Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Spain

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Spain

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Spain’s Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase (CPP) tracked below the global benchmark for most of the first half of the year, then swung sharply higher in late summer before settling close to global levels by year-end. The headline: a volatile market with a pronounced August spike, a soft Q1 base, and a steadier Q4 finish. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Spain compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across 2025, Spain’s CPP averaged 46.47, with a low of 27.92 in January and a high of 78.69 in August. The year opened at 27.92 and closed at 48.38, a 73% lift from January to December. Movement was choppy: a gentle rise into February (+3.29) and a small pullback in March (−1.57) gave way to a sharp April jump (+17.81). After near-flatness in June (−0.08), July fell hard (−18.89), only to be followed by the standout surge in August (+45.76). A September correction (−27.06) reset CPP toward the 50s, with Q4 moving in a narrower band: +7.09 in October, −11.35 in November, and a mild +1.01 in December.

Volatility tells the story. Spain’s average absolute month-to-month change was 12.6 points, far higher than the global benchmark’s 1.6, signaling substantially sharper swings at the country level than the world average.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Spain followed a clear seasonal rhythm. Q1 was the trough, averaging 29.59 and setting the year’s floor. Q2 climbed to 50.39 as CPP normalized in the low 50s. Q3 was the peak at 54.42, dominated by August’s outsized spike to 78.69 before a September pullback. Q4 settled into a more consistent range, averaging 51.49, with October the high point at 58.72 and November/December hovering near the upper 40s.

Globally, the pattern was smoother: CPP averaged 51.65 for 2025, starting at 53.15 and easing to 47.62 by December, with only one notable dip in November. Spain’s curve, by contrast, featured a deeper Q1 valley and a more pronounced summer crest.

Spain vs. Global

Relative to Facebook Ads benchmarks worldwide, Spain averaged about 10% below the global CPP (46.47 vs. 51.65). The year split into distinct phases:

  • Q1: Spain trailed sharply (29.59 vs. 53.61, roughly 45% lower).
  • Q2: The gap narrowed (50.39 vs. 51.88, around 3% lower).
  • Q3: Spain moved above market (54.42 vs. 51.87, about 5% higher), led by August at +48% versus global.
  • Q4: Spain stayed modestly above (51.49 vs. 49.25, +5%).

Month by month, Spain was below the global CPP in seven months and at/above in five. The widest discount came in January (about 48% below global), while the widest premium came in August (about 48% above). The narrowest gap appeared in November, effectively at parity.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Spain show a year defined by a low-cost Q1, an aggressive summer spike, and a steadier Q4 that converged toward global levels. For marketers comparing country-specific ad costs, CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance with CPP in focus, these Spain benchmarks provide a clear, data-driven view of how industry ad performance in 2025 diverged from—and re-aligned with—the global trend.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Spain, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Spain Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 17Maundy Thursday (some regions)
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Easter Monday (some regions)
May 1Labour Day
Aug 15Assumption Day
Oct 13National Day of Spain
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 6Constitution Day
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November–early December (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Mid-August (summer promotions), December (Christmas & post-Christmas sales)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might increase during Semana Santa (Holy Week) and May Day, particularly for travel and tourism campaigns. 'Puentes' (bridge days) could reduce weekday inventory while pre-holiday traffic boosts media consumption. Black Friday typically marks sharp rises in retail competition. Late December brings peak ad volumes and e‑commerce CPM spikes.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.