Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in Sweden

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in Sweden

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Sweden’s all-industry Facebook Ads cost-per-lead (CPL) profile diverged sharply from the global benchmark over the past year, marked by dramatic mid-year spikes and a wide cost range. The story opens quietly—low costs in late 2024—then accelerates into a volatile 2025, peaking in August before easing but remaining elevated. Across the period, Sweden’s CPL averaged roughly 366, about nine times the global average of 41 for the same months, reflecting both structural elevation and outsized volatility.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Sweden compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to endpoint: Sweden’s CPL moved from 68.45 in November 2024 to 335.48 in October 2025—an increase of about 390%.
  • Highs and lows: The year’s low landed in December at 26.97, while the highest point surged to 1,739.83 in August. The range between the low and high was a striking 1,713.
  • Average and median: The average CPL in Sweden across the observed months was about 366; the median sat at 126.82—still roughly triple the global monthly average.
  • Key movements:
  • December dipped sharply (−61% from November), briefly undercutting global levels.
  • February jumped to 208.20, then retreated in March before a major spike in April (624.22).
  • After a quieter June (54.98), Q3 escalated rapidly: July 126.82, August 1,739.83, September 713.42.
  • From the August peak, CPL compressed through October but remained high (335.48).

Volatility was pronounced. The typical month-over-month swing in Sweden was about 111% by median, versus roughly 8% globally. In raw terms, Sweden’s average absolute month-to-month change was around 459, compared with 3–4 for the global series.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Sweden’s pattern broke from the common narrative. Q4 2024—often costlier—was actually the softest stretch, with November and especially December presenting the lowest CPLs. Early 2025 turned choppy: a February surge, a March reset, and a spring peak in April. The most intense pressure arrived in Q3. The July–September average reached about 860, driven by the August spike and a still-elevated September. Post-peak, costs eased into October but stayed well above early-year norms. This rhythm points to a year of two halves: subdued costs in late 2024, then a pronounced cost regime from spring through fall.

Sweden vs. Global

Against the global benchmark, Sweden was consistently above market except in December:

  • Averages: Sweden ~366 vs. global ~41, about 9x higher.
  • Trajectory: The global trend rose modestly (+9% from November to October), while Sweden climbed sharply (+390%) with far greater turbulence.
  • Month-by-month gap: The narrowest gap occurred in June (+34% vs. global). The widest appeared in August, when Sweden’s CPL was about 39x the global level (+3,842%). December was the only month below global (−32%).
  • Q3 contrast: Sweden averaged ~860 in Q3 vs. the global ~45, underscoring a concentrated mid-year elevation in country-specific ad costs.

Even excluding the August outlier, Sweden’s average remained elevated (~228), more than five times the global average. Excluding the entire Q3 period, Sweden still averaged ~180—about 4–5x global—indicating that the market’s higher CPLs were not purely a single-month anomaly.

Closing

Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in all industries in Sweden show a market with structurally higher CPLs and extreme mid-year volatility compared to global patterns. This CPL analysis—set alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance considerations—helps quantify country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance in Sweden relative to the global benchmark.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Sweden, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Sweden Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 6National Day
Jun 21Midsummer Day
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday is huge), December (Christmas and post-Christmas sales), June (Midsummer seasonal promotions), January (Winter sale season)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPMs might spike during Black Friday and early December, especially in e‑commerce and fashion. Easter and Midsummer holidays often decrease weekday inventory but increase media usage during long weekends. Midsummer tends to be quiet in retail but active in travel and food sectors. Post-Christmas sales in January still see high digital ad demand.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.