Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Recreation and Travel

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Recreation and Travel

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Recreation and Travel ran hot across all countries in 2025, with cost per purchase consistently sitting well above the global all‑industry benchmark. The year opened quietly, then surged in bursts—first in February, then decisively through Q4—ending at the annual high. Volatility was a defining feature: sharp spikes and short pullbacks rather than a smooth climb. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Recreation and Travel across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Cost per purchase (CPP) in Recreation and Travel started at $56.06 in January and finished at $186.39 in December—up 233% from the start. The annual average landed at $108, more than double the global all‑industry average of $51.40 (about 2.1x the market).

The low came in January ($56), followed by the first jolt in February ($154, a $98 jump month over month). March cooled to $70, and April–May settled into a tight band around $91. Mid‑year eased further—June at $85.56 and July at $78.96—before momentum rebuilt: $90.77 in August, $112.86 in September, then a fresh surge to $150.43 in October. November dipped to $126.54, and December closed at the peak ($186.39). Across the year, the average month‑to‑month swing was $33.7, or roughly 31% of the annual mean—far choppier than the global benchmark’s $1.77 average monthly move.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm of the year showed three distinct phases:

  • Q1 was uneven: a soft January, an overshoot in February, and normalization in March (Q1 average: ~$93.6).
  • Q2 stabilized around the low $90s (Q2 average: ~$89.2), with the tightest spread of the year.
  • Q3 rebuilt from July’s local trough to September’s $112.86 (Q3 average: ~$94.9).
  • Q4 accelerated sharply, averaging ~$154.5 with October and December as standout highs—consistent with heavier late‑year demand and rising competition typical in travel seasonality.

Country vs. Global

Recreation and Travel CPP stayed above market every month. The premium was narrowest in January (+5% vs. the global benchmark) and widened meaningfully by late year: +112% in September, +186% in October, +168% in November, and +313% in December. While the global all‑industry trend softened modestly from $53.25 in January to $45.08 in December (−15%), Recreation and Travel rose +233% over the same period. Volatility was also markedly higher: average monthly swings were about 19x the global benchmark, underscoring a more turbulent cost environment for this industry.

Closing

In 2025, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase in Recreation and Travel across all countries showed sustained above‑market levels, pronounced Q4 escalation, and materially higher volatility than the global norm. While this summary focuses on CPP, it complements broader Facebook Ads benchmarks—spanning CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—to frame industry ad performance and country‑specific ad costs at a global scale. Understanding cost per purchase benchmarks for Recreation and Travel across all countries helps marketers gauge how this category’s acquisition costs compare to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Recreation and Travel industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.