Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Germany

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Germany

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

All industries in Germany operated at a consistently higher cost per purchase than the global benchmark in 2025, with sharper swings month to month. The year opened at mid-60s levels, spiked dramatically in February, then cooled into a summer trough before lifting in October and easing into year-end—ultimately finishing close to where it started. Compared with the steadier global track, Germany’s pattern was more episodic: punctuated by a February surge and an August low, with Q4 partially rebounding.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Germany compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

For Germany, median cost per purchase (CPP) averaged 73.3 across the year, ranging from a high of 100.1 in February to a low of 55.2 in August. The year began at 63.9 in January and ended at 65.3 in December, a near-flat +2% finish despite substantial intra-year movement.

Key inflection points:

  • February spike: 100.1 (+57% vs January), the year’s top reading.
  • Spring plateau: April–June held in a tight, elevated band (82.8–85.1).
  • Summer softness: July fell to 60.0 and August bottomed at 55.2, the annual low.
  • Q4 lift: October rose to 77.8 before easing to 75.6 in November and 65.3 in December.

The average absolute month-to-month swing in Germany was about 14 points, far choppier than the global series (~1.8 points). Six months sat above the German annual average (notably February and April–June, plus October–November), and six below (January, March, July–September, December).

Globally, CPP averaged 51.4, peaking at 54.8 in February and trending down toward 45.1 by December. From January to December, the global median declined roughly 15%, a smoother descent compared to Germany’s zigzagging path.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm in Germany tracked familiar auction seasonality, but with outsized amplitude:

  • Q1 was lumpy: a mid-quarter surge (February) bookended by mid-60s readings.
  • Q2 was the year’s costliest stretch (quarterly average 84.0), steady and elevated.
  • Q3 was the softest (59.6 on average), culminating in the August low.
  • Q4 partially rebounded (72.9 average), with an October lift followed by a gradual cool-down into December.

Globally, seasonality was more linear: modest levels in Q1 eased through Q2–Q3, then dipped further in Q4 to the year’s lowest quarterly average (48.3).

Country vs. Global

Germany’s CPP sat above market every month, by an average margin of about 43%. The gap was narrowest in August (+4% vs global) and widest in February (+83%). Through spring (April–June), Germany held 61–63% above the global benchmark; in Q3, the gap narrowed (about +15% on average) as German costs softened while global levels stayed relatively steady. The global trend was a steady decline (−15% Jan→Dec), whereas Germany’s net change was small (+2%) but far more volatile.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Germany highlights a market with elevated, more volatile country-specific ad costs versus the global baseline. This CPP view complements broader Facebook Ads benchmarks across CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, helping teams contextualize industry ad performance in Germany against global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Germany, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Germany Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 9Whit Monday
Oct 3German Unity Day
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Christmas shopping (late December), Back-to-school (August/September), Spring promotions (Easter period)

Potential Advertising Impact

Media consumption might rise during Easter, Ascension Day, and Pentecost, especially for travel campaigns. Late November and December bring pronounced spikes in retail advertising. German Unity Day often triggers localized campaigns. Regional holidays may create unique local competition. Sunday/holiday retail restrictions may contract ad inventory.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.