Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Software Development in Italy

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Software Development in Italy

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads benchmarks summary: cost per purchase

This analysis looks at cost per purchase trends for industry Software Development and target country Italy compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

  • Overall level: Italy’s Software Development cost per purchase (CPP) averages $75.69 from Oct 2024 to Aug 2025, about 54% above the global baseline average of $49.24 over the same months.
  • Volatility: Italy shows high month‑to‑month volatility (average absolute change ~27.6%), versus a steady global baseline (~4.7%).
  • Highs and lows: Italy’s CPP ranges from a low of $41.94 (Nov 2024) to a high of $125.07 (Jun 2025). The global baseline ranges narrowly between $43.19 (Nov 2024) and $53.89 (Feb 2025).
  • Trend: Italy rises about 40% from Oct 2024 to Aug 2025, while the global baseline slips ~2%.
  • Seasonality: The global trend is stable with a mild uplift in winter and softer summer. Italy departs from this with a pronounced late‑spring/early‑summer spike.

Selected market performance (Software Development, Italy)

  • Average CPP: $75.69 across 11 months.
  • High/low:
  • High: $125.07 in Jun 2025 (also elevated in May at $121.34).
  • Low: $41.94 in Nov 2024.
  • Range: $83.13 between the monthly high and low, underscoring significant dispersion.
  • Direction of travel: From $58.17 in Oct 2024 to $81.33 in Aug 2025, a +39.8% increase.
  • Volatility:
  • Average absolute month‑to‑month change: ~27.6%.
  • Notable moves: -27.9% in Nov; +110.6% jump Apr→May; +3.1% May→Jun continuation; -24.0% Jun→Jul and -14.5% Jul→Aug corrections.
  • Notable periods:
  • Q4 2024: Dip in Nov to the series low, followed by a Dec rebound ($55.79).
  • Late spring/early summer 2025: Sharp spike to $121–$125 (May–Jun), then a normalization through Jul–Aug ($95.10 → $81.33).

Comparison to global baseline

  • Level comparison:
  • Average: Italy sits 54% above market ($75.69 vs. $49.24).
  • By month (illustrative): +24.6% in Oct, -2.9% in Nov (one month below market), +8.3% in Dec, +41.3% in Feb, +138% in May, +166% in Jun, +78% in Aug.
  • Baseline dynamics:
  • Average CPP: $49.24 (Oct 2024–Aug 2025).
  • High/low: $53.89 in Feb; $43.19 in Nov.
  • Trend: Slight decline from $46.67 in Oct to $45.69 in Aug (-2.1%).
  • Volatility: Low and stable (~4.7% average absolute month‑to‑month change).
  • Relative positioning: Italy is predominantly above market, briefly below in Nov, and dramatically above market in May–Jun.

Seasonality and patterns

  • Global pattern: Costs remain in the mid‑$40s to low‑$50s, with a modest winter uptick and gentle softening into summer.
  • Italy (Software Development): Seasonality diverges from the global norm. After a Q4 dip and winter stabilization, CPP accelerates sharply in late spring/early summer before easing in mid‑summer. This creates a more pronounced seasonal hump than the global benchmark.

Bottom line

The Software Development segment in Italy exhibits higher‑than‑market cost per purchase levels, pronounced late‑spring/early‑summer spikes, and materially greater volatility than the global baseline. Understanding cost per purchase benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Software Development and Italy helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Software Development industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Italy, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Italy Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
Apr 25Liberation Day
May 1Labour Day
Jun 2Republic Day
Aug 15Ferragosto
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26St. Stephen's Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Christmas & post‑Christmas sales (late December), Ferragosto (mid‑August) summer tourism, Back‑to‑school (September)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might increase during spring holidays when Italians engage in travel or leisure. Ferragosto may see travel and hospitality ads face high competition while retail CPMs dip. Late November and December see ad demand surges. 'Ponte' long weekends could affect ad pacing with stronger performance on adjacent weekdays.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.