Compare ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type.
October 2025 - September 2026
Benchmark observations based on the selected data
Sweden’s cost-per-purchase moved through a year of spikes and pullbacks, running noticeably above the global benchmark and showing higher month-to-month swings. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for All industries in Sweden compared to the global benchmark.
From July 2025 to June 2026 Sweden’s median cost per purchase averaged about 59.5, starting at 55.21 in July 2025 and finishing at 56.72 in June 2026 — a modest net rise of roughly 2.7% over the 12 months. The high-water mark was August 2025 at 85.69 and the low was November 2025 at 47.07, a raw range of about 38.6 points. Month-to-month absolute movements averaged ~12.4 points, which is roughly a 21% typical swing relative to Sweden’s mean.
By contrast, the global baseline averaged about 49.9 across the same period. Sweden ran about 19% above that global median over the year. Peaks in Sweden were pronounced: August 2025 was ~64% above the global August benchmark, and May 2026 was ~53% above the global May number.
The rhythm of Sweden’s cost per purchase shows two prominent spikes and several softer troughs. A sharp surge in August 2025 set the year’s high, followed by a cooling into late autumn and the November trough. Early Q1 (January–March 2026) stayed lower relative to the summer peak, with March dipping below the global benchmark. May 2026 produced a second strong lift before rolling back toward the mid-50s in June.
These movements create a pattern where summer and late-spring periods produced the largest cost pressure, while late autumn and early winter showed the softer lows. Performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1; in Sweden that rebound was muted compared with the global baseline and punctuated by a May spike.
Compared with the global baseline, Sweden was generally above market. Across the year Sweden’s monthly costs ranged from roughly 1–64% higher than global figures. The narrowest gap occurred in November 2025 when Sweden was only about 1–2% above the baseline. Sweden dipped slightly below the global number in January 2026 (about 1.8% lower) and March 2026 (about 4.9% lower). Volatility was a distinguishing factor: Sweden’s average monthly absolute change (~12.4 points) was roughly four times the baseline monthly change (~3.1 points), making Sweden a more volatile market for cost-per-purchase over this 12‑month window.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase and All industries in Sweden offers a clear read on how country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance compare to global CPM analysis, CPC trends, and CTR performance baselines — especially when monitoring spikes in August and May and the higher volatility that characterizes Sweden’s year.
Facebook advertising cost benchmarks
Facebook advertising costs vary by industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objective. Ad costs vary across industries because of competition, audience demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Sweden, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Campaign objectives affect costs because Facebook optimizes delivery for different goals. The data shows median values across multiple campaigns. Results can vary with ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
A small share of campaigns has extremely high CPP values. Those outliers can inflate an average. The median is the midpoint across campaigns, so it better represents a typical result.
The data shows industry median benchmarks. Costs can vary with targeting, creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Analyze Facebook ad performance
See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
Spot creative patterns that affect ROAS.
Create reports without spreadsheets.
The dataset includes over $3B in Facebook ad spend from thousands of ad accounts that use Superads to analyze and improve campaigns. Every data point is anonymized and aggregated. It does not expose an individual advertiser.
The dataset updates as new ad data is available.
Late November (Black Friday), December (Christmas and post-Christmas sales), June (Midsummer seasonal promotions), January (Winter sale season)
CPMs may rise during Black Friday and early December, especially in e-commerce and fashion. Easter and Midsummer holidays often reduce weekday inventory while increasing media usage during long weekends. Midsummer is quieter in retail and active in travel and food. Post-Christmas sales in January still bring high digital ad demand.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. A higher CPA can work when the margin supports it. Measure CPA with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help advertisers stay within a target CPA. It suits experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It provides more control and requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Compare cost benchmarks for Facebook advertising metrics.
Cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across markets
Click-through rate benchmarks for Facebook Ads
Cost per lead benchmarks across markets
Cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
App install cost benchmarks