See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Retail’s cost per purchase (CPP) across all countries ran consistently below the global cross‑industry benchmark in 2025 and trended downward through the year. The category started elevated in January, lifted briefly in October, then fell sharply into year‑end — a two‑stage slide that widened the gap versus the market. Volatility was also higher than the global average, with a particularly pronounced reset in November and December.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Retail across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Retail CPP averaged $35.75 in 2025, ranging from a high of $41.48 in January to a low of $26.14 in December — a $15.34 spread, roughly 43% of the annual average. The year opened at $41.48, eased through mid‑year, briefly rebounded to $39.00 in October, then fell to $29.12 in November and $26.14 in December. From January to December, Retail’s CPP compressed 37%.
Monthly rhythm showed modest back‑and‑forth early on: February dipped to $37.45 (−10% vs. January), March lifted to $38.72, and April edged higher to $39.70. A steadier decline followed into June ($33.91), with small summer recoveries in July ($35.33) and August ($36.45). The sharpest single‑month move was October to November, a $9.87 drop (−25%), followed by a further −10% in December. Five of the final seven months landed at or below $36, underscoring a second‑half slide.
By contrast, the global benchmark averaged $51.40, with a narrower range: $54.80 at the high (February) to $45.08 at the low (December), a $9.72 spread (19% of its average). The market declined 15% from January to December — a milder descent than Retail’s.
Volatility highlights the difference: Retail’s median CPP shifted by an average of $3.03 month‑to‑month, versus $1.77 for the global benchmark. The step‑down in Q4 was the major source of Retail’s higher swing.
Quarter by quarter, Retail stair‑stepped lower: Q1 averaged $39.22, Q2 $36.84, Q3 $35.53, and Q4 $31.42. October was an outlier pop before the category’s two‑month trough into year‑end. This contrasts with the broader market, which was relatively steady from Q2 to Q3 before softening in Q4 (Q4 global average: $48.30).
While country‑specific ad costs can vary, this all‑countries view shows a Retail pattern that softened progressively through 2025, with the most pronounced contraction concentrated in November and December.
Retail’s CPP sat below market every month, by 22% to 42%. The gap was narrowest in January (−22%) and widest in December (−42%), widening notably in Q4 as Retail fell faster than the benchmark. On a quarterly basis, Retail’s Q4 average ($31.42) trailed the global $48.30 by roughly 35%. For the full year, Retail averaged about 30% below the global cross‑industry CPP.
The global trend eased gradually (−15% from January to December), while Retail’s trajectory was steeper and more volatile (−37%), with a choppier mid‑year and a decisive two‑month drop at the finish.
Within Facebook Ads benchmarks, cost‑per‑purchase for Retail across all countries shows a clear 2025 descent, more volatile and consistently below the global average. Understanding cost per purchase benchmarks for the Retail industry across all countries helps advertisers gauge purchase efficiency and compare performance to global patterns alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Retail industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app