Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Media

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Media

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The Media industry ran well below the global Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase throughout 2025, delivering consistently cheaper conversions with a choppier monthly rhythm. Costs opened the year near $19, eased through midyear, hit a November trough, and rebounded into December — a classic dip-and-recover profile. The standout outlier arrives in early 2026: a near-zero January reading that breaks from the prior year’s range.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Media across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

In 2025, cost per purchase (CPP) for Media averaged $18.23, starting at $19.09 in January and finishing at $19.40 in December. The yearly high landed in February at $20.31; the low came in November at $15.81, a $4.49 peak-to-trough swing (about 25% of the average). Month-to-month movements averaged $1.74, with the sharpest shifts clustered mid-to-late year: July to August fell by $3.83, and November to December rebounded by $3.59.

Quarterly cadence shows a softening over time: Q1 averaged $19.78, easing to $18.18 in Q2, $17.67 in Q3, and $17.30 in Q4. The December lift pulled the year-end close slightly above the January start (+1.6%), despite the broader downtrend across the middle of the year.

January 2026 breaks pattern: Media CPP prints at $0.37 — far outside the 2025 range and down roughly 98% from December, a single-month anomaly against a year of mid- to high-teens costs.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The year followed a familiar rhythm: firmer costs in early Q1, a steady ease through late spring and summer, and a Q4 trough before a holiday-period bounce. February set the ceiling; June–October marked a sustained softer band; November saw the lowest CPP of the year with a clear rebound in December. This aligns with common seasonal dynamics where performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1.

Country vs. Global

Against the global all-industry benchmark, Media remained materially below market every month. The global 2025 average was $51.65 versus $18.23 for Media — about 65% cheaper on average. The monthly gap was consistent: Media ran 59–70% below global levels, narrowing in July and December (about 59% below) and widening in August and October (about 68–70% below).

Trend lines diverged as well. From January to December 2025, the global benchmark declined from $53.15 to $47.62 (−10%), while Media ended roughly flat (+2%). Volatility looked different in context: absolute monthly moves were similar ($1.74 Media vs. $1.59 global), but proportional swings were larger for Media (about 10% of its mean vs. 3% globally). Global costs also peaked in February and bottomed in November, with a December uptick, mirroring Media’s calendar shape but at substantially higher levels.

In January 2026, both series dropped, though to different degrees: the global all-industry CPP fell to $25.15 (−47% vs. December), while Media’s early reading collapsed to $0.37, a singular outlier relative to 2025 patterns.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost per purchase benchmarks for the Media industry across all countries helps quantify country-specific ad costs in a global context and compare industry ad performance to market-wide patterns. While this report centers on CPP, it complements broader Facebook Ads benchmarks spanning CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance for a fuller read on channel dynamics.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Media industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.