Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Textiles in Denmark

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Textiles in Denmark

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Key takeaways

  • Over Oct 2024–Aug 2025, cost per purchase for Textiles in Denmark averaged 72.05, sitting about 46% above the global baseline (49.24) — clearly above market.
  • Strong seasonality: a pronounced Q4/early-January peak (Dec high at 105.73; Jan at 103.58), a spring slide, a July trough (32.57), then a sharp August rebound (73.93).
  • High volatility: average month-to-month absolute change was 35.7% vs just 4.7% for the global trend. Biggest swings included +127% from July to August and -39.9% from February to March.
  • The period ends lower than it began: -17.1% from October (89.13) to August (73.93), while the global baseline dipped only -2.1% over the same window.

Introduction

This analysis looks at cost per purchase trends for industry Textiles and target country Denmark compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. We review monthly medians from October 2024 through August 2025 to benchmark Facebook Ads costs and contextualize seasonality, volatility, and level versus the global baseline.

Textiles in Denmark: performance overview

  • Average (Oct 2024–Aug 2025): 72.05
  • High/low: peak at 105.73 in December 2024; low at 32.57 in July 2025 (range: 73.17)
  • Start → end: 89.13 in October 2024 to 73.93 in August 2025 (−17.1%)
  • Volatility:
  • Average absolute month-to-month change: 35.7%
  • Notable moves:
  • November → December: +31.2% (80.58 → 105.73)
  • February → March: −39.9% (92.94 → 55.87)
  • April → May: −32.9% (58.54 → 39.32)
  • May → June: +53.4% (39.32 → 60.33)
  • June → July: −46.0% (60.33 → 32.57)
  • July → August: +127.0% (32.57 → 73.93)

Seasonality is evident:

  • Q4 and early January are elevated, consistent with holiday-driven demand (Dec/Jan at the top end).
  • Costs ease through spring and early summer, bottoming in July, then rebound into August.

Comparison to the global baseline

  • Average level: Denmark Textiles at 72.05 vs global 49.24 (Oct 2024–Aug 2025), about 46% above market.
  • High/low vs baseline:
  • Denmark peak: 105.73 (Dec) vs global peak: 53.89 (Feb) — Denmark’s peak was ~96% higher.
  • Denmark low: 32.57 (Jul) vs global low: 43.19 (Nov) — Denmark dipped below the global floor.
  • Range and stability:
  • Denmark range: 73.17 vs global range: 10.69.
  • Denmark average MoM absolute change: 35.7% vs global 4.7% — markedly more volatile.
  • Trend slope:
  • Denmark: −17.1% from first to last month.
  • Global: −2.1% over the same period.
  • Seasonal alignment: Both show elevated costs around Q4/early Q1, but Denmark’s amplitudes are larger, with steeper declines into summer and a sharper August rebound.

What this means for benchmarking

Across the period, Textiles in Denmark remained above average versus the global baseline, with significant seasonal surges in Q4/early January and pronounced summer softness. Compared to the global trend, Denmark showed higher peaks, deeper troughs, and far greater month-to-month variability.

Understanding cost per purchase benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Textiles and Denmark helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Textiles industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Denmark, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Denmark Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Christmas & Boxing Day (late Dec), Easter holidays (groceries, travel, tourism), Mother's Day and Valentine's Day

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter period due to travel-related campaigns. Late December ad competition might intensify in retail and hospitality. Whit Weekend might reduce weekday competition. Strict retail closures on holidays could drop competition, but pre-holiday CPMs may escalate.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.