Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Marketing & Advertising

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Marketing & Advertising

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Marketing & Advertising purchase costs moved through a full boom‑to‑bust cycle across all countries, landing well below the global benchmark on average but with far sharper swings month to month. Median Cost Per Purchase (CPP) for the industry averaged $44.94 from November 2024 to October 2025 versus the global all‑industry average of $49.33 — about 9% cheaper overall. The year opened expensive, cooled rapidly into spring, spiked mid‑year, then faded through late Q3 before touching an extreme low in October. Volatility was the standout theme: the industry’s CPP ranged from $80.33 (November) to just $4.20 (October), a $76 spread, while the global benchmark ranged a much narrower $11.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Marketing & Advertising across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The period started high and ended at a trough. CPP opened at $80.33 in November 2024 and closed at $4.20 in October 2025, a 95% decline over twelve months. The industry’s median CPP averaged $44.94, with notable highs at $71.06 in January and $64.86–$62.87 in May–June. Lows clustered in March–April ($28.39 and $25.14) and September ($27.07) before the October break to $4.20.

Momentum was choppy:

  • November to December fell 27%, then January rebounded 21%.
  • February plunged 48%, followed by a March–April glide lower (−24%, −12%).
  • A sharp May surge (+158% vs. April) carried into June, then July pulled back 43%.
  • August steadied (+22%), September slipped 38%, and October dropped 85% month over month.

Across the period, the average absolute monthly move was roughly $17.8, signaling far greater variability than typical Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality was visible but uneven. Q4 2024 was elevated (Nov–Dec averaging ~$69.65), aligning with year‑end competition. Q1 2025 represented a reset: CPP averaged ~$45.56 across January–March, stepping down each month after the January peak. Q2 was mixed — a low in April, then a pronounced late‑spring lift in May–June (~$51 on average). Q3 softened again (July–September averaging ~$35.40), consistent with mid‑year demand shifts. October 2025, often a ramp into Q4, printed the cycle’s lowest value, underscoring how industry‑specific dynamics can override typical Q4 inflation.

Country vs. Global

Compared with the global benchmark, the industry ran hotter early and cooler later:

  • Above market: November (+89%), December (+18%), January (+36%), May (+27%), June (+31%).
  • Below market: seven other months, most sharply in October (−90%).
  • On average, Marketing & Advertising CPP was ~9% under the all‑industry global level.

Trendlines diverged. The global benchmark was stable (+1.7% from November to October), with an average monthly shift of just ~$2.6. The Marketing & Advertising series was notably more volatile, with ~$17.8 average monthly swings and a −94.8% end‑to‑end slide. The gap between industry and global narrowed and widened repeatedly: from 89% above market in November to 90% below in October, with Q3 running roughly 28% under the benchmark.

Closing

Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Purchase show that Marketing & Advertising across all countries was, on average, cheaper than the global norm but substantially more volatile, oscillating between early‑season highs and a late‑year trough. Understanding cost‑per‑purchase trends — alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance — helps contextualize industry ad performance and country‑specific ad costs relative to global patterns for the Marketing & Advertising sector.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketing & Advertising industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.