Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Italy

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Italy

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Italy’s cost per purchase (CPP) told a year of extremes: a sharp spring spike, a deep autumn trough, and a late-year return to baseline. Across all industries, Italy averaged a CPP of about 48.5, sitting below the global benchmark at 51.4 (around 6% cheaper overall) but moving with far more intensity. The standout month was April, when CPP jumped to 85.6—well above market—before plunging into an October low of 23.4. Momentum flipped multiple times through the year, with pronounced swings in Q2 and a notably soft Q3–Q4.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Italy compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Italy opened the year at 47.7 in January and closed at 48.5 in December—virtually flat (+1.6%) end to end. The path in between was anything but. CPP surged from March (59.9) to April (85.6), a +43% month-over-month lift, then halved in May (45.8, −46% from April). Midyear, CPP fell to 26.8 in July, rebounded to 56.0 in August (+109% MoM), dipped again in September (30.8), and bottomed in October at 23.4 before recovering into November (41.5) and December (48.5).

For the year, Italy’s CPP ranged from 23.4 to 85.6—a 62-point spread. The median sat close to the mean at roughly 48.1, underscoring a “typical” price point around the high 40s despite the dramatic swings. Volatility was pronounced: average month-to-month movement came in near 18.6 points. By contrast, the global CPP moved a modest 1.8 points on average per month.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm was two-speed. The first half ran elevated: Q1 averaged roughly 56.6 and Q2 peaked at 61.8, driven by April’s outsized surge. The second half was markedly softer: Q3 averaged about 37.9 and Q4 settled near 37.8 despite a late-year rebound. The low point in October stood out as the year’s trough before conditions normalized into the holiday period.

Globally, the pattern was smoother and gently downward. The global CPP eased from mid‑50s in Q1 (about 53.7) to the high 40s in Q4 (around 48.3), with December the annual low at 45.1. This aligns with typical year-end dynamics when purchase rates often rise during promotions, pulling cost per purchase down even as auction pressure can climb.

Country vs. Global

On average, Italy ran below market (48.5 vs. 51.4), but the relationship flip‑flopped month to month. Italy came in above the global benchmark six times (notably February, March, April, June, August, and December) and below it six times. The gap swung widely: Italy was most above market in April (+64% vs. global) and most below in October (−56%). At its narrowest, the spread was modest—June (+6%), August (+6%), and December (+7%). While the global line declined steadily about 15% from January to December, Italy’s path was choppier, with peak-to-trough moves over 70% and a nearly flat full‑year net.

In short, Italy’s all‑industry CPP in 2025 was cheaper than the global benchmark on average, more volatile by an order of magnitude, and defined by an exceptional April spike followed by a prolonged, softer second half.

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase in all industries in Italy—alongside global CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps clarify country-specific ad costs and benchmark industry ad performance against the worldwide pattern.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Italy, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Italy Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
Apr 25Liberation Day
May 1Labour Day
Jun 2Republic Day
Aug 15Ferragosto
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26St. Stephen's Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Christmas & post‑Christmas sales (late December), Ferragosto (mid‑August) summer tourism, Back‑to‑school (September)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might increase during spring holidays when Italians engage in travel or leisure. Ferragosto may see travel and hospitality ads face high competition while retail CPMs dip. Late November and December see ad demand surges. 'Ponte' long weekends could affect ad pacing with stronger performance on adjacent weekdays.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.