See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all countries, Agriculture’s Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase (CPP) ran far below the all‑industry global benchmark, but with noticeably sharper month-to-month swings. The period opened in November 2024 in the mid‑teens, surged and dipped through Q1 and Q2, then turned into a Q3 rollercoaster with a July high, August trough, and September rebound. The story is one of relatively low purchase costs but high volatility, with standout inflection points in February, July, August, and September.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Agriculture in all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Agriculture CPP began at $16.10 in November 2024 and ended at $15.71 in October 2025, a slight −2% net change. The full‑period average was $20.26, with a wide range from a low of $10.56 in August 2025 to a high of $35.84 in July 2025. Notable moves include a January dip to $10.68, a February lift to $24.54, and a late‑summer whipsaw: +$10.18 from June to July, then −$25.28 into August and +$22.95 back into September ($33.51).
Month-to-month volatility averaged $11.7, meaning typical swings were more than half the series’ mean CPP—substantially choppier than the global benchmark’s $2.6 average monthly move. Overall, Agriculture’s CPP clustered in the teens and low‑20s for much of the year, interrupted by brief surges in June–July and September.
For context, the global all‑industry CPP averaged $49.33 over the same months, ranging from $42.61 (November 2024) to $53.84 (February 2025). The global line climbed into winter, eased gradually through mid‑year, and finished October at $43.33.
Late 2024 was steady for Agriculture, with November–December holding in the mid‑$16s. Early Q1 softened to January’s $10.68 before rebounding sharply in February ($24.54) and remaining elevated in March ($19.10). Q2 was mixed: April rose ($22.55), May cooled ($12.48), and June lifted again ($25.66).
Q3 showed the most dramatic rhythm. July posted the annual high ($35.84), August sank to the low ($10.56), and September rebounded to $33.51—a compressed cycle of peak–trough–peak within 90 days. By October, CPP reset toward the mid‑teens ($15.71), resembling the prior year’s entry point.
This timing broadly aligns with typical platform dynamics—higher competition around major commercial months, pockets of softer engagement—and sets a clear seasonal cadence for Agriculture’s purchase costs relative to broader Facebook Ads benchmarks.
Agriculture tracked well below global CPP throughout, averaging 59% lower than the all‑industry benchmark. The gap was widest in January (≈80% below), remained large in May (≈76% below) and August (≈79% below), and narrowed materially in July (≈24% below) and September (≈32% below). While the global trend rose modestly across the year (+1.7% from November to October), Agriculture drifted slightly lower (−2.4%), but with far greater amplitude: a $25 range versus the global benchmark’s ~$11 range.
In short, the Agriculture industry delivered consistently lower country-specific ad costs per purchase, paired with more pronounced month-to-month variability than the broader market.
Understanding Facebook Ads cost‑per‑purchase benchmarks for the Agriculture industry across all countries helps marketers situate CPP among complementary CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance. These industry ad performance benchmarks highlight how Agriculture’s purchase costs compare to global patterns over the past year.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Agriculture industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app