Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Venture Capital & Investment

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Venture Capital & Investment

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Cost Per Lead (CPL) for Venture Capital & Investment campaigns ran well below the global Facebook Ads benchmarks for most of the period—but with far sharper swings. The category saw a deep trough in Q2, a dramatic July spike to the annual high, and a late-year drift back toward the market. By October, CPL was slightly above the global level, capping a choppy but upward-tilting arc.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Venture Capital & Investment in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Venture Capital & Investment CPL began at $40.94 in November 2024 and ended at $46.75 in October 2025, a 14% rise. The category averaged $26.63 across the available months—about 36% below the global average of $41.63 for the same period—yet it traversed a wide range, from a low of $4.65 in April to a high of $59.07 in July.

The monthly path was notably turbulent:

  • November to December saw a sharp -71% drop ($40.94 → $11.83).
  • January rebounded +148% ($11.83 → $29.34), before softening into February ($23.21).
  • The spring trough arrived in April at $4.65 (−80% from February), with June also near the floor at $4.72.
  • July then surged to $59.07, a +1,152% jump from June, before cooling -66% in August ($20.29).
  • September regained ground to $41.42 (+104% from August), and October edged up to $46.75 (+13%).

Month-to-month volatility averaged about 20.3 points, roughly eight times the global baseline’s 2.5-point average move over the same sequence—underscoring how unusually choppy lead costs were for this industry.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The global CPL pattern exhibited a familiar rhythm: softer through December and January, then gradually rising into late summer with a September peak, followed by a modest October pullback. The Venture Capital & Investment category deviated from that cadence. After a December slide, the category experienced a pronounced Q2 trough (April–June single-digit CPLs) while the global market held in the upper-30s to low-40s. A singular July spike reset levels to the annual high, followed by an August correction and a return toward mid-40s by early Q4. The result is a year marked by sharp inflections rather than smooth seasonality.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, Venture Capital & Investment CPL averaged 36% lower, with a median of $23.21 versus the market’s $41.10 (−44%). The category sat below global levels in eight of eleven months, was near-par in November (−1%), and rose above the market twice: July (+39% vs. global $42.37) and October (+3.7% vs. $45.08). The narrowest gap appeared in October; the widest in June, when CPL was 89% below the global mark. Over the period, the global trend rose steadily (+8.7% from November to October), while the category climbed more (+14%) but with far greater month-to-month dispersion.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Lead in the Venture Capital & Investment category across all countries shows a market that is structurally cheaper than the global average but markedly more volatile, with a Q2 trough, a July spike, and a late-year convergence toward global CPLs. These CPL trends provide a clear basis for evaluating industry ad performance and country-specific ad costs relative to global Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Venture Capital & Investment industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.