Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Construction

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Construction

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Facebook Ads cost per purchase for the Construction industry ran well above market levels in 2025, with a sharp Q1 spike and a steady cool-down into Q4. The standout month was March, where costs surged before easing through the rest of the year. Volatility was notably higher than the global benchmark, creating a choppy cost profile even as the year finished slightly below where it began.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Construction across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Construction’s global cost per purchase opened at $137 in January and closed at $130 in December, a modest 5% decline across the year. The clear outlier was March at $282—nearly double February—followed by a sharp correction in April to $177. From there, CPP drifted down to an October low of $114 before a mild rebound to $137 in November and $130 in December.

Across 2025, Construction’s CPP averaged $158, ranging from $114 (October) to $282 (March)—a $167 spread. Month to month, absolute changes averaged $35.8, with the biggest swings concentrated around the Q1 peak (+$138 from February to March, then −$105 from March to April). By contrast, the global all-industry benchmark was far steadier.

For the global benchmark, CPP averaged $51.65 in 2025, with a narrow band of movement—from $47.32 (November) to $54.77 (February). Month-to-month shifts averaged just $1.6, underscoring how much more turbulent Construction’s country-aggregated costs were.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm of the year was front-loaded. Q1 averaged $188 for Construction, lifted by March’s spike. After that, CPP moderated each quarter: Q2 averaged $173, Q3 fell to $144, and Q4 softened further to $127, with October marking the trough. The late-year pattern showed a slight rebound in November before a gentle dip into December.

The global all-industry trend also eased as the year progressed, though more smoothly: Q1 averaged $53.6, Q2 and Q3 hovered around $51.9, and Q4 dipped to $49.3—the low point for the benchmark. In short, both series cooled over time, but Construction’s path included a pronounced early spike and steeper midyear swings.

Country vs. Global

Construction’s CPP across all countries sat consistently above the global benchmark. The average gap was about 205% (Construction at $158 vs. global at $51.65). The narrowest gap appeared in October, when Construction was still 116% above market ($114 vs. $52.80). The widest divergence was in March, when Construction exceeded the benchmark by 432% ($282 vs. $52.92).

Trend-wise, Construction ended the year 5% below January, while the global benchmark fell about 10% over the same period—so the category cooled slightly less than the market overall. Volatility was the clearest differentiator: Construction’s month-to-month changes averaged $35.8 compared with the global benchmark’s $1.6, indicating materially choppier cost dynamics in this industry.

Closing

These Facebook Ads benchmarks show that cost-per-purchase in the Construction industry across all countries remained substantially above the global norm in 2025, with a dramatic March high and a steady glide lower into Q4. For teams tracking country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance, this CPP analysis clarifies how Construction’s costs diverge from broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, and how those patterns evolved month by month on a global basis. Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for the Construction industry across all countries helps quantify the gap to the global market and the volatility shaping acquisition costs.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Construction industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.