Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads CPM Benchmarks for HR & Staffing

Understand how your CPM compares. Dive into benchmark data by industry, region, and campaign type

CPM (Cost Per Mille) for HR & Staffing

December 2024 - December 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

HR & Staffing CPMs ran well below the global, all‑industry benchmark for most of the year, then staged a sharp Q4 lift that narrowed the gap at year end. Across all countries, median CPMs opened at $8.20 in December 2024 and climbed to $21.92 by December 2025—a 167% rise off a mid‑year trough. The arc is choppy: a spring decline, a gradual rebuild through late summer, and a decisive surge into November and December. Throughout, the category remained more volatile than the broader market, but by December the distance to the global benchmark was at its narrowest point of the year. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point and finish: Median CPM moved from $8.20 (Dec ’24) to $21.92 (Dec ’25), with a category average of $10.70 across the period.
  • Highs and lows: The low arrived in May at $6.02; the high was December at $21.92. From the May low to December, CPMs rose 264%.
  • Key movements: Early momentum carried into February (+29% vs. January to $11.34), then softened through spring, dropping a steep 50% from April to May (−$6.06). The market rebuilt through late summer—August ($10.04) and September ($10.88)—before a strong Q4: October ($11.11), November ($14.35), and a step‑change in December (+$7.58 month over month).
  • Volatility: Month‑to‑month absolute changes averaged 2.32 points in HR & Staffing, more than double the global benchmark’s 1.08, signaling sharper swings in impression pricing for this category.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm is seasonal. Q1 was steady to slightly elevated (average $10.15), Q2 marked the softest stretch (average $8.24 with the May trough), and Q3 showed a measured climb (average $9.47). Q4 accelerated meaningfully to an average of $15.79, with December’s spike defining the year’s peak. This pattern aligns with a broader market cadence where performance typically softens mid‑year and impression costs rise into late Q4 as competition intensifies.

Country vs. Global

Compared to the global, all‑industry Facebook Ads benchmarks, HR & Staffing CPMs were consistently below market but on a converging path by year end.

  • Averages: HR & Staffing averaged $10.70 versus the global $20.36—about 47% lower on the year.
  • Range of the gap: The category trailed global CPMs by roughly 14% to 70% month to month. The widest gap appeared around May–June (−70% and −66% versus global), while the narrowest occurred in December (−14%).
  • Trend alignment: The global benchmark held a tight band between $18 and $20 through September before lifting to $25–$25.45 in November–December. HR & Staffing traced a more uneven route—deeper mid‑year softness followed by a steeper Q4 rebound—yet both ended with pronounced year‑end CPM highs.

In sum, this CPM analysis shows HR & Staffing impression costs across all countries running materially below the global all‑industry benchmark for most of the year, with higher volatility and a strong Q4 lift that narrowed the spread. Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for CPM in the HR & Staffing industry across all countries helps situate category‑specific ad costs within broader global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Cost Per Mille (CPM) is the cost advertisers pay for 1,000 impressions of their Facebook ad. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What affects CPM rates on Facebook Ads?

CPMs are heavily influenced by competition, seasonality (e.g., Q4 costs more), audience size, and ad quality. Smaller audiences and lower relevance scores often lead to higher CPMs.

Why does my CPM vary so much between campaigns?

Different campaign objectives, bidding strategies, and even time of day can change your CPM. For example, conversion campaigns usually have higher CPMs than traffic ones. Also, broad targeting tends to drive lower CPMs.

What's a competitive CPM for 2025?

In most industries, CPMs range from $5 to $18 depending on the region and objective. Retail and e-comm campaigns often sit at the higher end. Our live data above shows a breakdown by country and industry.

Does audience size or targeting affect CPM more?

Both matter, but audience quality (intent + match with your offer) usually has more impact than pure size. However, extremely tight audiences often lead to expensive CPMs due to limited delivery opportunities.

Should I worry more about CPM or CPC?

Depends on your goal. For awareness, CPM is more relevant. For performance campaigns, CPC and CPA matter more. But all are connected—inefficient CPMs can inflate your entire funnel.