See how your CTR stacks up. Explore industry, regional, and campaign-type benchmarks with Superads.
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Public Administration CTR across all countries spent most of 2025 below the cross‑industry global benchmark, sagging through mid‑year before a sharp Q4 rebound that briefly moved above market. The story is one of pronounced volatility: a steep early drop, a summer trough, then a late‑year lift that closed the gap and ended the year near the top of the range. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Public Administration across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
CTR for Public Administration started 2025 at 1.69% in January and finished at 2.18% in December, a 29% rise from start to finish. The category averaged 1.51% for the year, ranging from a low of 0.94% in July to a high of 2.21% in November—a 1.27‑point spread that signals meaningful swings in engagement.
Month to month, the path was choppy. February fell hard to 1.16% (down 0.52 points from January), March rebounded to 1.82% (+0.66), and April slid again to 1.11% (−0.71). After a brief lift in May (1.63%), CTR drifted down to the July low (0.94%). From there, the category rebuilt momentum: 1.17% in August, 1.40% in September, 1.75% in October, peaking at 2.21% in November before a slight easing to 2.18% in December. Average month‑over‑month movement was 0.40 points—much more volatile than the global pattern.
Against the cross‑industry global benchmark, which averaged 1.84% in 2025, Public Administration underperformed on average by roughly 18%. The global trend rose more smoothly from 1.69% in January to 2.12% in December, with a tighter 0.46‑point range (min 1.66% in February, max 2.12% in December) and modest monthly variability (about 0.07 points on average).
The first quarter was mixed: near‑parity in January, a February dip, and a March bounce. The second and third quarters were softer, with April through August marking the weakest stretch and July setting the annual low. Momentum turned decisively in Q4. October through December delivered the strongest sustained run of the year, culminating in November’s high and a year‑end CTR that held in the 2.18% range. This rhythm aligns with broader Facebook Ads benchmarks, where performance often firms in late Q4 as audiences engage more frequently, even as CPM analysis typically reflects heightened competition.
Public Administration tracked below the global benchmark in eight of twelve months. The gap was narrowest in January (near parity) and turned positive in March (+5% vs. global), November (+14%), and December (+3%). The widest shortfall arrived in July, when Public Administration CTR was roughly 50% below the global median. Through mid‑year, the category lagged global CTR performance by 26–42% most months (April–September). The global line climbed steadily (+26% Jan→Dec), while Public Administration’s choppier path ultimately matched the year’s upward direction but with much sharper swings.
Overall, Facebook Ads benchmarks show that Public Administration CTR across all countries was a late‑year story: weaker engagement from spring into summer, followed by a strong Q4 that closed the distance with the market and briefly outpaced it. While this view centers on CTR performance, many teams read it alongside CPC trends and CPM analysis to complete the picture of industry ad performance and country‑specific ad costs at a global level. Understanding Facebook Ads click‑through‑rate benchmarks for Public Administration across all countries helps advertisers evaluate engagement trends and compare performance to global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Click-Through Rate (CTR) is the percentage of impressions that resulted in a click on the Facebook ad. In the Public Administration industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. Why we use median instead of average We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
CTR (Click-Through Rate) is the percentage of people who click your ad after seeing it. It's calculated by dividing total clicks by total impressions, then multiplying by 100. A high CTR indicates your ad resonates with your audience and helps improve your relevance score, which can lower your overall costs.
The average Facebook ad CTR across industries sits around 0.90-1.10%. But there's significant variation. Your specific industry, audience targeting, and campaign objectives should determine your benchmark.
Low CTR usually stems from poor audience targeting, weak creative, or a disconnect between your ad content and audience needs. Your ad might simply not be standingo out enough. Check if your visuals grab attention, your copy addresses clear pain points, and your audience targeting aligns with people genuinely interested in your offer.
Yes—but only in context. High CTR is a signal that your creative works, but it doesn't guarantee conversions. Use it alongside other metrics like conversion rate to get the full picture.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app