill

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), December (Christmas & Day of Goodwill), Mid-year retail (June Youth Day promotions)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during long weekends like Human Rights Day, Freedom Day, and Heritage Day as leisure and travel-related media consumption increases. Retail CPMs may spike in late November–December for holiday shopping. Youth Day and National Women's Day might drive regional campaigns. Weekend extensions across public holidays may benefit weekend campaigns.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.