Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Argentina

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Argentina

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all industries in Argentina, cost per purchase moved through a year of extremes—an early-year collapse, a dramatic April spike, and a late‑Q3 reset—resulting in an average that sits just below the global benchmark but hides unusually sharp swings. While the global market held a tight, steady range, Argentina’s pattern was punctuated by a single outlier month that defined the narrative. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Argentina compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Argentina’s cost per purchase (CPP) begins at 45.72 in November 2024 and ends at 7.40 in September 2025, an 84% decline across the available period. The average over the nine reported months lands at 47.29, but that mean is lifted by a singular April surge; the median experience through most of the year was far lower.

Highs and lows are stark: a low of 6.28 in January 2025 and a peak of 224.15 in April—over a 35x swing. Month to month, the market was highly choppy, averaging 71.8 points of absolute movement, driven by a 213‑point rise from March to April and a 209‑point retracement into May. The early rhythm: a modest step down from November to December (−10%), a sharp January trough (−85% vs December), then incremental lifts in February and March (8.20 and 11.15). April breaks the pattern with a sudden spike to 224.15, followed by a reset to 15.62 in May. Mid‑year nudges higher to 65.72 in July before another reset to 7.40 by September.

Globally, the same period was far steadier. The worldwide CPP averaged 50.01 across overlapping months, ranging from 42.61 to 53.84, with modest month‑to‑month volatility of 2.6 points.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the global benchmark exhibits familiar steadiness through Q1–Q3, with costs clustering near 48–54 and only mild mid‑year softening. Argentina, by contrast, shows an amplified Q1 trough—January to March stayed in the single to low double digits—then an anomalous April spike, a partial normalization in May, and a brief mid‑year lift in July before a pronounced September reset. The pattern reads as a low‑cost Q1, an outlier in April, and a reversion to low CPP by late Q3.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, Argentina alternated between deep discounts and brief premiums:

  • November: +7% above global (45.72 vs 42.61) — the tightest gap.
  • December: 17% below.
  • January to March: 79–88% below, with January and September both about 85% below global.
  • April: +334% above global (224.15 vs 51.61) — the year’s defining outlier.
  • May: 70% below.
  • July: 39% above.
  • September: 85% below.

Across the nine shared months, Argentina’s average (47.29) was about 5% below the global 50.01. Excluding April’s outlier, Argentina averaged 25.18—roughly 50% below global levels. Volatility was the distinguishing feature: Argentina’s month‑to‑month swings were roughly 28 times larger than the global pattern.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase in all industries in Argentina show a market marked by a deep Q1 trough, a singular April surge, and repeated reversion to low CPP, contrasting with the globally steady range. For country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance, this CPP view sits alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, helping situate Argentina’s all‑industry acquisition costs against global expectations.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Argentina, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Argentina Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 3‑4Carnival
Mar 24Truth & Justice Memorial
Apr 2Malvinas Day
Apr 18Good Friday
May 1Labour Day
May 25May Revolution Day
Jun 16Martín Miguel de Güemes Day
Jun 20Flag Day
Jul 9Independence Day
Aug 18San Martín Memorial Day
Oct 13Cultural Diversity Day
Nov 24National Sovereignty Day
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas

Key Shopping Season

December (Christmas period)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM might rise significantly during Carnival, Independence Day, and Christmas season. Retail and entertainment campaigns could require increased budgets.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.