See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all industries in the Netherlands, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase (CPP) moved well above the global benchmark for most of the year, with a mid-year trough and a sharp year-end surge. The market opened elevated, dipped through summer, and then climbed decisively into December, diverging from a globally easing backdrop. Volatility was a defining feature: month-to-month swings were large, and several spikes and dips punctuated the trend.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in the Netherlands compared to the global benchmark.
The Netherlands started 2025 at 87.95 and finished at 106.63, a 21% lift from January to December. The annual average CPP landed at 70.5, versus a global average of 51.4. The local high arrived in December (106.63), while the low hit in July (45.48), producing a wide annual range of about 61 points. In contrast, the global series ranged narrowly from 54.80 (February high) to 45.08 (December low).
The monthly rhythm was choppy. Notable moves included a steep May-to-June drop (−24 points), followed by a July bottom, then a sizable August rebound (+39% vs. July). September climbed again (75.40), only to fall in October (53.94) and then surge twice: +20 points into November and +32 points into December. On average, the Netherlands experienced a 17.4-point absolute swing month to month—an order of magnitude more volatile than the global benchmark’s 1.8-point average shift.
Quarterly medians underscore the arc: Q1 averaged 72.0, Q2 70.4, Q3 61.3 (the softest stretch), and Q4 78.3 (the priciest quarter), with December’s spike driving the finish.
Seasonality divided the year into clear chapters. Early-year CPP was elevated but easing into spring. Late Q2 and early Q3 were softer, culminating in July’s annual low. From there, momentum rebuilt: August regained ground, September extended the rise, and Q4 accelerated sharply, capped by December’s peak.
Globally, the picture was steadier and consistently downward. The benchmark hovered in the low-50s through midyear and continued to soften into Q4, reaching its lowest point in December. In other words, while country-specific ad costs in the Netherlands climbed into year-end, the broader market saw a gentle slide, suggesting local dynamics cut against typical late-year pressures seen in other markets.
Relative to global Facebook Ads benchmarks, the Netherlands ran higher in 11 of 12 months. The sole exception was July, when the Netherlands dipped 7.5% below the global CPP. The narrowest positive gap came in October, when the Netherlands sat only 2% above the benchmark. At its widest, the gap reached 137% in December. Across the full year, the Netherlands averaged a 37% premium to the global CPP.
Trend lines moved in opposite directions: the global benchmark fell 15% from January to December, while the Netherlands rose 21%. The Dutch series was also markedly more volatile, registering frequent double-digit shifts compared to the global market’s small, incremental steps.
In sum, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks across all industries in the Netherlands show a high-cost, high-volatility year with a pronounced Q4 surge against a globally softening trend. Understanding these CPP patterns—alongside related CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps frame industry ad performance and country-specific ad costs in the Netherlands relative to the global benchmark.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Netherlands, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
Late November–early December (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), December (Christmas and Boxing Day sales), Spring holidays (April–June tourism)
CPM and CPC might rise during spring holiday cluster when travel and leisure ads see elevated engagement. Liberation Day (May 5) is mandatory national holiday—ad inventory might shrink. Ad competition increases in late December for holiday promotions. Few summer holidays mean more consistent campaign performance through summer.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app