See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all industries in Brazil, Facebook Ads cost per purchase (CPP) traced a stop-and-start year: softer in late 2024, a sharp lift through early Q2 2025, a mid-year trough, and a dramatic rebound as spring turned to fall. On average, Brazil ran above the global benchmark while swinging far more sharply month to month. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Brazil compared to the global benchmark.
Brazil opened the period at 35.4 in November 2024 and closed at 71.0 in October 2025—an increase of roughly 101%. The year’s low arrived in August at 19.1, while the high came in April at 76.5. The full-year average CPP for Brazil was 53.5, versus 49.3 globally.
The path between those endpoints was notably choppy. After three comparatively lean months (29.6–35.4 from December–January), CPP surged 140% from January to February (30.4 to 73.0), then pushed higher into April’s peak (76.5). Costs eased but remained elevated in May–June (62.2–66.8). Mid-year volatility then intensified: a 54% drop from June to July (66.8 to 30.9), a deeper trough in August (19.1), and a near tripling month over month into September (+293%, 19.1 to 75.2) before settling slightly lower in October (71.0).
Volatility tells the same story. Brazil’s average absolute month-to-month move was 16.5 points, roughly six times the global swing of 2.6 points. The global series ran far steadier, ranging from 42.6 in November to a peak of 53.8 in February and easing to 43.3 by October.
Seasonally, Brazil displayed a pronounced late Q1/early Q2 spike: February–April formed a high plateau, consistent with a period of elevated demand and tighter auction dynamics. May–June held above the annual average, then July–August marked the year’s soft spot with CPP hitting its trough in August. The rebound was swift in early fall, with September–October nearly matching the earlier spring highs.
Globally, CPP crested in February and softened gradually into October—an arc that aligns with post-holiday normalization and steadier competition. Compared to this baseline rhythm, Brazil’s pattern shared the early-year lift but magnified every phase: softer lows in Q4 and midsummer, and higher highs in spring and early fall.
On average, Brazil’s CPP ran about 8% above the global benchmark (53.5 vs. 49.3). The gap, however, shifted dramatically over the year. Brazil trailed the market in November–January and again in July–August, with the widest underperformance in August (62% below global). It moved above market from February through June and again in September–October, peaking at a 64% premium in October. The tightest spread was in November, when Brazil sat 17% below the global median.
Where the global line advanced modestly from November to October (+1.7%) within a narrow 11.2-point range, Brazil covered a 57.4-point range and doubled its starting level by period end. In short, the country-specific ad costs in Brazil were higher on average and substantially more volatile than the global Facebook Ads benchmarks.
Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Brazil—how CPP surged in late Q1, dipped mid-year, and rebounded into the fall—helps teams gauge country-specific ad costs and compare industry ad performance to global patterns. This CPP analysis provides a clear baseline for Brazil relative to worldwide Facebook Ads benchmarks.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Brazil, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
December (Christmas), Late November (Black Friday), Children's Day (Oct 12)
CPM and CPC might rise around Carnival and Independence Day due to increased social activity. Children's Day (Oct 12) and Black Friday could see sharp spikes in competition. December (Christmas) may surge e‑commerce traffic, prompting high CPMs. Extended holiday weekends could shift ad engagement patterns.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app