Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Design

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Design

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Design advertisers faced a year of elevated acquisition costs that swung sharply month to month, then eased dramatically into year-end. Across all countries, Cost per Purchase (CPP) for the Design industry averaged 211 in 2025—about four times the global median—and moved in a pronounced sawtooth pattern with three distinct spikes before a steep Q4 slide. Volatility was the defining feature, yet the year closed with the narrowest gap to the broader market.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Design in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Design CPP opened at 249 in January and finished at 88 in December, a 65% decline from start to finish. The year’s high came in July at 270, while the low landed in December at 88—an overall peak-to-trough drop of 67%. The monthly median averaged 210.6, but the path was choppy: notable surges to 268 in April, 270 in July, and 262 in September were followed by abrupt declines.

Volatility was elevated. Average absolute month-over-month movement was 48.6 points, with some of the sharpest swings around midyear: April to May (−78), July to August (−80), August to September (+73), and September to October (−72). The back half of the year trended lower overall: H1 averaged 234, while H2 averaged 187 (−20%).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The year organized into four distinct phases:

  • Q1 stayed elevated but receding: 242 average, slipping gradually from January’s 249 to March’s 233.
  • Q2 pivoted sharply: a spike to 268 in April was followed by a 29% drop to 190 in May, then a partial rebound to 223 in June.
  • Q3 was the most volatile stretch, bookended by July’s high of 270 and September’s 262, with a deep August trough at 189.
  • Q4 broke from typical holiday-season cost pressure seen in broader CPC trends and CPM analysis. Instead, Design CPP fell each month—190 in October to 122 in November and 88 in December—producing the lowest readings of the year.

Country vs. Global

Compared with the global Facebook Ads benchmarks across all industries, Design’s CPP sat consistently “above market.” The Design average (211) was roughly 4.1x the 2025 global median (51.7). Month by month, the premium ranged from 1.85x in December—the narrowest gap of the year—to 5.48x in July, the widest.

While the global benchmark drifted modestly lower across 2025 (−10% from January to December) with minimal volatility (average monthly change of 1.6 points), Design’s trend was both higher and far more turbulent. The gap to global levels narrowed sharply late in the year as Design CPP fell to 88 in December versus the global 47.6, reducing the premium to +85% after being +448% at the July peak.

Closing

Facebook Ads benchmarks underscore that Cost per Purchase for the Design industry across all countries remained well above global averages in 2025, with sharp midyear spikes and a pronounced Q4 comedown. Understanding cost-per-purchase trends for Design in all countries—and how they diverge from global patterns—helps contextualize performance against market-level acquisition costs.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Design industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.