Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Design

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Design

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Design advertising across all countries spent 2025 riding higher and swinging wider than the market. Cost per purchase (CPP) opened unusually low in December at $82.90, then surged into a March–April crest near $490 before easing into Q4, landing at $176.77 in November. Against the global benchmark—steady around the low-$50s—the Design category ran hot throughout the year, averaging roughly 6x above market with materially sharper month-to-month moves. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Design in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across all countries, Design’s CPP averaged $306 from December to November, with a median near $285. The period’s low came at the very start ($82.90 in December), while the high arrived in March at $489.41, closely followed by April at $482.64. From December to January, CPP jumped by $193, then climbed another $216 by March. The ascent cooled through May ($434.19) and broke lower in June ($243.43), before a mid-year rebound to the mid-$300s in July–August and a step-down into Q4 ($223.90 in October; $176.77 in November).

Volatility was a defining feature: the average absolute month-to-month change was $85, about 28% of the mean—far choppier than the global benchmark’s $1.83 average move (just 4% of its mean). The span from the cycle low to the March peak was about 5.9x. From March’s high to November’s level, CPP fell 64%, yet still finished 113% above December’s starting point.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The first half of 2025 was the pricier phase for Design, averaging $380 per purchase (January–June), with a steep Q1 lift culminating in March–April’s peak. Q2 held elevated levels before capitulating in June. The back half (July–November) averaged $278—about 27% softer than H1—characterized by a brief July–August plateau in the mid-$300s, then a progressive Q4 easing toward sub-$200 territory by November. This rhythm aligns with broader platform patterns where performance often softens into late Q4 as competition reshapes auction dynamics, with earlier-year windows exhibiting more aggressive CPP swings.

Country vs. Global

Compared with Facebook Ads benchmarks across all industries globally, Design’s CPP stayed well above market throughout. The global average for December–November was $51.22 versus Design’s $306—nearly six times higher. The gap was narrowest in December (Design +61% vs. global), then widened materially: +420% in January, +400% in February, and roughly +820–830% at the March–April zenith. Even as Design cooled into Q4, the spread remained substantial: +339% in October and +289% in November. While the global trend drifted down modestly from H1 ($52.54) to H2-to-date ($49.57, −6%), Design’s path was more elevated and more volatile, descending from $380 in H1 to $278 in H2-to-date (−27%).

Closing

Taken together, these country-agnostic Facebook Ads benchmarks show Design’s cost per purchase running high and turbulent against a relatively stable global backdrop. Understanding cost-per-purchase benchmarks for the Design industry across all countries helps marketers evaluate country-specific ad costs, compare industry ad performance to global levels, and situate CPP within broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance context.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Design industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.