Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Public Administration in Norway

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Public Administration in Norway

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks: time-series summary and global comparison

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. It looks at cost-per-purchase (COST_PER_PURCHASE) trends for industry Public Administration and target country Norway compared to the global trend. Note: no selected data points were available for Public Administration in Norway during the period, so the summary focuses on the global baseline and indicates where in-country comparison is not possible.

Key takeaways

  • The selected dataset for Public Administration in Norway contains no monthly observations; a direct in-country vs. global comparison cannot be calculated.
  • Global baseline costs averaged 47.73 over the 13-month period, with a median of 46.96.
  • High point: February 2025 at 53.89 (+12.9% above the period average). Low point: September 2025 at 32.29 (−32.3% below average).
  • From September 2024 to September 2025, the global baseline decreased by 30.7%.
  • Volatility was moderate most months (average absolute month-to-month change ≈ 2.99, about 6.3% of the mean), with two standout moves: a December lift and a sharp September dip.
  • Seasonality is evident: costs rose into late Q4 and peaked through January–February, then trended down into late summer.

What we analyzed

  • Metric: cost per purchase (COST_PER_PURCHASE)
  • Industry: Public Administration
  • Country: Norway
  • Time frame: September 2024 through September 2025
  • Datasets:
  • Selected: no data points available for the specified industry/country.
  • Global baseline: monthly medians used for comparison and directional context.

Global baseline: monthly performance highlights

  • Average: 47.73; median: 46.96; range: 21.60 (from 32.29 to 53.89).
  • Highs and lows:
  • Highest month: February 2025 at 53.89.
  • Lowest month: September 2025 at 32.29.
  • Month-to-month movements:
  • October 2024 was flat vs. September (+0.07).
  • November 2024 softened (−3.48), then December rebounded strongly (+8.34, +19.3% vs. November).
  • January–February 2025 remained elevated (+0.78 and +1.58).
  • Gradual easing March–May (cumulative −2.92).
  • June dropped (−4.01), followed by smaller declines in July (−0.75) and August (−0.52).
  • September 2025 saw a sharp drop (−13.40, −29.4% vs. August).

Seasonality and volatility at a glance

  • Seasonal pattern: costs typically firm in Q4 and remain elevated into January–February, consistent with broader Facebook Ads benchmarks around holiday and post-holiday demand.
  • Volatility profile: most months moved within roughly ±3 points, indicating moderate variability, punctuated by December’s surge and September’s pronounced decline.

Comparison to the selected market

  • Because there are no observations for Public Administration in Norway, relative positioning (above market, below average, or in line) versus the global baseline cannot be determined for this period.
  • The global trend provides a directional benchmark that can be referenced until in-country data becomes available.

Understanding COST_PER_PURCHASE benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Public Administration and Norway helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Public Administration industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Norway, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Norway Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 17Constitution Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Singles Day), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), Spring holiday period (April–May travel and tourism)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter and Ascension when Norwegians travel or spend time on leisure. Constitution Day (May 17) is widely celebrated—media activity may increase and ad competition could intensify. Most public holidays result in shop closures; ad inventory may shrink during holidays. Pentecost weekend may reduce weekday competition.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.