Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Denmark

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Denmark

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

All industries in Denmark posted a whiplash year for Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase (CPP): a quiet start, two outsized spikes in late winter and spring, and a dramatic slide into October. Despite ending the period at its lowest point, Denmark’s CPP spent most months far above the global benchmark, with volatility that dwarfed the steadier global trend. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Denmark compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across the observed window (Nov 2024–Oct 2025), Denmark’s CPP began at 27.44 in November and finished at 11.54 in October, a 58% decline end-to-end. In between, the market swung from a high of 1,724.69 in April to that 11.54 October low. The period average landed at 343, heavily skewed by the April and February surges (1,187.52 in February). A median month in Denmark was 111.51, and a trimmed average excluding February and April comes to roughly 96 — still about double the global level.

Month-to-month moves underscore the turbulence. Denmark’s average absolute monthly change was approximately 583 points, versus just 2.54 points globally — more than 200× greater volatility. Nine of the 11 observed months ran above the market, with especially sharp overhangs in February (+2,106% vs. global) and April (+3,244%). The narrowest gaps came at the bookends: November was 36% below the global benchmark, and October was 73% below.

Globally, CPP remained compact, averaging about 49 across the same months (range: roughly 43–54) and finishing only 2% higher than where it started. That steadiness throws Denmark’s amplitude into sharp relief.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

  • Q4 2024: Denmark advanced from 27.44 in November to 56.48 in December, while global CPP held near the low‑50s.
  • Q1 2025: The pulse quickened — 154.47 in January, a surge to 1,187.52 in February, then a comedown to 111.51 in March.
  • Q2 2025: A new peak in April (1,724.69), followed by a retrace to 72.49 in May and a rebound to 207.88 in June.
  • Q3 2025: Mid-range levels returned, with 145.96 in July and 77.64 in September.
  • Q4 kickoff: October collapsed to 11.54, the period low.

While global CPP typically moves within a narrow band and often softens toward late Q3–Q4, Denmark’s pattern featured sharp surges in late winter and spring and an unusually deep drop at the start of Q4.

Denmark vs. Global

  • Average level: Denmark 343 vs. global 49 (+597%). Using medians, Denmark 111.51 vs. global 49 (+127%).
  • Relative performance: Above-market in 9 of 11 months; the widest premium came in April (~33× global).
  • Trend shape: The global series edged upward slightly (+2%), while Denmark’s line was far choppier (−58% from first to last month).
  • Volatility: Denmark’s month-to-month swings were over 200× larger than the global benchmark.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase show Denmark’s all-industries market oscillating between brief under-market lows and prolonged, pronounced premiums versus the world. Understanding cost-per-purchase benchmarks — alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance — helps clarify country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance. This snapshot grounds Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Denmark against the global pattern.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Denmark, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Denmark Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Christmas & Boxing Day (late Dec), Easter holidays (groceries, travel, tourism), Mother's Day and Valentine's Day

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter period due to travel-related campaigns. Late December ad competition might intensify in retail and hospitality. Whit Weekend might reduce weekday competition. Strict retail closures on holidays could drop competition, but pre-holiday CPMs may escalate.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.