Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Construction

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Construction

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Construction shows a high-cost, high-volatility pattern for Facebook Ads purchase outcomes. Cost Per Purchase (CPP) averaged $169 over the past 12 months, far above the global benchmark’s $49, with a dramatic March spike followed by a steady slide into October. The year opened elevated in December, surged into March, then cooled quarter by quarter, ending at the yearly low. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Construction across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Construction CPP began at $129 in November 2024 and landed at $92 in October 2025, a 29% decline end to end. The high point came in March at $314—more than triple the starting level—while October marked the low at $92. Across the period, CPP averaged $169, ranging from $92 to $315.

Month-to-month shifts were pronounced. December jumped by $106 versus November, and February to March lifted another $161 to the peak. The sharpest pullback followed in April (−$123), after which costs normalized and drifted down in smaller steps through summer. Average absolute monthly volatility was $54, roughly 32% of the average CPP—21 times the global benchmark’s monthly swing of about $2.6 (near 5% of its average).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the rhythm was clear:

  • Q4 2024 ran elevated, averaging $183, with December at $236.
  • Q1 2025 held steady in January–February before a March breakout to $315, the period’s top.
  • Q2 2025 retrenched to a tighter $169–$192 band (average $183).
  • Q3 2025 compressed further, averaging $134 with three months clustered near $130–$137.
  • Early Q4 2025 cooled sharply: October fell to $92, the low for the year.

This contour—strength into late Q4, a Q1/March crest, and a gradual step-down into Q3–Q4—is consistent with competitive cycles often seen in paid social. While CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance describe upper-funnel movements, the CPP lens here highlights the downstream cost required to convert purchases in Construction across all countries.

Country vs. Global

Construction’s CPP across all countries consistently sat above market. On average it was 3.4x the global benchmark (+242%). The gap was widest in March (6.0x: $315 vs. $52) and narrowest in October (2.1x: $92 vs. $43). By contrast, the global benchmark was flat to slightly positive over the same window: it started at $42.61 and finished at $43.33 (+2%). The global high was a modest $53.84 in February, with a $42.61 low in November—an $11 range versus Construction’s $223 range, underscoring how much more volatile Construction purchase costs were across all countries.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Purchase in the Construction industry across all countries show a pronounced March peak, broad seasonality, and substantially higher, more volatile country-agnostic ad costs versus the global benchmark. Understanding CPP benchmarks—alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps frame industry ad performance and compare country-specific ad costs to global patterns for Construction.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Construction industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.