Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Norway

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Norway

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Norway’s cost per purchase moved through the past year like a series of calm seas interrupted by sudden squalls. For all industries, Facebook Ads benchmarks in Norway started low and steady in late 2024, then broke into three dramatic spikes mid-2025 before easing back. Against the global benchmark—remarkably stable around the high-$40s—Norway displayed far more volatility, with the widest gap in August when country-specific ad costs surged to extreme levels. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Norway compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Norway’s Cost per Purchase (CPP) opened at $28.97 in November 2024 and closed at $111.41 in October 2025—up roughly 284% from start to finish. The year’s high was August 2025 at $4,547.62, while the low was June at $25.82, producing an extraordinary spread of $4,522. Across the 12 months, the average CPP landed at $535, largely inflated by the August spike; the across-month median was closer to $90, reflecting more typical conditions.

The month-by-month rhythm tells the story. Q4 2024 hovered near $29–30. January jumped to $118 (+298% month over month), then cooled through March ($29.74). April lifted to $68.48, setting up a first surge in May ($750.85). That spike collapsed in June ($25.82), only to leap again in July ($519.80) and then break records in August ($4,547.62). A sharp correction followed in September ($151.37) with further easing in October ($111.41).

Volatility was the defining feature. Average month-to-month shifts in Norway were about $961, driven by the August surge and September reversal; excluding those two moves, the average swing still ran near $240. By comparison, the global benchmark’s average monthly move was just $2.40—an order-of-magnitude difference.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Q4 2024 was unusually soft for Norway given typical end-of-year competition, with CPP sitting below $30. Q1 2025 was mixed: a January spike followed by a return to Q4-like levels by March. Q2 became a transition period with April’s lift and May’s outsized spike, while early Q3 saw a full reset in June before another two-stage surge in July and August. The market then cooled into early Q4 (September–October), remaining above early-year troughs but far below the August peak.

Country vs. Global

Against the global baseline—steady between $46 and $54 for most months (average $49.51)—Norway alternated between low and ultra-high. Norway ran below market in five months (November, December, February, March, June), trailing global levels by 23–46%. In the remaining seven months, Norway moved above market, from +33% in April to nearly 90x in August. The global trend was notably even (down ~13% from January to October), while Norway’s line was choppier, marked by three surges (May, July, August) and two sharp resets (June, September).

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Norway show a market marked by calm baselines punctuated by outsized mid-year surges, contrasting with a globally stable CPP in the high-$40s. Understanding CPP trends, CPM analysis context, and CTR performance patterns within country-specific ad costs helps frame Norway’s industry ad performance against the global benchmark.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Norway, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Norway Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 17Constitution Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Singles Day), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), Spring holiday period (April–May travel and tourism)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter and Ascension when Norwegians travel or spend time on leisure. Constitution Day (May 17) is widely celebrated—media activity may increase and ad competition could intensify. Most public holidays result in shop closures; ad inventory may shrink during holidays. Pentecost weekend may reduce weekday competition.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.