Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Brazil

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Brazil

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Brazil’s cost per purchase (CPP) tells a year-long story of extremes: a sharp surge early in the year, mid-year cooling, a brief rebound, and then an extraordinary slide to near-zero in December. Compared to the global benchmark, Brazil oscillated between well above market and well below, with deeper swings and a much wider spread than typical Facebook Ads benchmarks. The standout moments: a peak at 84 in February and an anomalously low 0.21 in December, which pulled the annual average down.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Brazil compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Brazil started 2025 with a CPP of 30.43 in January and climbed rapidly to its annual high of 84.07 in February. The elevated run held through spring—71.77 in March and 74.15 in April—before moderating to the low 60s in May and mid‑60s in June. A mid-year reset followed: July fell to 30.87 (−54% vs June) and August dipped further to 19.11. Momentum returned in September (61.49) and October (65.09), only to break sharply in November (16.38) and then plunge in December to 0.21.

Across the year, Brazil’s CPP averaged 48.55. Excluding December’s outlier, the January–November average lands at 52.95. The range was exceptionally wide—0.21 at the low, 84.07 at the high. Month-over-month volatility averaged about 22 points, reflecting large swings such as +54 points from January to February, −36 points in July, +42 points in September, and −49 points in November.

Globally, the pattern was steadier: an annual average of 51.40, a gentle glide from 53.25 in January to 45.08 in December (−15% over the year), and minimal volatility at roughly 1.8 points month to month.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The year split cleanly into phases for Brazil:

  • Q1 was strong, averaging 62 as CPP rose sharply into February and stayed elevated in March.
  • Q2 held that higher plateau (average 67.7), the most expensive quarter for purchases.
  • Q3 softened (average 37.2), with July–August marking the year’s mid-cycle trough before a September–October rebound.
  • Q4 turned decisively lower (average 27.2), punctuated by November’s drop and December’s record low.

Global seasonality was more muted: Q1 averaged 53.7, Q2 51.9, Q3 51.8, and Q4 48.3—consistent with a gradual year-end softening often seen as competition shifts and budgets evolve.

Brazil vs. Global

Brazil spent seven months above the global CPP (February–June, September, October) and five months below (January, July, August, November, December). The gaps were sizable in both directions:

  • Above market: +53% in February, +42% in April, +32% in June, +24% in October.
  • Below market: −43% in January, −64% in August, −65% in November, and −99% in December.

At its narrowest, the gap was September, where Brazil sat 16% above the global benchmark. At its widest, December’s CPP was 99% below global. Brazil’s volatility (≈22 points monthly) was roughly 12x the global benchmark, underscoring a choppier, more dramatic year. Overall, Brazil averaged 48.6 for 2025 versus 51.4 globally (−6%), with the December anomaly materially weighing down the annual mean.

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Brazil—alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps frame country-specific ad costs against global patterns and spot how Brazil’s CPP diverged from the steadier worldwide trend.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Brazil, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Brazil Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 3–4Carnival
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Tiradentes Day
May 1Labour Day
Jun 19Corpus Christi
Sep 7Independence Day
Oct 12Our Lady of Aparecida (Children's Day)
Nov 2All Souls' Day
Nov 15Republic Proclamation Day
Nov 20Black Awareness Day
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

December (Christmas), Late November (Black Friday), Children's Day (Oct 12)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise around Carnival and Independence Day due to increased social activity. Children's Day (Oct 12) and Black Friday could see sharp spikes in competition. December (Christmas) may surge e‑commerce traffic, prompting high CPMs. Extended holiday weekends could shift ad engagement patterns.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.