Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Gaming

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Gaming

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Globally, Gaming’s cost per purchase moved through two distinct acts: an extended stretch of bargain-level costs through mid‑year, then a sharp upswing into Q4 that broke from the broader market. For most months, Gaming cleared purchases at materially lower costs than the global benchmark, before flipping dramatically higher in November. Volatility was the other headline—bigger swings, faster turns, and a much wider range than the market overall.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for the Gaming industry across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Gaming CPP opened at 20.74 in November 2024 and closed at 83.88 in November 2025—roughly a 4x rise across the period. The year’s low arrived in July (10.45), and the high landed in November (83.88), creating a 73-point range. The median monthly level averaged 34.6.

The path between those endpoints was choppy. After a soft Q4–Q1 (Nov–Jan: 20.74 → 18.81), February nearly doubled January (+99%), only to fall back in March (−29%) and rebound in April (+45%). A mid‑year slide culminated in July’s trough (−58% from June), followed by a whiplash jump in August to 49.39—up 373% month over month—and a near‑flat September (−0.7%). October pulled back to 39.94 (−18.6%), then November spiked 110% to the annual peak.

Volatility averaged 14.0 points in absolute month‑to‑month moves—roughly four times the global benchmark’s 3.5—underscoring how turbulent Gaming’s acquisition costs were across all countries.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The first half of the period reads as a low-cost phase, with CPP subdued from November through June and bottoming in July. Late Q3 was a pronounced high-cost pocket (August–September near 49), moderating into October before an atypical November surge. In contrast with common year‑end dynamics where competition intensifies and performance can bifurcate, Gaming’s CPP peaked in November, while the broader market softened.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, Gaming’s CPP averaged 28% below market (34.6 vs. 48.1). It stayed below the benchmark in 12 of 13 months, reached near parity in August–September (2% and 1% below), and then inverted in November—83.88 vs. 30.61, or 174% above the market. The gap was widest in July (Gaming 78% below) and narrowest in September (1% below).

Trend lines diverged as well: the global benchmark eased from 42.73 in November 2024 to 30.61 by November 2025 (−28%), while Gaming rose from 20.74 to 83.88 (+304%). The benchmark’s range was tighter (about 23 points, high in February at 53.81 and low in November at 30.61), reflecting a steadier market backdrop compared to Gaming’s amplified swings.

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads cost‑per‑purchase benchmarks for the Gaming industry across all countries show a low-cost first half, a volatile late‑summer lift, and a decisive year‑end spike that diverged from global patterns. These CPP trends offer a clear view of country‑agnostic, industry ad performance and how Gaming’s country‑specific ad costs stack up against the worldwide benchmark.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Gaming industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.