Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in South Africa

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in South Africa

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

South Africa’s all‑industries cost per lead (CPL) in 2025 reads like a two‑speed market: brief bursts of very expensive leads at the start and mid‑year, followed by an extended run of unusually low costs. Against the steady global benchmark, South Africa was markedly more volatile, swinging from 6.8x the global median in January to a fraction of it by spring and again in December. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in South Africa compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The year opened at a high: January’s median CPL in South Africa hit 238, before falling to 104 in February and plunging to 4.33 in March. It remained low through May (3.48) and July (3.75), with a sharp re‑acceleration in June (91.15) and a soft December finish (5.51). Across the eight months with available readings, South Africa averaged 56.7, with a median of 4.9 — highlighting how a few spikes lifted the average even as typical months were inexpensive. The high was January (238); the low was May (3.48). From January to December, CPL declined roughly 98%, underscoring the year’s downward momentum after an early surge.

Volatility was the standout feature. Month‑to‑month moves averaged about 58.8 points in South Africa, compared with just 3.0 points for the global benchmark over the same cadence — nearly 19x more volatile. The sharpest downshift came between February and March (−99.2 points), while the steepest rebound occurred in May to June (+87.7 points). In contrast, late‑year changes were minimal.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The pattern suggests a pronounced Q1 spike (January–February) followed by a sharp March reset. April and May stayed subdued, June briefly snapped back to higher CPLs, and early Q3 (July) returned to low levels. By December, costs were still near the spring troughs. Globally, CPLs typically firm through late Q3 and Q4 as competition increases, and 2025 followed that rhythm: the global median climbed from 35.0 in January to 42.2 in December. South Africa, however, did not mirror that late‑year firming; instead, it closed the year at one of its lowest points.

Country vs. Global

On matched months, South Africa’s average CPL (56.7) sat about 47% above the global median (38.7). But the month‑by‑month relative position flipped dramatically. South Africa was far above market in January (+579%) and June (+121%), elevated in February (+158%), and well below average in March (−87%), April (−89%), May (−91%), July (−91%), and December (−87%). The gap never narrowed to parity: at its “closest,” December still trailed the global level by 87%, while January ran nearly 6.8x above it. Globally, the trend line rose gently across the year; South Africa’s path was choppier, toggling between outlier highs and extended stretches of low CPLs.

Closing

For Facebook Ads benchmarks, this CPL view shows a highly bifurcated 2025 for all industries in South Africa: brief, costly surges amid long spans of inexpensive lead generation. While CPC trends and CPM analysis often frame country‑specific ad costs, the CPL picture is decisive here — extreme volatility, a high average lifted by a few months, and a typical month (median) far below the global level. Understanding Facebook Ads cost‑per‑lead benchmarks for all industries in South Africa helps teams assess lead‑generation efficiency and compare it to global patterns in 2025.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting South Africa, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

South Africa Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 21Human Rights Day
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Family Day
Apr 27Freedom Day
May 1Workers' Day
Jun 16Youth Day
Aug 9National Women's Day
Sep 24Heritage Day
Dec 16Day of Reconciliation
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Day of Goodwill

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), December (Christmas & Day of Goodwill), Mid-year retail (June Youth Day promotions)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during long weekends like Human Rights Day, Freedom Day, and Heritage Day as leisure and travel-related media consumption increases. Retail CPMs may spike in late November–December for holiday shopping. Youth Day and National Women's Day might drive regional campaigns. Weekend extensions across public holidays may benefit weekend campaigns.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.