Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Denmark

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Denmark

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

All-industries Cost Per Purchase in Denmark moved through the past year with dramatic swings that diverged sharply from the calm, steady global benchmark. The Danish series featured two outsized spikes in February and April before cooling into late Q3 and reaching a new low in October. Across the same months, the global baseline held in a tight band around the high‑40s, underscoring how unusually volatile country-specific ad costs were in Denmark.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Denmark compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Denmark’s Cost Per Purchase opened at 27.44 in November 2024 and closed at 11.76 in October 2025, a 57% decline end‑to‑end despite extreme mid‑period surges. The series averaged 344 over the period, but that mean is heavily skewed by two peaks: 1,187 in February and an even higher 1,725 in April. Excluding those two outliers, Denmark’s average settles at about 97, and the median across all months is 112 — still roughly double the global backdrop.

The month-to-month rhythm was turbulent. After December rose to 56.48, January lifted again to 154.47, then February leapt more than sevenfold to 1,187. March fell back to 111.51 (−91% MoM), only to surge to a new high in April at 1,725. From there the series normalized: 72.49 in May, 207.88 in June, 145.96 in July, 85.90 in September, and finally 11.76 in October — the lowest reading of the year. On average, absolute month-over-month moves in Denmark were about 292%, versus roughly 5% for the global benchmark, highlighting a market that was more volatile by an order of magnitude.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Q1 in Denmark was anything but routine: January rose sharply, February spiked to a record, and March retraced most of that surge. April delivered an even higher peak before a pronounced reset in May. The summer period looked steadier by comparison, stepping down from June to September before a late‑Q3/early‑Q4 trough in October. By contrast, the global Cost Per Purchase pattern showed mild seasonality and minimal whipsaws, typical of Facebook Ads benchmarks where competitive intensity rises and falls gradually across quarters.

Country vs. Global

Against the global average of about 49 across the same months, Denmark’s outlier peaks sat 22–34x above market in February and April. In more typical months, Denmark generally ran 1.4–4.3x above global levels (for example, May at 72 vs. 51, June at 208 vs. 48). The gap occasionally narrowed or flipped: Denmark trailed in November 2024 (−36% vs. global) and again in October 2025 (−74%), coinciding with its annual low. While the global trend rose modestly and stayed compact (42.7 to 53.8 range in the first half, drifting toward the mid‑40s by October), Denmark’s range stretched from 11.76 to 1,724 — a spread that makes the country one of the most volatile pockets of all‑industry ad performance in the period.

Closing

For performance marketers tracking Facebook Ads benchmarks, this view of Cost Per Purchase trends shows Denmark operating largely above the global baseline but with exceptional volatility, punctuated by two extreme spikes and a year-end low. Understanding Cost Per Purchase benchmarks for all industries in Denmark helps contextualize country-specific ad costs and compare industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Denmark, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Denmark Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Christmas & Boxing Day (late Dec), Easter holidays (groceries, travel, tourism), Mother's Day and Valentine's Day

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter period due to travel-related campaigns. Late December ad competition might intensify in retail and hospitality. Whit Weekend might reduce weekday competition. Strict retail closures on holidays could drop competition, but pre-holiday CPMs may escalate.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.