See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Globally, Manufacturing’s Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase (CPP) ran consistently above the market in 2025 and moved with far sharper swings. While the all‑industry global benchmark eased lower through the year, Manufacturing showed a choppy path with two pronounced surges—mid‑year and at year‑end—and a sharp November trough before a December spike. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Manufacturing across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Manufacturing’s CPP averaged $76.56, starting at $80.88 in January and finishing at $105.86 in December—up 31% from the start. The year’s low landed in November at $54.50, while December set the high at $105.86, creating a $51.36 span across the year. Key moves punctuated the rhythm: a +23% jump from May to June ($73.74 to $90.33), a −21% pullback in July ($71.04), midsummer softness into August ($63.57), and a +31% rebound in September ($83.16). Q4 amplified the volatility—October dipped to $73.34, November fell a further −26% month over month to $54.50, then December surged +94% to the year’s peak.
By contrast, the global all‑industry benchmark averaged $51.40, trending from $53.25 in January to $45.08 in December (−15%). The baseline’s range was narrower—$45.08 to $54.80 (a $9.72 span)—with only modest bumps in late summer.
Volatility highlights the difference: Manufacturing’s average month‑to‑month absolute move was $15.17, versus just $1.77 for the global benchmark—about 8.6x more volatile.
Quarterly pacing for Manufacturing showed Q2 as the richest quarter at an average $81.13, Q3 as the softest at $72.59, and Q4 rebounding to $77.90 but with extreme dispersion inside the quarter (October–December swing from $73.34 to $105.86). The pattern featured midsummer softness (July–August) and a pronounced year‑end spike after a November trough.
For the global baseline, performance typically softened through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1. In the data here, the market eased progressively across the calendar, with Q4 the lowest quarter at $48.30 and only a brief late‑summer lift (August–September).
Across all countries, Manufacturing’s CPP stayed above market every month. The average premium was $25.16 per purchase (+49%) relative to the global all‑industry benchmark. The gap narrowed most in November, when Manufacturing was 16% above market, and August was also relatively close (+20%). At its widest in December, Manufacturing CPP ran roughly 135% above the benchmark (2.35x). While the market declined −15% from January to December, Manufacturing climbed +31%, indicating a rising, more volatile cost curve relative to the steadier global trend.
Taken together, these Facebook Ads benchmarks show a global Manufacturing CPP that is higher and more variable than the market, with mid‑year lift, a sharp November dip, and a decisive December spike. While CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance often frame campaign efficiency, this view of purchase acquisition costs clarifies industry ad performance and country‑specific ad costs in aggregate. Understanding Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase benchmarks for the Manufacturing industry across all countries helps advertisers evaluate purchase efficiency against global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Manufacturing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app