See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Argentina’s cost-per-purchase (CPP) profile in 2025 reads as a low-cost market punctuated by two dramatic spikes. Across most reported months, Argentina sat well below the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, with a sharp surge in April and a secondary jump in July breaking an otherwise low-cost rhythm. The result is a choppy year: a soft, inexpensive Q1, an exceptional April shock, a mid-year flare-up, a September trough, and a modest lift into December.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Argentina compared to the global benchmark.
Across the eight reported months, Argentina’s CPP averaged 45.61, ranging from a low of 6.13 in September to a high of 224.15 in April. The median was far lower at 13.39, signaling that a few outliers pulled the average up. Excluding April’s anomaly, the Argentina average drops to 20.10—roughly 60% below the same-month global average.
The year opened inexpensively: 6.28 in January, 8.20 in February, and 11.15 in March. April then spiked to 224.15—over four times the global level that month—before retracing to 15.62 in May. After a gap, July rose again to 74.08, September fell to the year’s low (6.13), and December ended at 19.25. From January to December, CPP was up roughly 206%, though the mid-year swings dominate that headline change.
Volatility between reported points averaged 80.85, reflecting large step changes driven by April and July. Even excluding April-related moves, average step changes still measured 28.88—well above typical global movement.
Q1 in Argentina was consistently low-cost, with CPP averaging 8.55—an extended trough that preceded April’s exceptional spike. May reset the trend lower, but the mid-year was not settled: July climbed sharply before a pronounced drop in September. December lifted from Q3 levels yet remained below global norms. The rhythm contrasts with the more typical seasonal pattern seen globally, where CPP stayed relatively even through most of the year and softened modestly into November–December.
Relative to the global benchmark, Argentina averaged 51.96 across the same reported months, versus 45.61 locally—about 12% lower on average. Six of eight reported months were below market, often by wide margins: January (−88%), February (−85%), March (−79%), May (−70%), September (−89%), and December (−60%). Two months broke that pattern: April landed 328% above the global benchmark and July sat 51% above it.
Month-to-month stability also differed markedly. Globally, CPP moved gently, with an average absolute change of about 1.59 points across 2025. Argentina’s pattern was far more volatile, reflecting intermittent surges and swift reversals rather than a steady trend.
In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase in all industries show Argentina as a generally low-cost, high-variability market in 2025—well below global levels in most months but punctuated by rare, outsized spikes. Understanding these country-specific ad costs and how they diverge from global industry ad performance provides useful context for interpreting CPP trends alongside broader CPM analysis and CTR performance benchmarks for Argentina.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Argentina, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
December (Christmas period)
CPM might rise significantly during Carnival, Independence Day, and Christmas season. Retail and entertainment campaigns could require increased budgets.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app