Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Purchase Benchmarks for Wine and Spirits

See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Purchase for Wine and Spirits

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The Wine and Spirits market ran nearly neck-and-neck with the global all‑industry benchmark on Facebook Ads cost per purchase in 2025, but it took a far choppier route to get there. The year opened elevated, plunged into a mid‑year trough, and then surged into a Q4 peak before easing in December. Volatility was the clear headline: costs swung widely month to month, far more than the global median. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across 2025, Wine and Spirits cost per purchase averaged $51.24, essentially level with the global all‑industry average of $51.40. The category started at $55.46 in January and finished at $51.35 in December, a 7% decline across the year, mirroring the market’s broader cooling (global: −15% from $53.25 to $45.08).

The year’s low arrived in June at $33.73, followed by a steady rebuild through Q3 and a sharp Q4 surge to the annual high of $68.54 in November—roughly double June’s trough. The path was turbulent: average absolute month‑to‑month movement was $9.65 for Wine and Spirits versus just $1.77 globally, underscoring a far more volatile cost environment.

Key monthly movements:

  • Early lift: January–February rose 9% to $60.64, holding firm into March ($59.45).
  • Spring correction: a steep April dip (−29% vs March) to $42.09; brief May rebound ($53.13); then the cycle low in June ($33.73).
  • Gradual rebuild: July–September climbed from $37.99 to $47.39.
  • Q4 spike: October jumped 27% to $59.98, then November peaked at $68.54 before December reset to $51.35 (−25% vs November).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality was pronounced. After a strong Q1, performance softened sharply in late Q2, with April–June marking the weakest stretch. The category then regained momentum through Q3, culminating in a pronounced Q4 push: October and November delivered the highest costs of the year, with December moderating yet remaining above the annual mean. This rhythm—Q2 softness, Q3 rebuild, Q4 surge—was more exaggerated than the broader market, where costs drifted steadily lower into the holidays.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, Wine and Spirits spent seven months above market and five months below:

  • Above market: January–March, May, and the full Q4. The widest premium occurred in November, when Wine and Spirits ran 45% above the global level ($68.54 vs $47.16).
  • Below market: April and June–September, with the deepest discount in June at 34% below global ($33.73 vs $50.82).

The gap to global narrowed to near parity in May (about +1%), widened to a double‑digit discount through much of Q3, and then flipped to a double‑digit premium in Q4. By half‑year, H1 Wine and Spirits averaged $50.75 (−4% vs global H1’s $52.76), while H2 averaged $51.73 (+3% vs global H2’s $50.05).

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads cost‑per‑purchase benchmarks for Wine and Spirits across all countries in 2025 matched global averages in level but not in shape: a deep mid‑year valley, a Q4 crescendo, and markedly higher volatility than the market overall. Understanding these category‑specific cost dynamics within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks helps marketers assess Wine and Spirits industry ad performance across all countries relative to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a healthy cost per purchase for ecommerce brands?

It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.

How does product price impact CPA benchmarks?

Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.

Why are my purchase costs going up despite stable ROAS?

Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.

Should I use manual bidding to control CPA more effectively?

Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.

How do I scale spend without letting CPA skyrocket?

Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.