Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Consumer Goods in Norway

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Consumer Goods in Norway

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Key takeaways

  • Consumer Goods in Norway shows a lower cost per purchase than the global baseline overall: 41.99 vs 47.82, about 12% below market.
  • Volatility in Norway is high (average absolute month-to-month change ~19%), compared with ~7% in the global trend.
  • Costs rose 36.5% from October 2024 to September 2025 in Norway, while the global baseline fell 30.8% over the same period.
  • Norway was below the global median in 9 of 12 months, but spiked above market in April, May, and September.
  • Seasonal signals diverge from typical Q4 pressure: Norway’s largest surge appears in April, with a pronounced dip in July, then a sharp rebuild into September.

This analysis looks at cost per purchase trends for industry Consumer Goods and target country Norway compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

Trend highlights for Consumer Goods in Norway

  • Average, high, low:
  • Average: 41.99
  • High: 58.27 (April 2025)
  • Low: 31.30 (January 2025)
  • Momentum:
  • First to last month: +36.5% (35.31 in Oct 2024 to 48.18 in Sep 2025)
  • Notable spikes/dips:
  • +42.5% MoM in April (March to April)
  • -26.3% MoM in July (June to July)
  • Other sizable shifts: +29.0% in February; +20.2% in August; +18.7% in September
  • Volatility: Average absolute MoM change ~19%, indicating a relatively choppy cost environment.

Seasonality notes:

  • Q4: Costs rose into November but eased in December, diverging from the classic year-end run-up.
  • Q1: January set the annual low, then costs rebounded into February/March.
  • Q2: A sharp April peak dominated the year.
  • Q3: A July trough was followed by steady gains into September.

Comparison to the global baseline

  • Baseline (all industries/countries) average: 47.82, with a high of 53.89 (February 2025) and a low of 32.29 (September 2025).
  • Baseline trend: -30.8% from October 2024 (46.67) to September 2025 (32.29).
  • Baseline volatility: ~7% average absolute MoM change, much steadier than Norway’s 19%.
  • Relative positioning by month:
  • Norway below market in most months, notably:
  • January (-40% vs baseline), December (-32%), March (-22%), February (-25%), July (-27%), October (-24%).
  • Above market in:
  • April (+13%), May (+1.5%), September (+49%).
  • Seasonal contrast:
  • The baseline shows elevated costs in December–February and a sharp dip in September.
  • Norway’s pattern centers on an April surge, mid-year softness, and a strong late-Q3 rise—less aligned with the baseline’s Q4/Q1 pressure.

What this means for benchmarking

Norway’s Consumer Goods cost per purchase is generally below average but markedly more volatile than the global trend. The standout April spike and the July trough define the period, with a strong recovery into September, while the baseline finishes the year with an atypical September dip.

Understanding cost-per-purchase benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Consumer Goods and Norway helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consumer Goods industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Norway, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Norway Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 17Constitution Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Singles Day), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), Spring holiday period (April–May travel and tourism)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter and Ascension when Norwegians travel or spend time on leisure. Constitution Day (May 17) is widely celebrated—media activity may increase and ad competition could intensify. Most public holidays result in shop closures; ad inventory may shrink during holidays. Pentecost weekend may reduce weekday competition.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.