Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Marketing & Advertising

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Marketing & Advertising

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Marketing & Advertising showed a dramatic year of Cost per Purchase (CPP) movement across all countries, oscillating between holiday-high costs and unusually soft late‑year pricing. On median, the industry cleared purchases at $42, below the $48 global, all‑industry benchmark, but with far sharper swings. The period opened at $78.86 in November 2024, peaked there, then slid to just $3.25 by November 2025 — a 96% year-over-year compression. Brief rebounds punctuated the decline, notably in late spring, but the broader momentum tilted downward and more volatile than the market.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Marketing & Advertising across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Range and average: CPP for Marketing & Advertising averaged $42.07, ranging from a $78.86 high (Nov 2024) to a $3.25 low (Nov 2025).
  • Start to finish: From $78.86 to $3.25, CPP fell 96% over the year. The global benchmark declined more moderately, from $42.73 to $30.61 (−28%).
  • Monthly rhythm: After December’s $58.97, CPP briefly climbed to $68.60 in January, then slid through April ($25.61). A sharp spring rebound lifted May–June to $58.61–$59.50 before costs cooled through summer ($38.86–$30.17) and hit a new floor in Q4 ($13.03 in October, $3.25 in November).
  • Volatility: Average absolute month-to-month movement was $13.56, nearly 4x the global benchmark’s $3.45, underscoring a choppier purchase-cost environment for the industry.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality was visible yet atypical in the back half. Q4 2024 reflected holiday competition with an elevated November and still-high December. Q1 2025 retrenched: December to March slid 49% (from $58.97 to $30.13), with April marking the trough at $25.61. Spring flipped the script; April to June surged 133% to $59.50. Summer steadied in the high‑$30s to low‑$30s, then Q4 2025 diverged from usual patterns as CPP compressed further — October to November fell another 75% to the year’s low. The cadence reads as: holiday spike, Q1 softening, late‑spring rebound, late‑summer moderation, and an unusually deep Q4 decline.

Country vs. Global

Against the all‑industry global benchmark, Marketing & Advertising alternated between above‑market and below‑average phases:

  • Above market: Nov 2024 (+85% vs. global), Dec (+18%), Jan (+32%), and the May–June rebound (+15% and +23% respectively).
  • Below average: February onward was largely under the benchmark, especially late 2025. July (−17%), August (−24%), September (−39%), October (−71%), and November (−89%).
  • Gap dynamics: The closest alignment occurred in May (+15% versus global), while the widest underperformance appeared in November 2025 (−89%).
  • Trend lines: The global series was steadier (−28% from Nov to Nov), while Marketing & Advertising was choppier and ultimately much lower. H1 2025 averaged $47.5 for the industry versus $51.5 globally; July–November averaged $24.8 versus $44.6 globally.

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per Purchase in the Marketing & Advertising industry across all countries reveal a year defined by sharp peaks and a pronounced late‑year trough, with CPP averaging $42 versus a $48 global baseline. While CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance provide broader context for country-specific ad costs, this view centers on purchase efficiency: a more volatile, more variable industry ad performance pattern than the global market, especially evident in the Q4 2025 compression. Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for the Marketing & Advertising industry across all countries helps contextualize performance against global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketing & Advertising industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.