Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Energy and Mining in Israel

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Energy and Mining in Israel

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Key takeaways

  • Scope: This analysis looks at cost-per-purchase trends for the Energy and Mining industry in Israel compared to the global trend; the analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.
  • Data availability: No monthly observations are available for the selected segment (Energy and Mining in Israel) in this period, so comparisons to the global baseline cannot be quantified.
  • Global baseline: Average cost-per-purchase was 47.73, with a median of 46.96, a high of 53.89 (February 2025), and a low of 32.29 (September 2025).
  • Trend and volatility: From the first to last month, the baseline fell 30.7% (46.60 to 32.29). The average month-to-month movement was about 3.0, with a sharp December jump and a pronounced drop in September 2025.
  • Seasonality: Costs typically lift in Q4 into Q1 (holiday and post-holiday periods), remain elevated through Q1, moderate across late spring and summer, and dipped sharply in September 2025.

Scope and data

This report summarizes Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for the Energy and Mining industry in Israel and compares them to the global trend. The selected dataset for Israel contains no values for the months in scope, so the review centers on the global baseline as directional context.

Selected segment results

  • No in-scope monthly data was available for Energy and Mining in Israel. As a result, averages, highs/lows, and volatility measures for the selected segment cannot be computed for this period.

Global baseline benchmarks

  • Average: 47.73
  • Median: 46.96
  • High: 53.89 in February 2025
  • Low: 32.29 in September 2025
  • First-to-last change: -30.7% (from 46.60 in September 2024 to 32.29 in September 2025)
  • Range (high–low): 21.60
  • Average month-to-month change (absolute): ~3.0

Notable moves:

  • November to December 2024: +8.34 (+19.3%), climbing from 43.19 to 51.53
  • August to September 2025: -13.40 (-29.3%), dropping from 45.69 to 32.29

Seasonality and volatility

  • Q4 pattern: Costs softened in November (43.19) before surging in December (51.53), reflecting typical holiday dynamics.
  • Q1 elevation: January through March remained high, averaging about 52.94, with the peak in February (53.89).
  • Midyear easing: April to August trended lower overall (generally 45–52), with a steady drift down through the summer.
  • Sharp late Q3 dip: September 2025 marked the lowest point (32.29), significantly below the annual median and average.

Comparative positioning

Because no monthly observations exist for Energy and Mining in Israel, we cannot determine whether the selected segment was above market, below average, or in line with overall trends during this period. The global baseline provides directional context on seasonality, typical ranges, and recent volatility in cost-per-purchase.

Understanding cost-per-purchase benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Energy and Mining and Israel helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Israel, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Israel Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Apr 13–19Passover
May 1Independence Day
Jun 2Shavuot
Sep 23–24Rosh Hashanah
Oct 2Yom Kippur
Oct 7–14Sukkot

Key Shopping Season

Passover (April), Sukkot and Fall holidays (Sept–Oct), Hanukkah (December)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during Passover as consumers prepare homes and plan meals. Fall holiday cluster may see media consumption fluctuate—consumers often offline during holidays, but prior week advertising demand may peak. Yom HaAtzmaut might spark tourism and leisure engagement. Hanukkah could drive e‑commerce CPMs for toys and electronics.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.