Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks in Sweden

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase in Sweden

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all industries in Sweden, Facebook Ads cost per purchase in 2025 traced a dramatic arc: an exceptionally expensive January, a sharp deflation through Q2, a late‑summer rebound, and a soft close in December. The Swedish market averaged 75.0 for the year, substantially above the global benchmark at 51.7, but with far sharper month‑to‑month swings. January was the outlier peak, while June and December clustered at the low end — a “double trough” that bookended a mid‑year resurgence. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Sweden compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Sweden opened the year at 172.28 in January and ended at 42.20 in December — a 76% decline from start to finish. The annual high was that January spike (172.28), while the low landed in December (42.20), narrowly under June’s 42.27. The full‑year average settled at 75.0, reflecting a wide trading range of 130 points.

The month‑to‑month path showed distinct phases:

  • Q1 deflation: 172.28 in January to 122.15 in February, then down to 67.14 in March.
  • Q2 compression and stabilization: April 53.77, May 64.00, June 42.27.
  • Late‑summer lift: July 49.86, August 85.69 (a sharp jump), September 74.34.
  • Mixed Q4: October 76.56, easing to 49.64 in November and touching the low at 42.20 in December.

Volatility stood out. Sweden’s average absolute monthly swing was about 22 points, far choppier than the global benchmark’s 1.6 points, underscoring a market that moved quickly and often.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The year began unusually elevated, then costs cooled rapidly into early Q2. From late July through October, cost per purchase climbed again, with August registering the most pronounced resurgence. The final quarter was mixed: October remained elevated, November eased, and December fell to a new low. Globally, cost per purchase typically tightens within a relatively narrow band, and Q4 often brings firmer competition; Sweden diverged from that rhythm by softening into year‑end.

Sweden vs. Global

Relative to Facebook Ads benchmarks worldwide, Sweden was consistently higher but notably more dynamic. The Swedish average (75.0) exceeded the global 2025 average (51.7) by about 45%. Ten of twelve months ran above the global level; only June (−17% vs. global) and December (−11%) came in lower. The gap was widest in January, when Sweden’s cost per purchase was roughly 3.2x the global median (+224%). It narrowed substantially through mid‑year and briefly inverted during June and December. Directionally, the global series stayed steady within a 47–55 band and slipped about 10% from January to December, while Sweden fell 76% over the same span — a steeper descent with a pronounced summer rebound.

Closing

These Facebook Ads benchmarks highlight how cost per purchase moved across all industries in Sweden: elevated on average, highly volatile, and marked by a dramatic January spike, a Q2 compression, and a late‑summer lift before a softer December. Understanding cost per purchase trends — alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance — helps put country‑specific ad costs and industry ad performance in context. This summary captures cost per purchase benchmarks for all industries in Sweden compared to the global pattern.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Sweden, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Sweden Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 6National Day
Jun 21Midsummer Day
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday is huge), December (Christmas and post-Christmas sales), June (Midsummer seasonal promotions), January (Winter sale season)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPMs might spike during Black Friday and early December, especially in e‑commerce and fashion. Easter and Midsummer holidays often decrease weekday inventory but increase media usage during long weekends. Midsummer tends to be quiet in retail but active in travel and food sectors. Post-Christmas sales in January still see high digital ad demand.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.