Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for HR & Staffing

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for HR & Staffing

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

HR & Staffing showed a dramatic two‑month pivot in Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase across all countries: a high-cost April gave way to a sharply lower May, swinging from well above market to materially below it. Against the steadier global benchmark, this category’s early Q2 pattern stands out for its amplitude more than its direction. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

For HR & Staffing across all countries, median Cost Per Purchase landed at 78.29 in April 2025, then fell to 27.91 in May 2025. That is a 64% month‑over‑month decline, a 50.38‑point move in absolute terms. The two‑month average was 53.10.

Context from the global benchmark shows a calmer backdrop. Globally, Cost Per Purchase averaged about 48.06 from November 2024 through November 2025, ranging from a high of 53.81 in February 2025 to a low of 30.61 in November 2025. Month‑to‑month volatility in the global series averaged roughly 3.45 points, with the largest single shift being a 14.90‑point drop heading into November.

Put side by side, HR & Staffing’s April–May swing (50.38 points) exceeded the entire 13‑month global high‑to‑low range (about 23.2 points), highlighting how suddenly acquisition costs moved for this category across all countries.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The global pattern rose through late Q4 into a February peak, then eased modestly through mid‑year, ticked up in August, and softened again into October before a sharp November compression. By contrast, HR & Staffing condensed a full cycle into two months: an elevated April followed by a May trough. In April, HR & Staffing’s Cost Per Purchase sat notably above typical global Q2 levels, while May resembled the softer pockets seen in the global series’ weakest months.

Even within this brief window, the rhythm is clear: April represented the costliest point for the category in early Q2, and May marked the lowest, pulling the two‑month average only slightly above the global April–May baseline.

Country vs. Global

  • April 2025: HR & Staffing’s Cost Per Purchase (78.29) was 52% above the global benchmark (51.39).
  • May 2025: HR & Staffing (27.91) was 45% below the global benchmark (51.18).
  • Across April–May, HR & Staffing averaged 53.10, about 3.5% above the global April–May average (51.29) and roughly 10% higher than the full 13‑month global average (48.06).

In relative terms, the gap flipped from “above market” in April to “below average” in May, making the category more volatile than the global benchmark over the same period. While the global trend moved gradually (+26% from November 2024 to a February 2025 peak, then −15% by October, and −28% by November), HR & Staffing’s two‑month view was choppier, with a single step down of −64%.

Closing

For performance marketers tracking Facebook Ads benchmarks, HR & Staffing across all countries posted a pronounced early‑Q2 swing in Cost Per Purchase—moving from 52% above the global benchmark in April to 45% below it in May. Understanding Cost Per Purchase benchmarks for HR & Staffing across all countries helps ground country‑specific ad costs and industry ad performance against global patterns, alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.