See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all countries, Wine and Spirits lead generation costs moved through the year with dramatic swings: a January spike to triple-digit CPLs, followed by a swift reset into single digits by spring, then a late‑summer lift before easing into October. Compared with the global benchmark across all industries, the category was cheaper on average but far more volatile, with standout months that widened and then narrowed the gap to the market. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The period opened at $39.07 CPL in November, dipped to $32.45 in December, and then surged to a cycle high of $122.73 in January. That peak quickly unwound: CPL fell to $16.94 in February and reached near‑floor levels in March ($4.96) and the period low in June ($4.91). From there, the category climbed through late summer—$53.72 in August and $54.74 in September—before cooling to $23.54 in October. Over the full window, Wine and Spirits averaged $36.29 CPL, finishing 40% below November’s starting point.
Volatility defined the category. Month‑to‑month changes averaged $32.29, a swing equal to nearly 90% of the category’s mean CPL. By contrast, the global benchmark was stable: it ranged from $33.35 (March) to $48.29 (September), averaged $40.94, and moved just $3.22 month‑to‑month. The benchmark climbed from $41.47 in November to $45.08 in October (+8.7%), while Wine and Spirits trended downward across the same span.
The rhythm was pronounced. Q4 was moderate, with November–December in the $32–$39 band. January delivered an outsized spike, then the category reset sharply: Q1 averaged $48.21 only because of January’s anomaly, while March landed under $5. Q2 marked the trough (average $23.71), bottoming in June. Momentum returned in late Q3, with August–September in the mid‑$50s (Q3 average $41.54), before October eased back to the low‑$20s.
The global market showed a steadier seasonal arc typical of Facebook Ads benchmarks: softer in March, gradually rising into late Q3/early Q4, and easing slightly in October.
Across all countries, Wine and Spirits CPL averaged about 11% below the global benchmark ($36.29 vs. $40.94). The category undercut global levels in 9 of 12 months, most notably in March (−85%) and June (−88%). It outpaced the market during three moments: January (+243% vs. global), August (+20%), and September (+13%). The tightest gap appeared in November (−6% vs. global), while the widest underperformance came in June. Overall, the benchmark rose steadily (+9% from November to October), whereas Wine and Spirits declined (−40%), with far sharper month‑to‑month movement.
Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in the Wine and Spirits industry across all countries reveal a market that is generally cheaper than the global average but markedly more volatile, with a dramatic January surge, a deep Q2 trough, and a late‑summer rebound. Understanding cost‑per‑lead patterns for Wine and Spirits worldwide helps teams assess industry ad performance and compare global, country‑agnostic ad costs against broader market trends.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app