Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in Spain

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in Spain

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Spain’s cost-per-lead picture across all industries moved to a different rhythm than the global market: higher on average, but defined by sharp swings rather than a smooth climb. The period opened near the global mark, surged dramatically in December, collapsed through late spring, then spiked again mid‑summer before finishing Q4 at subdued levels. The standout months—December, June, and August—drove most of the variance, while February, April–May, and early Q4 marked unusually low-cost troughs.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Spain compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to finish: Spain’s median CPL moved from 35.90 in November 2024 to 16.21 in October 2025, a 55% decline across the window despite multiple mid‑year spikes.
  • Average, highs, and lows: Spain averaged 50.37, versus a global average of 40.76. The high was 149.17 in June; the low was 2.09 in February—a range of 147 points, nearly 3x the Spanish average and about 10x the global range.
  • Key movements:
  • November to December: a jump from 35.90 to 122.56 (+86.7).
  • January to February: a plunge to 2.09 (−42.8).
  • April–May: further softness around 9.22 and 7.08.
  • June surge: 149.17 (+142.1 from May), the period’s peak.
  • August echo: 132.89 after a moderate July.
  • September–October: a return to low teens (13.09 and 16.21).

Volatility was the defining feature. Spain’s month-to-month absolute swing averaged 68.3 points; the global benchmark moved by just 3.1 on average, underscoring a far more erratic local CPL profile.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality surfaced but with amplified amplitudes. Q4 2024 showed a classic year-end surge: December’s CPL hit 122.56, consistent with holiday competition seen in Facebook Ads benchmarks. Early Q1 2025 was uneven—January was elevated (44.93) before February cratered to 2.09, then March stabilized at 37.31. Late spring (April–May) remained soft with single‑digit CPLs. Q2 ended with an outsized June spike (149.17), and Q3 repeated the oscillation: a moderate July, a pronounced August spike, then a September slide into low teens. October continued that softer trend, a common pattern as markets reset before late‑year demand.

Spain vs. Global

Across all industries, Spain’s CPL averaged 24% above the global benchmark (50.37 vs. 40.76). The global series rose steadily (+9% from November to October), peaking in September (47.62) before easing slightly to 45.08—comparatively orderly moves. Spain was above market in 5 of 12 months—January, March, and especially December, June, and August—yet it ran notably below in the remaining seven months, including deep troughs in February (−95% vs. global), May (−83%), and September (−72%). At its narrowest gap, Spain sat roughly 12% above global in March; at its widest, it was 264% above in June and 95% below in February. In short: Spain’s CPL was not just higher on average—it was markedly more volatile.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for all industries in Spain reveals a market with elevated averages and outsized swings, contrasting with steadier global CPL trends. This country-specific ad costs view complements CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, grounding industry ad performance comparisons between Spain and the global benchmark.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Spain, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Spain Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 17Maundy Thursday (some regions)
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Easter Monday (some regions)
May 1Labour Day
Aug 15Assumption Day
Oct 13National Day of Spain
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 6Constitution Day
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November–early December (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Mid-August (summer promotions), December (Christmas & post-Christmas sales)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might increase during Semana Santa (Holy Week) and May Day, particularly for travel and tourism campaigns. 'Puentes' (bridge days) could reduce weekday inventory while pre-holiday traffic boosts media consumption. Black Friday typically marks sharp rises in retail competition. Late December brings peak ad volumes and e‑commerce CPM spikes.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.