See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Healthcare stood out as a high-cost conversion category across Facebook Ads benchmarks. Median cost per purchase across all countries averaged $111.83 for Healthcare over the period, more than double the global all-industry benchmark at $49.61. The year carried a clear midyear trough, a sharp late-summer rebound, and a firm finish, with notable volatility compared to the steadier global curve. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Healthcare across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Healthcare started 2025 elevated at $129.57, peaked early at $138.29 in February, then retreated into a Q2 low of $91.28 in June before touching the year’s floor at $84.83 in July. A dramatic rebound followed: August surged to $129.27 (+52% month over month), before costs settled into a tighter $101–$107 band from September through December. The series closed with another climb to $133.78 in January 2026, near the annual highs.
Across the 13 months, Healthcare’s median cost per purchase ranged from $84.83 (July) to $138.29 (February), averaging $111.83. Month-to-month absolute moves averaged 16%, indicating a choppier pattern than the broader market. Only five of the 13 months sat above the full-period average (January–March, August, and January 2026), underscoring a year defined by an early spike, a midyear reset, and a late-stage firming.
The rhythm was recognizable: elevated Q1 acquisition costs (Jan–Mar averaged about $131), a softer Q2 trough (~$98), and a Q3 rebound (~$107) driven by the August spike. Q4 held steady around $104–$106, landing slightly below the annual average despite typical late-year competition. The new year opened strong again, with January 2026 jumping to $133.78. In many markets, performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1; Healthcare’s cost-per-purchase pattern across all countries broadly reflected that cadence, punctuated by a pronounced July–August swing.
While CPC trends and CPM analysis often mirror auction pressure, the conversion-level picture here shows Healthcare’s cost per purchase responding more abruptly midyear before stabilizing into the holidays.
Relative to the global benchmark, Healthcare remained consistently above market. The global all-industry median hovered near $50 for most of 2025, drifting gently from $53 in January to $48 in December before stepping down sharply to $25 in January 2026. Against that backdrop, Healthcare’s cost per purchase ran 72%–152% above global levels for most months (narrowest gap in July at +72%; widest typical gap in February at +152%). The spread widened dramatically in January 2026 (+432%) as the global benchmark fell while Healthcare rose.
Volatility differed as well: Healthcare’s average absolute monthly move was about 16%, versus 6.7% for the global benchmark (the latter shaped by a calm 2025 and a single large drop in January 2026).
In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase in Healthcare across all countries show a high-cost category with pronounced midyear softness, an August snapback, and a firm start to 2026—consistently above the global benchmark. Understanding cost-per-purchase dynamics for Healthcare across all countries helps clarify industry ad performance, complementing CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance when comparing country-specific ad costs to global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Healthcare industry, Facebook ad costs can be higher than average due to specialized audience targeting and compliance requirements. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app