Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Singapore

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Singapore

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Singapore’s Facebook Ads cost per purchase tells a story of a market that runs hotter and moves faster than the world at large. For all industries in Singapore, 2025 opened below the global benchmark, then swung sharply higher and stayed elevated for most of the year. A March spike set the tone for a high-cost middle stretch, followed by an uneven Q4 with a brief plateau before a sharp November reset. Month-to-month volatility was a defining feature, with swings far steeper than the global rhythm.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Singapore compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across 2025, Singapore’s median cost per purchase (CPP) averaged $73, versus a $51 global average. The year began at $40 in January, dipped to the annual low of $28 in February, then vaulted to the high of $103 in March—an overnight regime change of +$75 month over month. From April through October, CPP held mostly in a high band ($85–$92), featuring:

  • April at $90, May easing to $65, and June rebounding to $85.
  • A steady Q3 plateaus: $70 in July, $90 in August, $92 in September.
  • October maintained the high ground at $91.

The late-year picture changed quickly: November fell to $55 before a partial rebound to $65 in December. Taken together, Singapore finished the year higher than it started (+62% from January to December), but with wide amplitude. The monthly absolute change averaged $21—about ten times the swing most marketers would expect in steadier markets.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed up, but through Singapore’s own lens. Q1 was uneven: a soft January–February followed by a March spike that reset the baseline higher. Q2 stayed elevated on average despite May’s breather. Q3 was the steadiest high-cost period, with three consecutive months near or above $90. Q4 was mixed: an October peak, a pronounced November dip, and a modest December recovery. Globally, performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with costs often easing into year-end; Singapore mirrored the softening in November but from a much higher perch.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, Singapore spent most of the year above market:

  • Averages: Singapore $73 vs. global $51 (about 42% higher).
  • Momentum: Global CPP trended down 15% from January to December (53 to 45), while Singapore rose 62% over the same span, but with sharper swings.
  • Volatility: Singapore’s average monthly move was ~$21 vs. ~$1.8 globally—roughly 12x more volatile.
  • Monthly gaps: Singapore under-ran the world only in January (−24%) and February (−50%). The gap flipped in March (+94% above global) and stayed positive thereafter. The tightest spread came in November (+17%); the widest was March (+94%).

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Singapore in 2025 were elevated and markedly more volatile than global norms—defined by a Q1 surge, a high-cost mid-year plateau, and a mixed Q4. Understanding cost per purchase trends in Singapore helps frame country-specific ad costs against global Facebook Ads benchmarks and clarifies how industry ad performance in this market diverges from worldwide patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Singapore, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Singapore Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 29Chinese New Year Day 1
Jan 30Chinese New Year Day 2
Mar 31Hari Raya Puasa
Apr 18Good Friday
May 1Labour Day
May 12Vesak Day
Jun 7Hari Raya Haji
Aug 9National Day
Oct 20Deepavali
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

Late January (Chinese New Year), October–December (Deepavali, National Day promotions, Christmas), Mid-year retail events

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during Chinese New Year and Deepavali for gifting, food, and apparel categories. Good Friday, Hari Raya, and Vesak Day long weekends could shift consumer behavior and spike media consumption. National Day promotions might elevate ad costs in entertainment and tourism. Singapore's small, affluent market means events can have noticeable retail impact.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.