See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Energy and Mining purchase costs ran hot, then cooled dramatically. Across all countries, the industry’s median Cost Per Purchase (CPP) began high in late 2024, spiked to an extreme in January 2025, and then slid toward near-benchmark territory by early Q4 2025. Compared with the global benchmark, this category was consistently more expensive and far more volatile, with a few moments of near parity. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Energy and Mining across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Across the observed months, Energy and Mining’s CPP averaged about $191, ranging from a high of $504 in January 2025 to a low of $31 in October 2025. The period opened at $239 in November 2024 and closed at $31 in October 2025, an 87% decline from start to finish. The most pronounced swing came at the turn of the year: CPP climbed from $139 in December to $504 in January (+261%), then fell to $341 in February and collapsed to $49 in March (−85% versus February). After a spring gap, CPP rebounded to $245 in June (+393% from March), then eased through late summer and early fall—$94 in August, $73 in September, and the cycle low of $31 in October.
By comparison, the global benchmark (all industries across all countries) was steady, averaging roughly $49 across the year, with a narrow band from $42.6 to $53.8. Month-to-month swings in Energy and Mining averaged about $166 per move, versus just $3.3 for the overall market, underscoring far sharper volatility in industry ad performance.
Late 2024 (Nov–Dec) showed elevated CPPs for Energy and Mining—$239 in November and $139 in December—consistent with heavier Q4 competition. The New Year produced an outsized spike (January at $504), followed by a rapid normalization through March ($50). Mid-year activity lifted costs again—June reached $245—before settling into a softer late Q3/early Q4 pattern: $94 in August, $73 in September, and $31 in October. In effect, the category transitioned from premium purchase costs in Q4/Q1 to more accessible levels by early Q4 of the following year, a rhythm that aligns with broader auction pressure dynamics often seen in CPM analysis and CPC trends, even though the focus here is CPP.
Against the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, Energy and Mining was mostly above market. In November, CPP was 5.6x the benchmark; December was 2.8x. January marked the widest gap at 9.7x global levels. February held at 6.3x. March narrowed to near parity (−5% versus global), then June again widened to 5.1x. Late-year months moderated: August at 1.9x and September at 1.5x, with October 28% below the benchmark. On average across overlapping months, Energy and Mining’s CPP was about 3.9x the market—approximately 289% higher—yet with notable compression in the back half of the year. The global trend itself was steady (+1–2% from November 2024 to October 2025), while the industry series was choppier, moving from high-double- to low-triple-digit CPPs before landing near benchmark.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase in the Energy and Mining industry across all countries highlights a year of elevated, highly variable country-specific ad costs that ultimately converged toward the global average. This CPP analysis—set alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance context—helps quantify how Energy and Mining ad buying compared to the overall market worldwide.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app