See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
August 2025 - August 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Across the 13-month window, Entertainment cost-per-purchase (COST_PER_PURCHASE) ran consistently below the global benchmark but showed sharper swings and an extreme end-of-series anomaly. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Entertainment in All countries compared to the global benchmark.
Entertainment’s median cost-per-purchase began at about $28.87 in July 2025 and finished at $1.26 in July 2026 — a dramatic decline of roughly 96% driven largely by the final-month outlier. Over the full period the Entertainment median was about $31.80, with a high of roughly $50.73 (June 2026) and a low of $1.26 (July 2026). By contrast the global baseline averaged about $47.55, peaking near $56.00 in March 2026 and bottoming at about $19.69 in July 2026. On average Entertainment costs were roughly 33% lower than the global benchmark across these months.
Key monthly moves read like a sequence of lifts and pulls: an initial lift into August and November 2025 (to ~$37 and ~$40), a softening into February 2026 (~$23), a rebound into spring, and a pronounced spike in June 2026 to ~$50.7 before the abrupt collapse to $1.26 in July 2026. The June 2026 increase stands out because it pushed Entertainment above the global CPM/CPL-level baseline (+18% versus the baseline in June), an otherwise rare month where Entertainment ran above market.
Volatility was material. Entertainment’s average absolute month-to-month change was about $9.4, compared with roughly $4.8 for the global series — roughly double the month-to-month movement of the baseline and highlighting a choppier pattern in industry ad performance.
Rhythm across the year loosely follows familiar pulses: late-summer and late-autumn lifts (August and November), a quieter winter into early Q1, and a spring rebound. November 2025 trimmed the gap to the global baseline (Entertainment was only ~13% below the benchmark that month), while February 2026 showed one of the widest consistent gaps (~54% below global). March 2026’s global peak (~$56) contrasts with the Entertainment troughs around late Q4/early Q1. June 2026 represents a seasonal aberration for Entertainment with a sharp upward move; July 2026’s collapse reads as a singular, outsized anomaly against the prior seasonal pattern.
Viewed as “All countries,” Entertainment overall ran below market for most of the year — commonly 25–45% under the global cost-per-purchase level — with two notable exceptions: June 2026 (Entertainment +18% above the global median) and the final-month disruption in July 2026 (Entertainment −94% vs baseline, an extreme outlier). The selected Entertainment series was more volatile than the baseline (range ≈ $49.5 vs ≈ $36.3), and its month-to-month swings averaged nearly twice the baseline’s, signaling a more uneven trajectory in industry ad performance when aggregated across all countries.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends and CPM analysis alongside Cost per Purchase and CTR performance helps frame these country-specific ad costs and the broader industry ad performance patterns. In sum: the Cost per Purchase trajectory for Entertainment across All countries shows lower average cost than the global benchmark but with higher volatility and a set of pronounced monthly lifts, dips, and a notable end-period anomaly.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Entertainment industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app