Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Wine and Spirits

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Wine and Spirits

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Wine and Spirits lead costs moved on a different rhythm than the market. The category generally ran cheaper than the global Facebook Ads benchmark but with far sharper swings: a dramatic spike to $122.73 per lead in January gave way to deep troughs in March, June, and December. Brief surges in late summer interrupted an otherwise choppy year, ending with December at just $6.08. By comparison, the global median moved in a tighter band, peaking in early Q4 and easing into year‑end.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point: $32.45 CPL in December 2024. Ending point: $6.08 in December 2025, an 81% year‑over‑year decrease.
  • Full‑period average (Dec ’24–Dec ’25): $35.33 for Wine and Spirits versus $40.06 globally (about 12% lower).
  • Highs and lows: the category peaked at $122.73 in January and bottomed at $4.91 in June. That’s a 118‑point range. The global range was far tighter ($32.53–$48.41).
  • Volatility: month‑to‑month movement averaged 35.4 points for Wine and Spirits—roughly equal to the category’s average CPL—versus just 3.9 points for the global benchmark (about 9x more volatile).

The year unfolded in distinct waves. After the January spike, CPL fell 86% into February and another 71% into March ($4.96). April–May stabilized around the mid‑$30s, then June dipped to the year’s low ($4.91). A mid‑summer rally lifted CPL to $66.13 in August and $55.70 in September before sliding to $22.96 in October, rebounding to $41.17 in November, and collapsing to $6.08 in December.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

  • Q1: Elevated primarily by January’s surge; average $48.21. The quarter closed with March at one of the year’s lowest points.
  • Q2: Softer overall; average $24.68, with a pronounced June trough.
  • Q3: Rebound; average $45.99, led by August–September strength.
  • Q4: Uneven; average $23.40, with a steep drop into December despite typical end‑of‑year competitive pressure seen elsewhere.

By contrast, the global benchmark followed a steadier seasonal arc: Q1 at $35.94, a gradual climb through Q2–Q3 (peaking at $48.41 in October), and a controlled cool‑off into December ($32.53).

Country vs. Global

Wine and Spirits across all countries underperformed the global benchmark in roughly three‑quarters of months, averaging 11–12% below market for 2025 ($35.57 vs. $40.19). The gap narrowed to just 6% below in April, widened to 88% below in June, and flipped above market during three moments: January (+252%), August (+54%), and September (+16%). Where the global trend rose steadily (+16% from Q1 to Q3), the category’s trajectory was markedly choppier (from a January peak to a March–June trough, then a late‑summer rebound and a December slide). The volatility profile was the clearest separator: Wine and Spirits CPLs moved about nine times more month‑to‑month than the global Facebook Ads benchmark.

Closing

Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in Wine and Spirits across all countries show a market that tends to run below all‑industry costs but with far greater variability—punctuated by a January spike, late‑summer lift, and a sharp December low. Understanding cost‑per‑lead trends for Wine and Spirits across all countries helps teams evaluate industry ad performance against global patterns and assess country‑specific ad costs within a broader CPM and CTR performance context.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.