Compare ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type.
October 2025 - September 2026
Benchmark observations based on the selected data
Across the 13-month window, Entertainment cost-per-purchase (COST_PER_PURCHASE) ran consistently below the global benchmark but showed sharper swings and an extreme end-of-series anomaly. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Entertainment in All countries compared to the global benchmark.
Entertainment’s median cost-per-purchase began at about $28.87 in July 2025 and finished at $1.26 in July 2026 — a dramatic decline of roughly 96% driven largely by the final-month outlier. Over the full period the Entertainment median was about $31.80, with a high of roughly $50.73 (June 2026) and a low of $1.26 (July 2026). By contrast the global baseline averaged about $47.55, peaking near $56.00 in March 2026 and bottoming at about $19.69 in July 2026. On average Entertainment costs were roughly 33% lower than the global benchmark across these months.
Key monthly moves read like a sequence of lifts and pulls: an initial lift into August and November 2025 (to ~$37 and ~$40), a softening into February 2026 (~$23), a rebound into spring, and a pronounced spike in June 2026 to ~$50.7 before the abrupt collapse to $1.26 in July 2026. The June 2026 increase stands out because it pushed Entertainment above the global CPM/CPL-level baseline (+18% versus the baseline in June), an otherwise rare month where Entertainment ran above market.
Volatility was material. Entertainment’s average absolute month-to-month change was about $9.4, compared with roughly $4.8 for the global series — roughly double the month-to-month movement of the baseline and highlighting a choppier pattern in industry ad performance.
Rhythm across the year loosely follows familiar pulses: late-summer and late-autumn lifts (August and November), a quieter winter into early Q1, and a spring rebound. November 2025 trimmed the gap to the global baseline (Entertainment was only ~13% below the benchmark that month), while February 2026 showed one of the widest consistent gaps (~54% below global). March 2026’s global peak (~$56) contrasts with the Entertainment troughs around late Q4/early Q1. June 2026 represents a seasonal aberration for Entertainment with a sharp upward move; July 2026’s collapse reads as a singular, outsized anomaly against the prior seasonal pattern.
Viewed as “All countries,” Entertainment overall ran below market for most of the year — commonly 25–45% under the global cost-per-purchase level — with two notable exceptions: June 2026 (Entertainment +18% above the global median) and the final-month disruption in July 2026 (Entertainment −94% vs baseline, an extreme outlier). The selected Entertainment series was more volatile than the baseline (range ≈ $49.5 vs ≈ $36.3), and its month-to-month swings averaged nearly twice the baseline’s, signaling a more uneven trajectory in industry ad performance when aggregated across all countries.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends and CPM analysis alongside Cost per Purchase and CTR performance helps frame these country-specific ad costs and the broader industry ad performance patterns. In sum: the Cost per Purchase trajectory for Entertainment across All countries shows lower average cost than the global benchmark but with higher volatility and a set of pronounced monthly lifts, dips, and a notable end-period anomaly.
Facebook advertising cost benchmarks
Facebook advertising costs vary by industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objective. In the Entertainment industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs through regional competition and user engagement. Campaign objectives affect costs because Facebook optimizes delivery for different goals. The data shows median values across multiple campaigns. Results can vary with ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
A small share of campaigns has extremely high CPP values. Those outliers can inflate an average. The median is the midpoint across campaigns, so it better represents a typical result.
The data shows industry median benchmarks. Costs can vary with targeting, creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Analyze Facebook ad performance
See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
Spot creative patterns that affect ROAS.
Create reports without spreadsheets.
The dataset includes over $3B in Facebook ad spend from thousands of ad accounts that use Superads to analyze and improve campaigns. Every data point is anonymized and aggregated. It does not expose an individual advertiser.
The dataset updates as new ad data is available.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. A higher CPA can work when the margin supports it. Measure CPA with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help advertisers stay within a target CPA. It suits experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It provides more control and requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Compare cost benchmarks for Facebook advertising metrics.
Cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across markets
Click-through rate benchmarks for Facebook Ads
Cost per lead benchmarks across markets
Cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
App install cost benchmarks