Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Fitness & Training Centers

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Fitness & Training Centers

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Fitness & Training Centers ran materially “above market” on Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per Purchase throughout 2025, with a pronounced mid-year surge and a softer Q4 landing. The category’s CPP averaged 143, peaking in July near 177 before easing to a yearly low around 116 in November and rebounding in December to 128. Compared to the broader, all‑industry global benchmark, Fitness & Training Centers were consistently more expensive to convert and markedly more volatile month to month.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Fitness & Training Centers in All countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The year opened elevated at 153 in January and closed at 128 in December, a 16% decline across the year. CPP averaged 143, with the high in July (177) and the low in November (116). The path to that peak was stepwise: after easing through April (123), costs lifted into June (145) and surged in July (+32 month over month), then stayed elevated through early fall (167 in August, 163 in September). The category then cooled sharply in October (141) and November (116) before a December rebound (+10% vs. November).

Day-to-day marketers felt that pace as volatility: average absolute month-over-month movement was about 14 points, with the largest swings in July (+32) and November (−25). By comparison, the global all‑industry benchmark moved by only about 1.6 points on average—far steadier.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Fitness & Training Centers showed a classic mid-year build and late-year reset:

  • Q1 (Jan–Mar) averaged 143, carried by elevated January and February levels before March cooled.
  • Q2 (Apr–Jun) dipped to 133 on the back of April’s low, then climbed into June.
  • Q3 (Jul–Sep) was the high-water mark at 169, driven by July’s spike and sustained summer intensity.
  • Q4 (Oct–Dec) compressed to 128, as costs fell through November before a December uptick.

While many markets see competition rise in Q4, this vertical’s CPP softened into November before tightening again in December, suggesting end‑of‑year conversion economics were temporarily more favorable.

Country vs. Global

Against the global all‑industry baseline, Fitness & Training Centers remained substantially higher all year. The category’s 2025 average CPP (143) was nearly 3x the global benchmark (52). The monthly premium never fell below 2.36x (April, +136% vs. global) and reached 3.60x at the July peak (+260%). The global trend itself was stable-to-down, sliding from 53 in January to 48 in December (−10%), with minimal volatility and a narrow range between its high (55 in February) and low (47 in November). In contrast, Fitness & Training Centers traveled a broader arc—rising into mid-year and retracing into Q4—ultimately ending below January yet still far above the market.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per Purchase in Fitness & Training Centers across all countries highlights a high-cost, high-volatility year: a mid‑year surge, a Q4 cooldown, and a persistent premium over the global all‑industry baseline. While this report centers on CPP, many teams read these results alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance to contextualize funnel efficiency. These cost-per-purchase benchmarks for Fitness & Training Centers in All countries provide a clear basis for comparing industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Fitness & Training Centers industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.