Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Construction

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Construction

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Construction’s cost-per-purchase (CPP) runs decisively above market, with pronounced seasonal surges and sharp corrections. Across all countries, the Construction industry’s CPP averaged about $158.94 over the last 13 months, roughly 3.3x the global, all‑industry benchmark at $48.06. The year was defined by a dramatic Q1 crest—peaking in March—followed by a steady cool‑down into October and a modest rebound in November. Volatility was a standout feature, with big leaps in late Q4 and early Q1 and a threefold swing between the annual high and low. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Construction in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Construction CPP opened at $136.86 in November 2024 and ended at $115.16 in November 2025, a 16% decline across the period. The high point was March 2025 at $278.67, and the low arrived in October at $92.77—nearly a 3x spread between peak and trough. The median month felt expensive: the category’s average of $158.94 far exceeds broader market levels.

Monthly movement told a choppy story. CPP jumped $98.87 from November to December ($235.73), then gave most of it back in January (−$98.66). After a small lift in February, March surged another $131.61 to the annual high. The market corrected in April (−$102.02), hovered near flat through May, and began a gradual softening through summer. August ($129.17) and September ($135.04) were relatively stable before an October trough ($92.77) and a late‑season rebound in November (+$22.40 to $115.16). On average, month‑to‑month Construction CPP shifted by $46.74—about 29% of its mean—indicating a notably volatile acquisition environment.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality was pronounced. Late Q4 and early Q1 ran elevated (December at $235.73), with momentum cresting in March. Mid‑year costs cooled, with a flatter rhythm across August and September. Q4 softened markedly into October’s low, then rebounded in November—mirroring a common pattern where competition and demand dynamics reshape acquisition efficiency through the holiday period and into the new year.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, Construction’s CPP stayed “above market” every month. The gap ranged from a narrow 2.0x in October to a wide 5.3x in March, with most months holding between 2.6x and 3.5x. On averages, Construction was about 231% higher than the global norm ($158.94 vs. $48.06). The global benchmark itself trended lower across the period—down 28% from November 2024 ($42.73) to November 2025 ($30.61)—and moved with far less turbulence: an average absolute monthly shift of just $3.45 (around 7% of its mean), versus Construction’s $46.74.

In the broader landscape of Facebook Ads benchmarks—spanning CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—Construction’s cost‑per‑purchase stands out as both elevated and more volatile globally. Understanding Facebook Ads cost‑per‑purchase benchmarks for the Construction industry across all countries helps advertisers evaluate acquisition cost trends and compare performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Construction industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.