See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Design advertisers in South Africa ran well below the global Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase throughout 2025. Costs lifted sharply in February, unwound into an April trough, stabilized mid‑year, and softened again into November — a tight absolute range, but pronounced percentage swings month to month. The standout moments were a February peak and a November low, with a steady gap versus the global market that rarely narrowed.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for the Design industry in South Africa compared to the global benchmark.
Cost per purchase for Design in South Africa averaged 1.57 across the observed period (January–November 2025), ranging from a high of 2.26 in February to a low of 0.75 in November. The year opened at 1.17 in January, surged to 2.26 in February (+94%), and then retraced to 0.82 by April (−64% from the February high). A mid‑year rebound followed: 1.81 in May, 1.60 in June, and 2.05 in July, before softening into the 0.75 November low.
Volatility averaged 0.78 points per interval, reflecting sharper percentage swings than the modest absolute values imply. The biggest moves were a two‑month drop from February to April (−1.44 points) and a late‑period slide from July to November (−1.30 points). Across the year, the range spanned 1.51 points, nearly the size of the average — a compact band in dollars but an active market in relative terms.
The pattern suggests an early‑Q1 lift culminating in February, a Q2 trough in April, and a steadier mid‑year plateau through July. Performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1; in this dataset, November marked the lowest month of the year for South Africa’s Design cost per purchase. The rhythm is consistent with broader advertising seasonality: early‑year recalibration, mid‑year stability, and year‑end pressure.
Against the global benchmark, South Africa’s Design cost per purchase remained far below market levels. Globally, cost per purchase averaged about 52.02 from January to November 2025, moving within a 47–55 band for most of the year, before a sharp reset to 25.15 in January 2026. South Africa averaged 1.57 over the same period — roughly 97% below the global average. The gap was narrowest in February (2.26 vs. 54.77, about 96% below) and widest in April and November (0.82–0.75 vs. 52.38–47.32, about 98% below).
Momentum also diverged. South Africa declined 36% from January to November, a steeper slide than the global −11% over the same window. In absolute terms, global volatility averaged about 1.6 points per month across 2025 (spiking into January 2026), while South Africa’s average move was roughly half that at 0.78 points — relatively calmer in dollars, though proportionally more dramatic.
Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for the Design industry in South Africa — and how they compare to global industry ad performance — helps contextualize country-specific ad costs alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance. This benchmark read shows a structurally lower South African cost base, a February high, and a November low, set against a globally elevated but easing 2025 backdrop.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Design industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting South Africa, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), December (Christmas & Day of Goodwill), Mid-year retail (June Youth Day promotions)
CPM and CPC might rise during long weekends like Human Rights Day, Freedom Day, and Heritage Day as leisure and travel-related media consumption increases. Retail CPMs may spike in late November–December for holiday shopping. Youth Day and National Women's Day might drive regional campaigns. Weekend extensions across public holidays may benefit weekend campaigns.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app