Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Arts

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Arts

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase (CPP) for the Arts industry ran hotter and far choppier than the global all‑industry benchmark for most of the year—surging through midsummer before a dramatic November correction. The pattern shows a soft Q4 2024 baseline, a strong lift through Q1–Q3 2025, and then a sudden break lower in November. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Arts across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Arts CPP opened at $38.71 in November 2024 and dipped to $31.60 in December—its early trough—before climbing sharply to $56.34 in January and $70.73 in March. April retraced to $41.01, then costs rebounded: $71.72 in May, $70.79 in June, and a cycle high of $79.47 in July. A gradual comedown followed—$68.68 in August, $59.11 in September, $57.64 in October—before a steep drop to $4.30 in November 2025, the period’s low.

Over the full window, Arts CPP averaged $54.36. Through October (before the November break), it averaged a much higher $63.20. Volatility was pronounced: the average absolute month‑over‑month move was about $16, with several double‑digit swings and a July peak that stood nearly 2.5× above the March level and more than double the Q4 2024 average.

By contrast, the global all‑industry benchmark averaged $48.06, peaking at $53.81 in February and bottoming at $30.61 in November 2025. The global series moved far more smoothly, with average monthly swings of roughly $3.45.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The seasonal rhythm is clear. Q4 2024 was softer for Arts ($35.16 average across November–December), followed by a strong Q1 surge (averaging $61.20) that carried into Q2 ($61.17) and crested in Q3 ($69.09), a period often marked by steadier conversion efficiency for certain verticals. Q4 2025 to date flipped the script: October held at $57.64, then November fell sharply to $4.30, pulling the quarter-to-date average down to $15.48. The global benchmark showed a gentler arc—steady around $48–54 through Q1–Q3—then eased into Q4 with a step down in October and a bigger drop in November.

Country vs. Global

Arts sat above the global benchmark in 9 of 13 months. The premium was modest in January–February (+5–8%), then widened materially from May through October (+19% to +70%), with the gap peaking in July when Arts CPP was 70% above the global level. The narrowest gaps appeared in late 2024, when Arts trailed the global average in November (−9%) and December (−37%), and again in April 2025 (−20%). November 2025 flipped to a deep discount (−86%) as Arts CPP collapsed while the global series merely softened.

Trend-wise, the global benchmark drifted lower across the year (−13% from January to October), while Arts was choppier but essentially flat over that span (+2%), reflecting higher highs and deeper interim dips. On average, Arts cost-per-purchase was 13% above the global benchmark across the period—and 26% higher through October.

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for the Arts industry across all countries show a high‑volatility, above‑market profile through most of 2025, punctuated by a sharp November reset. Understanding these CPP trends within global Facebook Ads benchmarks helps frame industry ad performance and country‑specific ad costs against broader market patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Arts industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.