See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
July 2025 - July 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Wine and Spirits cost-per-purchase run hotter and choppier than the global baseline over the last 13 months. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits in All countries available compared to the global benchmark.
Across June 2025 → June 2026 the Wine and Spirits median cost-per-purchase averaged about $58.6, versus a global median of roughly $48.2 — roughly 22% above the baseline. The category began at $57.27 in June 2025 and closed at $49.35 in June 2026, but with a dramatic spike to $91.89 in March 2026 and a trough of $44.80 in July 2025. Volatility was material: month-to-month absolute moves averaged about $17.6 for Wine and Spirits, roughly four times the baseline’s $4.2 average monthly swing.
Starting point: $57.27 (June 2025). Ending point: $49.35 (June 2026) — a net decline of ~13.8% over the period. Average (13 months): $58.64 for Wine and Spirits vs $48.18 global. High: $91.89 in March 2026 (the year’s peak). Low: $44.80 in July 2025. Range: Wine and Spirits moved from its low to high by ~105% (44.8 → 91.9). For the baseline the high was $55.54 (March 2026) and the low $25.50 (June 2026), a more extreme downward move near period end driven by the baseline drop.
Month-level dynamics show several sharp swings: July 2025 was the lowest Wine and Spirits CPC at $44.80, then August jumped to $72.52 (+62%). March 2026 produced the largest spike to $91.89 (+98% vs February), followed by a steep retreat to $47.90 in April. These swings create a jagged trajectory rather than a smooth trend line.
Seasonality reads as episodic peaks around late winter/early spring in this window (notably January and March 2026) and relative softness across midsummer and late spring months. Wine and Spirits recorded stronger median costs in August and January (>$70 in both months) and softer periods in July, February and April (mid-$40s). The global baseline shows a more muted rhythm until a sharp drop in June 2026; otherwise the baseline moves were smaller and more consistent month-to-month.
Typical seasonal patterns (higher competitive pressure across holidays and some post-holiday rebounds) are visible in the winter months’ lifts — the movement is more pronounced in Wine and Spirits than in the global benchmark.
Across the period Wine and Spirits in All countries available ran above the global benchmark more often than not. Wine and Spirits exceeded baseline median CPC in 10 of 13 months; the exceptions were July 2025 (≈9% lower), February 2026 (≈7% lower) and April 2026 (≈3% lower). At its narrowest, Wine and Spirits was ~9% below baseline; at its widest, it was ~94% above the baseline (June 2026, driven by baseline’s sharp drop to $25.50). Overall, Wine and Spirits displayed materially higher volatility — roughly four times the baseline’s monthly movement — signaling a market with episodic surges and retrenchments compared to the steadier global trend.
Understanding cost-per-purchase benchmarks for Wine and Spirits across All countries available gives a clear picture of how this industry’s ad economics compare to global patterns, and it complements broader Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends, CPM analysis, CTR performance and country-specific ad costs within industry ad performance discussions.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app