Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for HR & Staffing

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for HR & Staffing

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Cost per Purchase (CPP) for HR & Staffing across all available countries moved through a brief but dramatic swing this spring: a costly April followed by a sharp May reset. In April 2025, CPP reached $78.29—well above the market—before falling to $27.91 in May, a 64% month-over-month decline. Against the global benchmark, HR & Staffing flipped from a clear premium to a meaningful discount in just one month. Volatility was the headline: the two-point snapshot averaged $53.10, slightly above the market, but the path was defined by extremes.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing across all available countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting at $78.29 in April and ending at $27.91 in May, HR & Staffing CPP fell by $50.38 (−64%).
  • The two-month average landed at $53.10, with a high of $78.29 (April) and a low of $27.91 (May).
  • Versus the global benchmark, April’s CPP was 52% above market ($51.61 global), while May’s CPP was 46% below market ($51.27 global). The relative gap swung nearly 98 percentage points from premium to discount.
  • The amplitude of this move was unusual: the single-month swing of $50.38 dwarfed typical global month-to-month changes (the global series averages roughly a $2.6 shift per month and moved just $0.34 from April to May).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Looking at the global CPP rhythm provides useful context for seasonality. The market climbed into late Q1, peaking at $53.84 in February 2025, then eased through mid-year and compressed into early Q4: October marked one of the lowest points at $43.33, with November of the prior year also low at $42.61. December rebounded to $50.04, consistent with holiday-period shifts. Through Q2 (April–May), the global benchmark was steady around the low-$51s, showing mild softness but not large dislocations.

HR & Staffing’s April–May pattern diverged from that global steadiness. April presented an outsized cost profile, followed by a May normalization well below the market. That Q2 whipsaw sits in contrast to the broader market’s modest glide path during the same period.

Country vs. Global

  • Across April–May, HR & Staffing averaged $53.10 vs. a $51.44 global benchmark for the same months—about 3% higher on average.
  • Month-by-month, the category oscillated sharply relative to the market: +52% vs. global in April, then −46% in May. The narrowest gap occurred in May (−46%), the widest in April (+52%).
  • Trend shape differed significantly: the global benchmark was essentially flat in April–May (−0.7%, −$0.34), while HR & Staffing declined 64% (−$50.38).
  • Over the broader period, the global CPP averaged about $49.33 from November 2024 to October 2025, peaking in February and touching lows in October–November—suggesting a predictable contour that HR & Staffing briefly defied in Q2.

Closing

Within Facebook Ads benchmarks, this snapshot shows how cost per purchase for the HR & Staffing industry across all available countries briefly spiked above the market before dropping well below it, against a globally steady Q2 backdrop. While centered on CPP, the pattern complements broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance conversations by highlighting category-specific, country-aggregate ad costs. Understanding Facebook Ads cost per purchase benchmarks for HR & Staffing across all available countries helps marketers compare industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.