Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Textiles

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Textiles

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Cost per Lead for the Textiles industry ran noticeably hotter—and far choppier—than the global all‑industry benchmark. The year opened with a deep trough, then whiplashed into a record April spike before settling into a choppy deceleration through Q4. On average, Textiles CPL landed at $84.89 across the observed months, more than double the global figure of $40.37 over the same period. The spread swung from dramatically below market in early Q1 to multiples above market in spring and late summer.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Textiles across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The series begins high in November 2024 at $125.78 and steps down to $43.92 in December. It then collapses to rock‑bottom levels in early 2025—$2.18 in January and $1.79 in February—before snapping to the year’s peak at $301.49 in April. Mid‑Q2 steadied in the mid‑$50s ($57.33 in May, $56.78 in June). H2 opened elevated at $147.91 in July, cooled to $80.41 in August, lifted to $128.82 in September, and then eased through Q4 to $39.99 in October and $32.32 in November.

Key markers:

  • Average CPL (Textiles, all countries): $84.89; range: $1.79 (Feb) to $301.49 (Apr).
  • Start vs. end: $125.78 (Nov 2024) to $32.32 (Nov 2025), a 74% decline.
  • Volatility: average month‑to‑month absolute change of $88.36, far higher than the global benchmark’s $4.23.

The amplitude is striking: CPL surged more than 100x from February’s low to April’s high, then oscillated in a wide $40–$150 band for most of H2 before softening into November.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality presented in sharp relief. Q4 opened elevated in November and eased into December. Q1 marked the softest period by a wide margin, with January–February producing the lowest CPLs of the year. Q2 flipped the script: April delivered the annual high, followed by a cooler May–June. H2 was choppy—spikes in July and September, pullbacks in August and October—finishing with a gentler CPL in November. In short, the rhythm moved from Q1 trough to Q2 peak, then a staggered normalization into late Q3 and a Q4 comedown.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global all‑industry benchmark, Textiles was above market in 9 of the 12 overlapping months. The gap was highly variable:

  • Deep underperformance in early Q1: −94% in January and −96% in February versus global.
  • Massive outperformance in spring: +695% in April.
  • Summer and early fall remained meaningfully above: +251% in July, +82% in August, +170% in September.
  • Narrowest gap in October, when Textiles slipped 11% below global before ending November modestly above (+13%).

Trend-wise, the global benchmark climbed gradually from January to September and eased into Q4 (−31% from Nov‑to‑Nov). Textiles was markedly more erratic, posting a steeper Nov‑to‑Nov decline (−74%) but spending most months at higher CPLs than the all‑industry average.

Closing

Viewed through Facebook Ads benchmarks, Cost per Lead for the Textiles industry across all countries was elevated, erratic, and seasonally polarized—well above global levels on average, with dramatic swings between Q1 lows and an April peak. Understanding Cost per Lead benchmarks for the Textiles industry across all countries helps advertisers contextualize country‑specific ad costs and industry ad performance alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance in the global market.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Textiles industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.