Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in South Africa

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in South Africa

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

South Africa’s cost per purchase showed a year defined by extremes: a dramatic December spike far above the market, followed by long stretches priced far below the global benchmark. The pattern suggests sharp swings rather than a steady climb or decline, with the period ultimately ending near where it began. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in South Africa compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Starting from November 2024 at just 0.13, South Africa’s cost per purchase vaulted to a peak of 305.77 in December—the clear outlier of the year—before normalizing to 29.08 in January 2025. It then climbed to 49.19 in February and 61.33 in March, dipped sharply to 4.89 in May (April not observed), rebounded to 23.02 in June, and slid to ultra-low levels in July (0.12) and August (0.18). The period closed essentially where it started, despite violent interim moves.

Across the nine observed months, South Africa averaged 52.63, though the single December surge pulls that figure upward; the median month sat at a much lower 23.02. The market’s high was 305.77 (December) and the low was 0.12 (July), yielding a broad range of 305.66. Month-to-month movements were steep: −90% from December to January, +69% January to February, +25% February to March, then −92% into May, +371% into June, −99.5% into July, and +55% into August. On average, absolute monthly moves were about 89 points—exceptionally volatile for a cost metric.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed up most forcefully in Q4: December was the year’s cost crest in South Africa, consistent with heightened holiday competition in many markets. Early Q1 (January) reset to more moderate levels, with momentum building into February–March. The Q2 picture was mixed, with a sharp reset by May and a partial recovery in June. Q3 opened soft, with July and August printing unusually low costs. Overall, the rhythm was not a smooth seasonal curve but a series of spikes and collapses.

Country vs. Global

Compared with the global baseline, South Africa was highly uneven. Globally, cost per purchase averaged 49.9 from November 2024 through August 2025, ranging mostly in the mid‑40s to low‑50s, with relatively modest month-to-month changes averaging 2.4 points. South Africa matched the market average on paper (52.6 vs. 49.9) but typically ran below it: seven of nine observed months were cheaper than global, often by 40% to 100%. The narrowest gap occurred in February (−9% vs. global), while the widest deficits were in July and August (about −100%). The only months above market were March (+17%) and the outsized December (+513%).

In short, the global line rose into February and hovered around the low‑50s, while South Africa’s path was far choppier—defined by a December spike and repeated troughs that pulled most months well below global levels.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase across all industries in South Africa highlights a market with extreme volatility, punctuated by a December surge and prolonged periods of below‑market pricing. These country-specific ad costs provide context to compare industry ad performance against steadier global patterns, alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance indicators.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting South Africa, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

South Africa Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 21Human Rights Day
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Family Day
Apr 27Freedom Day
May 1Workers' Day
Jun 16Youth Day
Aug 9National Women's Day
Sep 24Heritage Day
Dec 16Day of Reconciliation
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Day of Goodwill

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), December (Christmas & Day of Goodwill), Mid-year retail (June Youth Day promotions)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during long weekends like Human Rights Day, Freedom Day, and Heritage Day as leisure and travel-related media consumption increases. Retail CPMs may spike in late November–December for holiday shopping. Youth Day and National Women's Day might drive regional campaigns. Weekend extensions across public holidays may benefit weekend campaigns.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.