Understand how your CPM compares. Dive into benchmark data by industry, region, and campaign type
December 2024 - December 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
The headline in the data: Energy and Mining CPMs across all countries were dramatically more volatile than the global Facebook Ads benchmarks. The category spent the first quarter at bargain levels, then surged through spring and summer to a September peak near $93, before dropping sharply into November. Despite an elevated annual average, the story is defined by swings, not steady inflation.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.
This analysis explores ad performance trends for Energy and Mining across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Across November 2024 to November 2025, Energy and Mining CPMs averaged $33.71, well above the $20.10 global average, but with a much wider range. The period opened at $8.70 (Nov 2024) and ended essentially flat at $8.64 (Nov 2025, −0.6% year over year). The low landed in February at $5.71, with another soft print in March ($6.60). From there, pricing climbed steeply: April jumped to $34.91, May $37.11, June $42.54, then an acceleration in Q3 to $62.08 (August) and a peak at $92.60 in September. October eased to $76.73 before a reset to $8.64 in November.
Volatility was the defining feature. The average absolute month-over-month move was $19.16, versus just $1.39 for the global benchmark—roughly 14x more volatile. Standout moves included March to April (+$28.31, +429%), July to August (+$36.99, +147%), August to September (+$30.52, +49%), and the abrupt October to November pullback (−$68.09, −89%). The full-year range spanned nearly $87 ($5.71 to $92.60); the global range over the same months was a contained ~$6.9.
Seasonality appeared inverted relative to typical platform patterns. CPMs were soft in early Q1 (Q1 average: $10.53), elevated sharply in Q2 (average: $38.19), and reached their most expensive levels in Q3 (average: $59.92), with September setting the annual high. Early Q4 showed a split personality: October remained elevated ($76.73), while November fell to the year’s opening levels ($8.64). By comparison, the global benchmark was steadier and modestly firmer into late Q4 (Q1: $18.31; Q2: $19.16; Q3: $19.49; Oct–Nov: $22.99).
Relative to the global benchmark, Energy and Mining CPMs averaged 68% higher over the period, though the gap swung dramatically month to month. The category trailed in late 2024 (−64% in November, −10% in December) and again in February and March (−68% and −65%), then ran above market from April through October. The gap was narrowest in January (+8%), widened to +89% in April–May, +119% in June, and reached its widest in September at +378% above global CPMs. Even October stayed +261% above market, before November dropped back to −65% below.
While the global trend was contained and gently upward (+3% from November to November, within $17.80–$24.72), Energy and Mining showed a choppier arc—low early Q1, a step change in Q2, a Q3 premium spike, and a sharp Q4 unwind—ending the year effectively flat versus its starting point.
This CPM analysis of Facebook Ads benchmarks for Energy and Mining across all countries highlights a year defined by extreme volatility, elevated mid-year costs, and a late-year reset—useful context for interpreting country-specific ad costs and comparing industry ad performance to global patterns. Understanding CPM benchmarks for Energy and Mining globally helps frame how this category’s pricing diverges from the steadier global average.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Cost Per Mille (CPM) is the cost advertisers pay for 1,000 impressions of their Facebook ad. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
CPMs are heavily influenced by competition, seasonality (e.g., Q4 costs more), audience size, and ad quality. Smaller audiences and lower relevance scores often lead to higher CPMs.
Different campaign objectives, bidding strategies, and even time of day can change your CPM. For example, conversion campaigns usually have higher CPMs than traffic ones. Also, broad targeting tends to drive lower CPMs.
In most industries, CPMs range from $5 to $18 depending on the region and objective. Retail and e-comm campaigns often sit at the higher end. Our live data above shows a breakdown by country and industry.
Both matter, but audience quality (intent + match with your offer) usually has more impact than pure size. However, extremely tight audiences often lead to expensive CPMs due to limited delivery opportunities.
Depends on your goal. For awareness, CPM is more relevant. For performance campaigns, CPC and CPA matter more. But all are connected—inefficient CPMs can inflate your entire funnel.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app