See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Great Britain’s cost per purchase sat consistently above the global Facebook Ads benchmark through most of 2025, but the bigger story is the amplitude: sharp swings from mid-30s to near 80 created a choppy year with pronounced peaks and troughs. A March spike, a mid-year slump, and a late‑summer rebound set the rhythm, while December ended lower than it began. Volatility was notably higher than the global pattern, which moved in smaller, steadier steps.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Great Britain compared to the global benchmark.
Across the 13-month window (Dec 2024–Dec 2025), Great Britain’s median cost per purchase averaged 54.6, versus a 50.7 global average. Starting at 47.14 in December 2024 and closing at 43.45 in December 2025, the market finished 8% lower on a Dec-to-Dec basis. Within 2025, however, the year built from 38.31 in January to 43.45 by December (+13%).
The year’s high landed in March at 79.90, more than double the July low of 36.06. Month-to-month moves averaged 13.0 points, showing far sharper swings than the global series (1.7 points). The range tells the same story: Great Britain moved across a 43.8-point span, versus just 9.8 globally. In quarter terms, the pattern cooled steadily after a Q1 crest: Q1 averaged 60.0, Q2 55.3, Q3 53.1, and Q4 52.3.
The early-year climb was decisive: January’s low base lifted to a March peak (+109% from July’s trough to March’s high), after which costs eased into June–July before rebounding in late summer. August–September marked a renewed firmness (62.99 and 60.14), then Q4 softened again. November remained relatively elevated (56.86) before a December pullback to 43.45. The cadence aligns with familiar seasonal currents—an energetic Q1 build, mid-year variability, and year-end rebalancing—though Great Britain’s arcs were steeper than typical global movements.
Relative to the global benchmark, Great Britain was higher in 8 of 13 months and lower in 5. The gap swung widely: January was 28% below global levels, while March surged 51% above. At its narrowest, December 2025 sat just 3% below the global median. The global series itself showed a smoother, gradual drift downward—peaking in February at 54.77 and finishing December at 45.02—amounting to a 13% Dec‑to‑Dec decline, compared with Great Britain’s 8% decline. On a 2025 average basis, Great Britain’s cost per purchase (55.2) outpaced the global average (50.7) by roughly 9%, underscoring higher country-specific ad costs and more pronounced variance.
Put together, the comparative picture is clear: the global line trended gently lower with modest month-to-month movement, while Great Britain traced a more dramatic path—higher highs, lower lows, and a stronger late-summer lift—yet ended the year near parity with global December levels.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per purchase across all industries in Great Britain highlights a market with higher averages, wider swings, and distinct seasonal pulses. For performance marketers tracking CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance as inputs to ultimate purchase efficiency, these country-specific ad costs contextualize industry ad performance against the global benchmark.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting United Kingdom, advertisers experience moderate to high costs with strong performance in urban areas. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday surge), Late December (Christmas & Boxing Day promotions), Early May holiday weekend promotions
CPM and CPC might increase around early May and late August bank holidays as people engage in leisure travel or retail browsing. During Black Friday/Cyber Monday, retail CPMs could spike sharply in fashion, electronics, and online shopping. Late December typically sees peak CPMs, with e‑commerce budgets needing early ramp-up.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app