Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Agriculture

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Agriculture

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The headline for Agriculture is cost efficiency with turbulence. Across all countries, Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase (CPP) in the Agriculture industry averaged about $20.3 from November 2024 through October 2025—roughly 59% below the global all‑industry benchmark at $49.5. That discount persisted all year, but the path was anything but smooth: sharp mid‑quarter swings, an unusual Q3 whipsaw, and a flat end-to-start change despite big intra‑year spikes. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Agriculture across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Agriculture CPP started at $16.10 in November 2024 and finished at $15.94 in October 2025—essentially flat (−1%). The yearly average was $20.3, with a low of $10.67 in August (narrowly below January’s $10.68) and a high of $35.84 in July. Seven of the 12 months sat in the mid‑teens to low‑$20s, while the remaining months broke higher, led by July ($35.84) and September ($33.51).

Volatility was the defining feature. Average absolute month‑to‑month movement was $11.6, indicating frequent double‑digit swings. Notable moves included a −35% drop in January, a +130% rebound in February, a −45% slide in May, a +106% jump in June, a −70% reset in August, and a +214% surge into September, followed by a −52% step down in October. The median month across the period landed near $17.8, suggesting a “typical” cost in the high‑teens despite outsized peaks and dips.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality appeared in broad strokes, but with unusual rhythm inside quarters:

  • Q4 (Nov–Dec plus Oct) was subdued, averaging roughly $16.2—the softest stretch of the year.
  • Q1 showed a trough‑then‑recovery pattern: January’s low ($10.68) lifted to $24.54 by February before easing in March ($19.10).
  • Q2 was mixed, moving from $22.55 (April) down to $12.48 (May) before climbing to $25.66 (June).
  • Q3 was the strongest yet choppy: July spiked to $35.84, collapsed to $10.67 in August, and rebounded to $33.51 in September—a V‑shaped surge within the quarter.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global all‑industry CPP benchmark, Agriculture stayed consistently below market. The gap ranged from 24% below (July) to 79% below (January and August). Month by month, Agriculture CPP ran at 21%–76% of global levels, averaging a 59% discount across the year. The global benchmark itself was steadier—mostly in the mid‑$40s to mid‑$50s—starting at $42.73 in November and ending at $45.51 in October (+6.5%). Its month‑to‑month volatility averaged $2.4, making Agriculture nearly five times more volatile than the global trend.

In short, the Agriculture industry across all countries combined sustained notably lower country‑specific ad costs for purchases versus the global baseline, but with larger, faster swings—particularly around Q3.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Purchase in the Agriculture industry across all countries highlights a data‑rich picture: CPP trends that are structurally lower than global norms yet markedly more volatile. These CPP patterns provide a clear reference point for Agriculture industry ad performance relative to global Facebook Ads benchmarks and broader country‑specific ad costs.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Agriculture industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.