Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Consumer Goods

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Consumer Goods

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Consumer Goods purchase costs ran consistently above the global benchmark for most of 2025, then compressed sharply into Q4 before stabilizing at the start of 2026. The year opened expensive and choppy, eased through midyear, and ended with the lowest Cost Per Purchase (CPP) of the period — a clear downtrend from January’s peak to December’s trough. Volatility was notably higher than the market overall, with a steeper Q4 swing and a rare divergence in January 2026 when the global median dropped dramatically while Consumer Goods held steady.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consumer Goods across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to endpoint: CPP for Consumer Goods across all countries fell from $61.36 in January 2025 to $43.89 in December, a 29% decline. January 2026 ticked up slightly to $44.48.
  • Highs and lows: The yearly high was January 2025 ($61.36); the low was December ($43.89). October ($57.06) marked the last elevated month before a steep Q4 slide.
  • Average levels: In 2025, CPP averaged $53.7 for Consumer Goods versus a $51.7 global average — about 4% higher than the all-industry baseline.
  • Key movements: After a strong Q1 (avg $59.6), costs moderated through midyear, then dropped hard in November (−$10.91 month over month), settling at the annual low in December.

Volatility stood out. Average monthly absolute movement for Consumer Goods was $3.39 versus $1.59 for the global benchmark, indicating sharper month-to-month swings. The tightest alignment occurred in late summer: August ($53.28) and September ($53.48) matched the market almost exactly. The widest divergence within 2025 came in January (+15% above market), while November (−3%) and December (−8%) flipped below the global level.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm of the year looked classic early, with elevated costs in Q1 and a measured cooldown in Q2. Q3 held steady near $52–53, hovering close to global levels. The biggest break in the pattern landed in Q4: October remained firm at $57.06, then November and December saw a swift compression to the year’s low. January 2026 showed a modest rebound to $44.48 for Consumer Goods, even as the broader market receded unusually fast.

Country vs. Global

Relative to Facebook Ads benchmarks across all industries, Consumer Goods across all countries stayed above market for most of 2025:

  • Averages: $53.7 (Consumer Goods) vs. $51.7 (global).
  • Quarterly shape: Q1 ran ~11% above global; Q2 hovered ~3% higher; Q3 narrowed to ~1–2% higher; Q4 slipped slightly below global (−0.4% on average).
  • Gap dynamics: The narrowest gap appeared in August–September (near parity). The widest positive gap was in January (+15%); the widest negative gap came in December (−8%).
  • Early 2026 divergence: January 2026 landed at $44.48 for Consumer Goods while the global benchmark fell to $25.15, putting Consumer Goods roughly 77% above the market — a sharp spread driven by an atypical market-level drop.

Closing

Overall, Facebook Ads benchmarks show Consumer Goods Cost Per Purchase across all countries running higher than the global market through most of 2025, with greater volatility and a pronounced Q4 reset before a steadier start to 2026. Understanding Cost Per Purchase trends for the Consumer Goods industry across all countries helps marketers read country-specific ad costs and compare performance to global Facebook Ads patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consumer Goods industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.