Understand how your CPM compares. Dive into benchmark data by industry, region, and campaign type
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
HR & Staffing CPMs across All countries spent most of 2025 priced well below the global market, then posted two outsized spikes that rewrote the story: a mid-year surge in July and a sharp jump in January 2026. The year’s median sat in the low teens, but the average was pulled higher by those outliers — a profile of a market that was generally cost-efficient with rare, dramatic bursts of demand. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing in All countries compared to the global benchmark.
The year opened at $9.48 CPM in January 2025 and closed the calendar year at $13.05, a 38% lift. The absolute high arrived later: $63.90 in January 2026, after a previous spike to $52.15 in July. The low remained January 2025’s $9.48. Across the full 13-month window, HR & Staffing averaged $19.91 CPM, but the median was just $11.81 — evidence of a skewed distribution driven by two exceptional months. More than half the months sat in the $9–14 band.
Month-to-month movement was unusually sharp. Average absolute volatility was $13.63, over eight times the global benchmark’s $1.63. Key swings included a climb from $9.56 in June to $52.15 in July (+$42.59), a pullback to $18.70 in August (−$33.45), and a late-year jump from $13.05 in December to $63.90 in January 2026 (+$50.86). Outside these bursts, the market traced a relatively steady, low-cost path punctuated by a one-month lift in April to $20.90 before reverting to the teens.
Seasonality was unconventional. While many categories see CPMs build into Q4, HR & Staffing stayed subdued in October–December ($11.81 → $14.38 → $13.05) and saved its peak for January 2026. The early year was soft, with most of Q1–Q2 under $12 aside from April’s temporary lift. Q3 was the most turbulent stretch: a July spike followed by quick normalization through August and September. In contrast with typical Q4 competition, the segment did not materially inflate until the post-holiday period.
Relative to the global benchmark, HR & Staffing CPMs were below market in 10 of 13 months. In 2025 alone, HR & Staffing averaged $16.25 versus the global $20.15, roughly 19% lower. The gap narrowed notably in August (8% below market), flipped positive in April (+13%), widened to its largest deficit in June (51% below), and surged to its widest premium in January 2026 (+306%). Across the entire period, HR & Staffing’s $19.91 average sat effectively at parity with the global $19.81, but that parity masks a very different shape: the global series moved within a $16–25 corridor and finished January 2026 down 11% year over year, while HR & Staffing whipsawed and finished January up 574% versus the prior January.
In short, the benchmark for HR & Staffing across All countries combined a long stretch of low CPMs with rare, outsized spikes, whereas the global trend stayed steadier and more seasonally conventional.
This CPM analysis provides Facebook Ads benchmarks for HR & Staffing across All countries, highlighting a market that was mostly below global pricing in 2025, punctuated by July and January surges that reshaped averages. Understanding country-specific ad costs and HR & Staffing industry ad performance in this period helps contextualize Facebook Ads CPM benchmarks against broader global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Cost Per Mille (CPM) is the cost advertisers pay for 1,000 impressions of their Facebook ad. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
CPMs are heavily influenced by competition, seasonality (e.g., Q4 costs more), audience size, and ad quality. Smaller audiences and lower relevance scores often lead to higher CPMs.
Different campaign objectives, bidding strategies, and even time of day can change your CPM. For example, conversion campaigns usually have higher CPMs than traffic ones. Also, broad targeting tends to drive lower CPMs.
In most industries, CPMs range from $5 to $18 depending on the region and objective. Retail and e-comm campaigns often sit at the higher end. Our live data above shows a breakdown by country and industry.
Both matter, but audience quality (intent + match with your offer) usually has more impact than pure size. However, extremely tight audiences often lead to expensive CPMs due to limited delivery opportunities.
Depends on your goal. For awareness, CPM is more relevant. For performance campaigns, CPC and CPA matter more. But all are connected—inefficient CPMs can inflate your entire funnel.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app