Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Fitness & Training Centers

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Fitness & Training Centers

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Fitness & Training Centers saw cost per purchase (CPP) climb sharply across all countries, running well above the global, all‑industry benchmark throughout the year. The story is one of a steady late‑Q4 baseline, a New Year surge, and a pronounced summer peak before easing into October—paired with higher volatility than the market average. July stands out as the most expensive month, while November marked the most efficient entry point in this period.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Fitness & Training Centers in all countries available compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across all countries, Fitness & Training Centers’ median CPP averaged $142, ranging from a low of $95 in November 2024 to a high of $183 in July 2025—a span of $88 (about 62% of the average). The period opened at $95 in November, lifted to $103 in December, then jumped 48% month over month into January ($152). After a brief dip into March–April ($126–$124), CPP climbed again, pushing through June ($146) to a summer peak in July ($183). Costs remained elevated through August–September ($171–$175) before retreating to $141 in October. From start to finish, CPP rose 48%.

Volatility was notable: average absolute month‑to‑month movement was $17.6, or 13%—considerably choppier than the market baseline. The sharpest month‑over‑month lift came in January (+48%), while the steepest pullback occurred in October (−19% vs. September).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the category’s CPP softened in late Q4 (Nov–Dec average near $99), then surged with New Year demand, averaging $143 across Q1 (Jan–Mar). Q2 moderated to $134, reflecting a mid‑spring cooldown, before Q3 re‑accelerated to the period’s highest quarterly average at $176 as summer acquisition costs peaked. By October, CPP eased back to $141, signaling a comedown from summer intensity even as the broader market typically tightens into late Q4.

Country vs. Global

Compared to the global, all‑industry benchmark, Fitness & Training Centers operated at a significantly higher cost level across the board. The global median CPP averaged $49 over the same months—about 187% lower than the category’s $142 average. The market trend line was also calmer: the baseline’s average monthly move was just $2.6 (about 5.4%), versus $17.6 (13%) for Fitness & Training Centers.

The gap persisted every month. At its narrowest in December, the category’s CPP was still 106% above the global level ($103 vs. $50). At its widest in July, the industry cleared the market by 288% ($183 vs. $47). While the global benchmark stayed nearly flat from November to October (+2%), Fitness & Training Centers rose 48%, with the most pronounced divergence unfolding from late spring into summer.

Closing

Overall, Facebook Ads benchmarks show that cost per purchase for Fitness & Training Centers across all countries remains elevated, seasonally sensitive, and more volatile than the global all‑industry norm. Understanding CPP trends within industry ad performance—alongside CPM analysis and CTR performance context—helps frame country‑agnostic ad costs and the broader shape of CPC trends for Fitness & Training Centers worldwide.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Fitness & Training Centers industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.