See how your purchase costs compare. Explore ecommerce conversion cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
The Wine and Spirits market ran nearly neck-and-neck with the global all‑industry benchmark on Facebook Ads cost per purchase in 2025, but it took a far choppier route to get there. The year opened elevated, plunged into a mid‑year trough, and then surged into a Q4 peak before easing in December. Volatility was the clear headline: costs swung widely month to month, far more than the global median. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits in all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Across 2025, Wine and Spirits cost per purchase averaged $51.24, essentially level with the global all‑industry average of $51.40. The category started at $55.46 in January and finished at $51.35 in December, a 7% decline across the year, mirroring the market’s broader cooling (global: −15% from $53.25 to $45.08).
The year’s low arrived in June at $33.73, followed by a steady rebuild through Q3 and a sharp Q4 surge to the annual high of $68.54 in November—roughly double June’s trough. The path was turbulent: average absolute month‑to‑month movement was $9.65 for Wine and Spirits versus just $1.77 globally, underscoring a far more volatile cost environment.
Key monthly movements:
Seasonality was pronounced. After a strong Q1, performance softened sharply in late Q2, with April–June marking the weakest stretch. The category then regained momentum through Q3, culminating in a pronounced Q4 push: October and November delivered the highest costs of the year, with December moderating yet remaining above the annual mean. This rhythm—Q2 softness, Q3 rebuild, Q4 surge—was more exaggerated than the broader market, where costs drifted steadily lower into the holidays.
Relative to the global benchmark, Wine and Spirits spent seven months above market and five months below:
The gap to global narrowed to near parity in May (about +1%), widened to a double‑digit discount through much of Q3, and then flipped to a double‑digit premium in Q4. By half‑year, H1 Wine and Spirits averaged $50.75 (−4% vs global H1’s $52.76), while H2 averaged $51.73 (+3% vs global H2’s $50.05).
In short, Facebook Ads cost‑per‑purchase benchmarks for Wine and Spirits across all countries in 2025 matched global averages in level but not in shape: a deep mid‑year valley, a Q4 crescendo, and markedly higher volatility than the market overall. Understanding these category‑specific cost dynamics within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks helps marketers assess Wine and Spirits industry ad performance across all countries relative to global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
It depends on your product price and margins. Most brands aim for $10 to $50. For higher-ticket products, a higher CPA may be acceptable as long as you're maintaining a strong return on ad spend.
Higher-priced products typically have a higher CPA because people take longer to convert. That's not necessarily a problem if your margin can support it. You should measure CPA in context with AOV and LTV.
Your AOV may be increasing, which helps maintain ROAS even if CPA rises. You could also be facing higher CPMs, lower conversion rates, or creative fatigue.
Manual bidding can help if you're struggling to stay within target CPA. It's best used by experienced advertisers who can monitor performance and adjust regularly. It gives more control, but also requires more effort.
Increase budget gradually, rotate creative often, and avoid overlapping audiences. Scaling too quickly can lead to audience saturation and rising CPAs.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app