See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Cost per Purchase (CPP) for all industries in Sweden moved on a very different rhythm than the global Facebook Ads benchmarks. While the global market stayed relatively steady around the $49–54 range, Sweden’s country-specific ad costs swung dramatically—from bargain-level lows in November and June to sharp spikes in January and especially May. The year opened with an expensive Q1, cooled into early Q2, then whipsawed with a May surge before settling into mid-tier costs through early Q4.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Sweden compared to the global benchmark.
Across the 12-month window, Sweden’s CPP averaged $105.51—about 114% above the global average of $49.33. The median tells a different story: Sweden’s median CPP was $68 (vs. a global median of ~$50), highlighting how a few extreme months skewed the mean.
Starting at $34.28 in November 2024 and ending at $72.15 in October 2025, Sweden finished roughly 110% higher than it began. The high point was May 2025 at $367.73, followed by the low in June at $32.55—a dramatic 11x swing month-to-month. Other notable peaks included January ($172.28) and February ($149.30). The troughs clustered in November ($34.28), June ($32.55), and July ($36.81).
Volatility was the defining feature. Sweden’s average absolute month-to-month change was about $95, compared with only $2.6 globally—indicating far sharper swings than the baseline. The most intense moves: a +$304 jump in May and a -$335 drop into June.
The pattern aligns with familiar seasonal pressure points, but amplified. Costs lifted into December ($61.38), surged in January–February (peaking at $172–$149), then retreated in March–April ($89 and $64). May delivered an outlier spike ($368), followed by a June reset ($33) and a modest July ($37). Late summer firmed ($125 in August) before settling into moderate levels through September–October ($62–$72). In short: an expensive Q1, a volatile Q2 marked by a single extreme month, softer summer, and a measured early Q4.
Globally, CPP peaked in February (~$53.84) and drifted down to October (~$43.33), a smoother, low-volatility descent typical of marketplace stabilization after Q1.
Sweden was above the global benchmark in 9 of 12 months, often significantly. The gap was widest in May (over 7x the global level) and January (more than 3x). It narrowed to roughly 20–25% in November, December, April, and July. Where the global trend was steady (−19% from February high to October), Sweden’s was choppier, punctuated by rapid spikes and resets. On average, Sweden’s CPP ran 35% above the global median and more than double the global mean.
Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-purchase benchmarks for all industries in Sweden—set against the global baseline—highlights a market with elevated country-specific ad costs and exceptional volatility. This CPP analysis helps frame industry ad performance within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks and clarifies how Sweden’s trend diverges from more stable global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Sweden, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
Late November (Black Friday is huge), December (Christmas and post-Christmas sales), June (Midsummer seasonal promotions), January (Winter sale season)
CPMs might spike during Black Friday and early December, especially in e‑commerce and fashion. Easter and Midsummer holidays often decrease weekday inventory but increase media usage during long weekends. Midsummer tends to be quiet in retail but active in travel and food sectors. Post-Christmas sales in January still see high digital ad demand.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app