Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Agriculture

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Agriculture

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Agriculture’s Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase (CPP) stayed well below the global, all-industry benchmark in 2025, but it moved with far more intensity. The category averaged $19.60 for the year versus a $51.65 global median, with a mid-year surge and repeated whiplash swings that defined the narrative. January opened at a low base, July spiked to the annual high, and Q4 mixed a brief lift with a sharp year-end softening. This combination of low relative costs and high volatility set Agriculture apart from the steadier global baseline.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Agriculture across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Agriculture’s CPP began at $9.44 in January and ended at $12.47 in December, a 32% rise across the year. The annual low landed in January ($9.44), while July marked the peak at $36.06 — nearly 4x January’s level. The year averaged $19.60, but the path was choppy: February jumped to $21.48, March eased to $19.82, April–May cooled near $12, then June–July surged ($27.31 to $36.06). August reset to $12.85, September rebounded to $29.97, October dipped to $17.43, November lifted to $24.09, and December retraced to $12.47.

Volatility was pronounced. Average absolute month-to-month movement in Agriculture reached $10.67, far sharper than the global benchmark’s $1.59. The largest single-month swing came in July→August (−$23.21), with other notable moves in August→September (+$17.12) and May→June (+$14.73).

Globally, the all-industry CPP moved within a tighter band: a $54.77 high in February and a $47.32 low in November, averaging $51.65. The global trend drifted lower across the year (−10% from January to December), contrasting with Agriculture’s mid-year crest and oscillations.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Q1 for Agriculture started soft, then leapt in February and held elevated in March before spring cooled in April–May. The most expensive stretch arrived in early Q3 (June–July), followed by an August reset and a September rebound. Q4 was mixed: October softened, November lifted, and December slid to one of the year’s lower points. By contrast, the global series typically eased into Q4, with November the lowest month of the year and only a modest December uptick.

Country vs. Global

Across all countries, Agriculture’s CPP remained below market every month — on average 62% under the global median ($19.60 vs. $51.65). The gap was narrowest in July (27% below) and widest in January (82% below). While the global benchmark trended gently downward (−10%), Agriculture’s line was more volatile and net positive from start to finish (+32%), driven by the June–July spike and subsequent oscillations. In several months — notably April, May, August, and December — Agriculture trailed the global level by 74–78%, underscoring consistent discounting versus the broader market.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for the Agriculture industry across all countries highlights a market that is structurally below global ad costs yet notably more volatile. These CPP trends offer a clear lens to evaluate industry ad performance and compare country-specific ad costs to global CPM and CTR performance patterns within Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Agriculture industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.