See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Marketing & Advertising saw a cost-per-purchase story that moved in two gears: a whiplash first half and a cliff-like reset through Q4. Across all countries, median CPP opened high in January 2025, surged again in late spring, then accelerated downward into year-end and continued to fall in January 2026. Compared with the steadier global benchmark, the industry’s pattern was both lower on average and significantly more volatile, swinging from brief “above market” spikes to deep discounts versus the cross-industry norm.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Marketing & Advertising across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The year began expensive: CPP was $64.86 in January 2025, about 22% above the global benchmark ($53.15). It then slid to $26.35 by April before rebounding sharply—May and June landed at $59.60 and $60.25 respectively, a +129% lift from April. After that crest, the downtrend took hold: July–September ranged $30–$39, October dropped to $19.64, November to $12.10, and December closed at just $2.81. January 2026 dipped further to $1.48. Across 2025, the industry averaged $35.44 per purchase versus the global cross‑industry average of $51.65—roughly 31% lower. Including January 2026, the 13‑month average was $32.83 versus $49.62 globally.
Highs and lows were stark. The yearly high was January’s $64.86; the late‑spring peak topped out at $60.25 in June. The trough arrived at $2.81 in December (and $1.48 in January 2026). The speed of movement was notable: month‑to‑month absolute changes averaged $11.03, more than triple the global benchmark’s $3.33, underscoring a more volatile CPP environment.
Momentum shifted in distinct phases. Q1 cooled rapidly after a hot January, bottoming in April before a spring rebound in May–June. Q3 was a controlled descent, with CPP drifting down into the low‑to‑mid $30s. Q4 diverged from typical auction‑pressure narratives: instead of costs rising, CPP fell sharply from $30.37 in September to $2.81 in December (−91%). The new year reset extended that compression; December to January 2026 saw another −47% step down, mirroring the global benchmark’s own December-to-January drop.
Relative to the global benchmark, Marketing & Advertising swung between brief premiums and extended discounts. The industry sat above market in January (+22%) and again in May–June (+14% to +18%). Most other months tracked below global levels: February and July were about 20–23% lower; August and September widened to 27–43% below; and the gap became extreme in Q4, running 63% below in October, 74% in November, and 94% below in December. January 2026 stayed 94% below global CPP. While the global trend was largely flat through 2025 (−10% from January to December before a sharper January 2026 reset), Marketing & Advertising fell −96% from January to December, reflecting a far choppier, more elastic curve.
In short, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase in the Marketing & Advertising industry across all countries show a high‑volatility year: a spring rebound bookended by a steep early decline and a pronounced Q4–January reset, consistently lower than the cross‑industry global baseline on average. Understanding CPP trends and country‑agnostic ad costs for Marketing & Advertising helps teams contextualize industry ad performance against global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketing & Advertising industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app