Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Textiles

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Textiles

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads benchmarks summary: cost per purchase

This analysis looks at cost per purchase trends for industry Textiles and target country all countries available compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

  • Across Sep 2024–Jun 2025, Textiles’ cost per purchase tracked well below the global baseline on average (about 42% lower), with one month briefly above market (Nov 2024).
  • Seasonality is visible: a Q4 run-up peaking in November, a secondary lift in February, and notable softening into spring with a sharp June low. The global trend also rises through Q4 into Q1–Q2.
  • Volatility in Textiles is high (average absolute month-over-month change ~54%), versus a steady global baseline (~5%).

Textiles cost per purchase: key statistics

  • Average: 28.83
  • Median: 32.88
  • High: 44.35 (Nov 2024)
  • Low: 6.85 (Jun 2025)
  • Change from first to last month: -57.9% (Sep 2024 to Jun 2025)
  • Notable moves:
  • Sep → Oct: +100% (16.30 to 32.54)
  • Oct → Nov: +36% (to the period high)
  • Dec → Jan: -33%
  • Jan → Feb: +53% (secondary spike)
  • Mar → Apr: -51% (sharp dip)
  • Apr → May: +108% (rebound)
  • May → Jun: -80% (new low)

Interpretation for marketers: Textiles shows pronounced peaks in late Q4 and February, followed by steep retracements into April and especially June.

Global baseline comparison (same months)

  • Average: 49.63
  • Median: 51.25
  • High: 53.89 (Feb 2025)
  • Low: 43.19 (Nov 2024)
  • Change from first to last month: +0.8% (Sep 2024 to Jun 2025)
  • Volatility (avg absolute m/m): ~5%

Relative positioning: Textiles vs. global

  • On average, Textiles ran at 58% of the global cost per purchase (about 41.9% below market).
  • Month-by-month comparison:
  • Below market in 9 of 10 months.
  • Above market in Nov 2024 only: 44.35 vs. 43.19 (+2.7%).
  • Biggest gaps below market: Jun 2025 (-85%), Apr 2025 (-68%), Sep 2024 (-65%).
  • Seasonal alignment:
  • Both series show Q4/Q1 elevation, with the baseline peaking Jan–Feb.
  • Textiles exhibits stronger amplitude: a pronounced October–November surge, a February lift, and outsized declines in April and June.

What this means for benchmarking

  • Textiles’ average and median costs per purchase are materially below the global baseline, with a lower high and a much lower low.
  • The category displays high month-to-month variability, in contrast to a steady global pattern.
  • Seasonality is evident: costs typically rise into Q4, with additional pressure around early Q1; Textiles amplifies these moves and then reverts sharply in spring.

Understanding cost per purchase benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Textiles and all countries available helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Textiles industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.