Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for E-commerce

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for E-commerce

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

E-commerce acquisition costs across all countries ran consistently below the global market in 2025, with one brief April flare-up before settling into a lower-cost groove through Q4. The year opened in the mid-$40s, climbed to a spring peak, then trended down to the low $40s with a modest November bump. Compared to the broader benchmark, E-commerce showed cheaper cost-per-purchase most months, slightly choppier month-to-month moves, and a smaller full-year decline.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for E-commerce across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to finish: E-commerce cost per purchase (CPP) moved from $44.90 in January to $41.85 in December, a 6.8% decline. The global benchmark fell more, down 15% over the same span (from $53.25 to $45.08).
  • Highs and lows: E-commerce peaked at $52.89 in April and bottomed at $41.28 in October, an $11.61 swing (about 26% of its annual average). The annual average CPP for E-commerce was roughly $45.4, versus $51.4 for the global all-industry benchmark.
  • Key movements: Early-year acceleration was clear—February jumped to $50.16 (+12% vs. January), and April set the high. From there, CPP eased nearly every month into October. November posted a brief rebound to $43.65 (+5.7% MoM) before December eased back to $41.85.
  • Volatility: Average absolute month-to-month change in E-commerce CPP was about $2.67, versus $1.77 for the global benchmark—roughly 50% more volatile.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm was “spring spike, late-summer slide, quiet Q4.” E-commerce CPP built steadily into April, then cooled through late summer and early fall—August to October marked the softest stretch, landing at the yearly low in October. Q4 carried the lowest quarterly prices for E-commerce, averaging $42.26 across October–December. The global series followed a different cadence: elevated levels in the first half, a brief late-summer lift, then a sharper step-down in November and December.

Seasonality in broader Facebook Ads benchmarks often reflects competition and conversion rates shifting through the year. In this dataset, E-commerce’s CPP softened as the year progressed, while the global market’s drop was concentrated late in the year, producing a clearer Q4 discount at the global level.

Country vs. Global

Across all countries, E-commerce stayed below market most months and briefly ran above market in April:

  • Annual gap: E-commerce averaged about 12% below the global benchmark ($45.4 vs. $51.4).
  • Narrowest gap: April ran slightly above global (+1%). Late year was also close, with December at about 7% below.
  • Widest gap: The spread was largest in early fall—September (−21%) and October (−22%) versus global.
  • Trend contrast: The global benchmark declined steadily (−15% Jan to Dec) with a sharp November drop, while E-commerce eased more gradually (−7%). E-commerce’s monthly path was choppier, though still trending lower from spring to autumn.

Closing

In summary, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for E-commerce across all countries show a spring peak, a prolonged decline into October, and a low-cost Q4 that remained below the all-industry global average. These CPP trends, read alongside CPM analysis and CTR performance, provide a clear, country-agnostic view of industry ad performance and country-specific ad costs within a global context. Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for E-commerce across all countries helps marketers evaluate acquisition costs against global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the E-commerce industry, Facebook ad costs can be varied, with peaks during holiday seasons and competitive product categories. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.