See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all countries, the Arts industry ran hot for most of 2025 before an abrupt reset at year’s end. Cost per Purchase (CPP) climbed into mid-year highs, then swung sharply lower in November and again in January 2026. Compared to the global benchmark across all industries, Arts was pricier and far more volatile, with wider month-to-month swings and a steeper final drop. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for the Arts industry across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Arts CPP opened 2025 at $56.34 and closed January 2026 at $11.81, a 79% decline across the period. The year’s average (Jan–Dec 2025) landed at $61.79, with a full-period average of $57.95. The high point was July 2025 at $79.20; the low arrived in January 2026 at $11.81, creating a $67 range.
Momentum defined the year. A modest lift in February (+$0.19) gave way to a March surge to $70.73, followed by a sharp April reset to $39.84 (−44% vs March). From there, CPP accelerated: May and June both topped $71, culminating in a July peak near $79. After a tempered August–October plateau around the high-$60s, CPP collapsed in November to $26.69 (−61% vs October), then whipsawed back to $64.40 in December (+141% vs November) before re-basing to $11.81 in January 2026 (−82% vs December).
Volatility was the defining feature: average absolute month-to-month change was $19.30 for Arts, versus just $3.33 for the global benchmark—roughly six times more turbulent.
The year’s rhythm tracked a classic mid-year lift, with Q3 averaging $71.67—the strongest quarter. Q1 and Q2 were similar ($61.20 and $60.95), indicating a steady run-in to the summer peak. Q4 softened to a $53.35 average, but that figure masks extremes: a late-October plateau, a deep November trough, and a December rebound before the January reset. In many markets, Q4 competition increases and costs can move, but in the Arts roll-up the November contraction was unusually pronounced, with a quick December bounce preceding a sharper-than-usual January cooldown.
Relative to the global CPP benchmark, the Arts industry averaged 20% higher through 2025 ($61.79 vs $51.65) and 17% higher across the full period ($57.95 vs $49.62). Arts outpaced the market in 10 of 12 months of 2025, with the tightest gap in February (+3% vs global) and the widest positive spread in July (+61%). There were notable underperformances: April (−24% vs global), November (−44%), and January 2026 (−53%). Directionally, the global series drifted in a narrow band through most of 2025 and then declined 53% from January 2025 to January 2026; the Arts series was choppier, ultimately falling 79% across the same span. The Arts range ($79.20 high to $11.81 low) more than doubled the global range ($54.77 to $25.15), underscoring how industry-specific ad costs can diverge from all-industry Facebook Ads benchmarks.
In short, Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase benchmarks for the Arts industry across all countries show a high-cost, high-volatility profile in 2025, with a pronounced mid-year peak and dramatic Q4–Q1 swings. While CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance often dominate performance conversations, this CPP view highlights how industry ad performance diverges from global averages and how country-specific ad costs roll up into a markedly more dynamic Arts benchmark. Understanding Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase benchmarks for the Arts industry across all countries helps marketers gauge how 2025’s swings compared to global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Arts industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app