Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Singapore

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Singapore

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

All industries in Singapore saw a choppy but ultimately deflationary year for Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase (CPP), running below the global benchmark most months yet swinging more sharply month to month. The story opens with an unusually expensive November 2024 peak, followed by a swift correction into early 2025, a sharp March rebound, then a mostly subdued stretch that briefly converged with global costs in October before sliding to the year’s low in November 2025. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Singapore compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Singapore’s median CPP started at 80.94 in November 2024 and ended at 26.04 in November 2025, a 68% decline across the period. The annual average landed at 41.95, with a wide range from a high of 80.94 (Nov 2024) to a low of 26.04 (Nov 2025). Volatility was the other headline: average month-over-month absolute movement was 13.6 points—about four times the global pace (3.45).

Key movements punctuated the year. From November to December 2024, CPP fell 41% (80.94 → 47.55) and continued down to a February trough of 27.90. March delivered the year’s sharpest rebound, jumping 122% month over month to 61.99. That surge cooled quickly: April dropped to 43.24, May to 32.32, and June modestly steadied at 34.13. A mid-year rebuild lifted CPP from 26.64 in July to 41.82 in September (+57%), peaking for the back half at 45.09 in October before a sudden November pullback to 26.04 (−42% m/m).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed up as a high-cost Q4 2024, a soft early Q1, and a March spike that reset the year. Q2 (Apr–Jun) and Q3 (Jul–Sep) were comparatively restrained, with gradual gains through late summer. Performance typically tightens into Q4 as competition rises; in Singapore’s series, October aligned with that pattern—near the year’s late high—followed by a notable November drop as costs cooled again.

Country vs. Global

On average, Singapore’s CPP ran about 13% below the global benchmark (41.95 vs. 48.06). After the November 2024 spike, Singapore trailed the global level in 10 of the next 12 months, briefly outperforming in March (+18% vs. global) and essentially matching in October (−1%). At the widest premium, Singapore sat 89% above global in November 2024; at the widest discount, it lagged by 48% in February 2025. The global curve rose steadily from November 2024 into February 2025 (+26%), hovered around the low-50s through late summer, and then eased into a late-year slide (−33% from October to November). Singapore followed a choppier path—deeper early-year trough, steeper March lift, then a below-market groove through most of the year.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase across all industries in Singapore show a market that is more volatile than the global trend, with a dramatic Q4 2024 spike, a quick early-2025 correction, and consistent below-benchmark costs for most of the year. Understanding these CPP trends, along with country-specific ad costs and broader industry ad performance patterns, helps frame CPM analysis, CPC trends, and CTR performance discussions within a realistic, data-grounded context for Singapore versus the global benchmark.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Singapore, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Singapore Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 29Chinese New Year Day 1
Jan 30Chinese New Year Day 2
Mar 31Hari Raya Puasa
Apr 18Good Friday
May 1Labour Day
May 12Vesak Day
Jun 7Hari Raya Haji
Aug 9National Day
Oct 20Deepavali
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

Late January (Chinese New Year), October–December (Deepavali, National Day promotions, Christmas), Mid-year retail events

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during Chinese New Year and Deepavali for gifting, food, and apparel categories. Good Friday, Hari Raya, and Vesak Day long weekends could shift consumer behavior and spike media consumption. National Day promotions might elevate ad costs in entertainment and tourism. Singapore's small, affluent market means events can have noticeable retail impact.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.